Filippo Migliorini, Emanuela Marsilio, Francesco Oliva, Frank Hildebrand, Nicola Maffulli
{"title":"Elderly Runners and Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Emanuela Marsilio, Francesco Oliva, Frank Hildebrand, Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1097/JSA.0000000000000347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The impact of running on the onset of osteoarthritis (OA) is controversial. This study compared the incidence of OA in elderly runners versus nonrunners.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google scholar, Embase, and Web of Science databases were accessed in January 2022. All the published clinical studies investigating OA onset in runners versus non-runners were considered. Studies reporting data on OA and participants in other sports were excluded. Only studies investigating patients with a mean age older than 55 years were considered. The methodological quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 3001 participants and 6674 joints were retrieved. The mean age was 59.4±2.7 years. The mean body mass index was 24.6±2.5 kg/m2. The 5 included articles (963 runners, 2038 nonrunners) did not report significant differences in runners compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Middle aged runners did not present greater imaging or clinical signs of OA compared with nonrunner controls. Running at elite or recreational level did not increase the rate of OA progression in individuals older than 50 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":49481,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review","volume":"30 2","pages":"92-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0000000000000347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Purpose: The impact of running on the onset of osteoarthritis (OA) is controversial. This study compared the incidence of OA in elderly runners versus nonrunners.
Material and methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google scholar, Embase, and Web of Science databases were accessed in January 2022. All the published clinical studies investigating OA onset in runners versus non-runners were considered. Studies reporting data on OA and participants in other sports were excluded. Only studies investigating patients with a mean age older than 55 years were considered. The methodological quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Results: Data from 3001 participants and 6674 joints were retrieved. The mean age was 59.4±2.7 years. The mean body mass index was 24.6±2.5 kg/m2. The 5 included articles (963 runners, 2038 nonrunners) did not report significant differences in runners compared with controls.
Conclusion: Middle aged runners did not present greater imaging or clinical signs of OA compared with nonrunner controls. Running at elite or recreational level did not increase the rate of OA progression in individuals older than 50 years.
目的:跑步对骨关节炎(OA)发病的影响是有争议的。这项研究比较了老年跑步者和非跑步者OA的发生率。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统审查。PubMed、谷歌学者、Embase和Web of Science数据库于2022年1月访问。考虑了所有已发表的研究跑步者与非跑步者OA发病的临床研究。报告OA和其他运动参与者数据的研究被排除在外。只考虑调查平均年龄超过55岁的患者的研究。文章的方法学质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估。结果:检索了3001名参与者和6674个关节的数据。平均年龄59.4±2.7岁。平均体重指数为24.6±2.5 kg/m2。纳入的5篇文章(963名跑步者,2038名非跑步者)没有报告跑步者与对照组相比的显著差异。结论:与非跑步者对照组相比,中年跑步者没有表现出更大的OA影像学或临床症状。在50岁以上的人群中,以精英或娱乐水平跑步不会增加OA的进展率。
期刊介绍:
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review helps physicians digest the large volume of clinical literature in sports medicine and arthroscopy, identify the most important new developments, and apply new information effectively in clinical practice. Each issue is guest-edited by an acknowledged expert and focuses on a single topic or controversy. The Guest Editor invites the leading specialists on the topic to write review articles that highlight the most important advances. This unique format makes the journal more in-depth, authoritative, and practical than most publications in this field. The journal also includes dozens of full-color and black-and-white arthroscopic images and illustrations.