Structured Reporting of Head and Neck Sonography Achieves Substantial Interrater Reliability.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Ultrasound International Open Pub Date : 2023-10-05 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2173-3966
Benjamin Philipp Ernst, Carla Dörsching, Alessandro Bozzato, Jennis Gabrielpillai, Sven Becker, Matthias Frank Froelich, Benedikt Kramer, Christoph Sproll, Mirco Schapher, Miguel Goncalves, Naglaa Mansour, Benedikt Hofauer, Wieland H Sommer, Felix von Scotti, Johannes Matthias Weimer, Julian Künzel
{"title":"Structured Reporting of Head and Neck Sonography Achieves Substantial Interrater Reliability.","authors":"Benjamin Philipp Ernst,&nbsp;Carla Dörsching,&nbsp;Alessandro Bozzato,&nbsp;Jennis Gabrielpillai,&nbsp;Sven Becker,&nbsp;Matthias Frank Froelich,&nbsp;Benedikt Kramer,&nbsp;Christoph Sproll,&nbsp;Mirco Schapher,&nbsp;Miguel Goncalves,&nbsp;Naglaa Mansour,&nbsp;Benedikt Hofauer,&nbsp;Wieland H Sommer,&nbsp;Felix von Scotti,&nbsp;Johannes Matthias Weimer,&nbsp;Julian Künzel","doi":"10.1055/a-2173-3966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Ultrasound examinations are often criticized for having higher examiner dependency compared to other imaging techniques. Compared to free-text reporting, structured reporting (SR) of head and neck sonography (HNS) achieves superior time efficiency as well as report quality. However, there are no findings concerning the influence of SR on the interrater reliability (IRR) of HNS. <b>Materials and Methods</b> Typical pathologies (n=4) in HNS were documented by video/images by two certified head and neck ultrasound instructors. Consequently, structured reports of these videos/images were created by n=9 senior physicians at departments of otolaryngology or maxillofacial surgery with DEGUM instructors on staff. Reports (n=36) were evaluated regarding overall completeness and IRR. Additionally, user satisfaction was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). <b>Results</b> SR yielded very high report completeness (91.8%) in all four cases with a substantial IRR (Fleiss' κ 0.73). Interrater agreement was high at 87.2% with very good user satisfaction (VAS 8.6). <b>Conclusion</b> SR has the potential to ensure high-quality examination reports with substantial comparability and very high user satisfaction. Furthermore, big data collection and analysis are facilitated by SR. Therefore, process quality, workflow, and scientific output are potentially enhanced by SR.</p>","PeriodicalId":44852,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound International Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"E26-E32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/e5/10-1055-a-2173-3966.PMC10556873.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2173-3966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Ultrasound examinations are often criticized for having higher examiner dependency compared to other imaging techniques. Compared to free-text reporting, structured reporting (SR) of head and neck sonography (HNS) achieves superior time efficiency as well as report quality. However, there are no findings concerning the influence of SR on the interrater reliability (IRR) of HNS. Materials and Methods Typical pathologies (n=4) in HNS were documented by video/images by two certified head and neck ultrasound instructors. Consequently, structured reports of these videos/images were created by n=9 senior physicians at departments of otolaryngology or maxillofacial surgery with DEGUM instructors on staff. Reports (n=36) were evaluated regarding overall completeness and IRR. Additionally, user satisfaction was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). Results SR yielded very high report completeness (91.8%) in all four cases with a substantial IRR (Fleiss' κ 0.73). Interrater agreement was high at 87.2% with very good user satisfaction (VAS 8.6). Conclusion SR has the potential to ensure high-quality examination reports with substantial comparability and very high user satisfaction. Furthermore, big data collection and analysis are facilitated by SR. Therefore, process quality, workflow, and scientific output are potentially enhanced by SR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头颈部声像图的结构化报告实现了实质性的询问可靠性。
目的超声检查经常被批评为与其他成像技术相比具有更高的检查依赖性。与自由文本报告相比,头颈部超声(HNS)的结构化报告(SR)实现了卓越的时间效率和报告质量。然而,还没有发现SR对HNS的参与者间可靠性(IRR)的影响。材料和方法HNS的典型病理(n=4)由两名经认证的头颈部超声讲师通过视频/图像记录。因此,这些视频/图像的结构化报告是由耳鼻喉科或颌面外科的n=9名高级医生在DEGUM教员的指导下创建的。对报告(n=36)的总体完整性和内部收益率进行了评估。此外,用户满意度通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。结果SR在所有四个病例中都产生了非常高的报告完整性(91.8%),具有显著的IRR(Fleiss'κ0.73)。询问者一致性高达87.2%,用户满意度非常好(VAS 8.6)。结论SR有可能确保高质量的检查报告,具有实质性的可比性和非常高的用户满意度。此外,SR有助于大数据的收集和分析。因此,SR有可能提高流程质量、工作流程和科学产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound International Open
Ultrasound International Open RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Congenital coarctation of the aorta: Role of peripheral vascular ultrasound in young hypertensive patients. Lung ultrasound score for the assessment of lung aeration in ARDS patients: comparison of two approaches. Pancreatic ultrasound: An update of measurements, reference values, and variations of the pancreas. Insights Into Modern Undergraduate Ultrasound Education: Prospective Comparison of Digital and Analog Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom Concept - The DIvAN Study. Ultrasound elastography: a brief clinical history of an evolving technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1