Development and validation of the atopic dermatitis and infant skincare knowledge, attitude, and practice (ADISKAP 1.0) scale.

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Investigation Pub Date : 2023-04-12 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1002/ped4.12374

Xiaoyan Sun, Mutong Zhao, Qiong Wu, Jing Tian, Chunping Shen, Yuan Liang, Shan Wang, Lei Jiao, Yang Wang, Mingyi Liu, Lin Ma, Xiuhua Ma

{"title":"Development and validation of the atopic dermatitis and infant skincare knowledge, attitude, and practice (ADISKAP 1.0) scale.","authors":"Xiaoyan Sun, Mutong Zhao, Qiong Wu, Jing Tian, Chunping Shen, Yuan Liang, Shan Wang, Lei Jiao, Yang Wang, Mingyi Liu, Lin Ma, Xiuhua Ma","doi":"10.1002/ped4.12374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance: Preserving skin health is crucial for atopic dermatitis control as well as for the thriving of children. However, a well-developed and validated tool that measures the knowledge, attitude, and practice of skin care is lacking.Objective: To develop and validate the atopic dermatitis and infant skincare knowledge, attitude, and practice (ADISKAP 1.0) scale that measures parental health literacy on atopic dermatitis and skin care.Methods: We conducted a review of the literature, a focus group (two dermatologists and 12 parents), and a panel discussion in order to generate the ADISKAP prototype. Two samples of parents with knowingly superior (dermatologists, n = 59) and inferior (general population, n = 395) knowledge traits participated in the validation of ADISKAP. Cronbach's alpha was reported as a measure of internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the test-retest validity. The known-groups technique was used to evaluate construct validity.Results: The ADISKAP scale contained 17 items after content and face validity validation. After removing items that displayed poor test-retest reliability (n = 4) and construct validity (n = 3), 12 items were retained in the ADISKAP 1.0.Interpretation: ADISKAP 1.0 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing parental knowledge, attitude, and practice on infantile atopic dermatitis and skin care.","PeriodicalId":19992,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Investigation","volume":"7 3","pages":"153-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/25/76/PED4-7-153.PMC10509389.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Preserving skin health is crucial for atopic dermatitis control as well as for the thriving of children. However, a well-developed and validated tool that measures the knowledge, attitude, and practice of skin care is lacking.

Objective: To develop and validate the atopic dermatitis and infant skincare knowledge, attitude, and practice (ADISKAP 1.0) scale that measures parental health literacy on atopic dermatitis and skin care.

Methods: We conducted a review of the literature, a focus group (two dermatologists and 12 parents), and a panel discussion in order to generate the ADISKAP prototype. Two samples of parents with knowingly superior (dermatologists, n = 59) and inferior (general population, n = 395) knowledge traits participated in the validation of ADISKAP. Cronbach's alpha was reported as a measure of internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the test-retest validity. The known-groups technique was used to evaluate construct validity.

Results: The ADISKAP scale contained 17 items after content and face validity validation. After removing items that displayed poor test-retest reliability (n = 4) and construct validity (n = 3), 12 items were retained in the ADISKAP 1.0.

Interpretation: ADISKAP 1.0 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing parental knowledge, attitude, and practice on infantile atopic dermatitis and skin care.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

特应性皮炎和婴儿护肤知识、态度和实践（ADISKAP 1.0）量表的开发和验证。

重要性：保护皮肤健康对控制特应性皮炎以及儿童的健康至关重要。然而，缺乏一种完善和有效的工具来衡量皮肤护理的知识、态度和实践。目的：开发和验证用于测量父母对特应性皮炎和皮肤护理的健康知识的ADISKAP 1.0量表。方法：为了生成ADISKAP原型，我们进行了文献综述、焦点小组（两名皮肤科医生和12名家长）和小组讨论。两个具有知情优势（皮肤科医生，n=59）和劣势（普通人群，n=395）知识特征的父母样本参与了ADISKAP的验证。Cronbachα被报道为内部一致性的衡量标准，并计算组内相关系数（ICC）来评估重测的有效性。使用已知分组技术来评估结构的有效性。结果：ADISKAP量表经内容和面孔有效性验证，共包含17个项目。在删除了重测可靠性（n=4）和结构有效性（n=3）较差的项目后，ADISKAP 1.0中保留了12个项目。解释：ADISKAP 2.0是评估父母对婴儿特应性皮炎和皮肤护理的知识、态度和实践的可靠有效工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊