Ultraprocessed, hyper-palatable, and high energy density foods: Prevalence and distinction across 30 years in the United States

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1002/oby.23897
Cassandra A. Sutton, Matthew Stratton, Alexa M. L'Insalata, Tera L. Fazzino
{"title":"Ultraprocessed, hyper-palatable, and high energy density foods: Prevalence and distinction across 30 years in the United States","authors":"Cassandra A. Sutton,&nbsp;Matthew Stratton,&nbsp;Alexa M. L'Insalata,&nbsp;Tera L. Fazzino","doi":"10.1002/oby.23897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Ultraprocessed foods (UPF), hyper-palatable foods (HPF), and high energy density (HED) foods may contribute to obesity risk. All have distinct definitions; however, it is unknown the degree to which they may identify overlapping or distinct foods. This study examined the availability of UPF, HPF, and HED foods in the US food system from 1988 to 2018 and the degree of distinction across definitions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four data sets representing the US food system (1988, 2001, 2006, 2018) from the US Department of Agriculture were analyzed. UPF were identified based on the extent of industrialized processing. HPF were identified using the standardized definition that specifies palatability-inducing nutrient combinations. HED was characterized as &gt;2.0 kcal/g.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across years, 58% to 65% of foods were classified as UPF, 55% to 69% as HPF, and 37% to 47% as HED. Prevalence of UPF, HPF, and HED foods was higher in 2018 versus 1988 (<i>p</i> values &lt; 0.001); HPF evidenced the largest increase (14%) and UPF evidenced the smallest (4%) over time. There was moderate to high overlap in foods (40%–70%) across definitions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Together, UPF, HPF, and HED foods comprise most foods in the US food supply. Changes in availability varied across definitions, with substantial increases in HPF and HED and relative stability of UPF.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"32 1","pages":"166-175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.23897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Ultraprocessed foods (UPF), hyper-palatable foods (HPF), and high energy density (HED) foods may contribute to obesity risk. All have distinct definitions; however, it is unknown the degree to which they may identify overlapping or distinct foods. This study examined the availability of UPF, HPF, and HED foods in the US food system from 1988 to 2018 and the degree of distinction across definitions.

Methods

Four data sets representing the US food system (1988, 2001, 2006, 2018) from the US Department of Agriculture were analyzed. UPF were identified based on the extent of industrialized processing. HPF were identified using the standardized definition that specifies palatability-inducing nutrient combinations. HED was characterized as >2.0 kcal/g.

Results

Across years, 58% to 65% of foods were classified as UPF, 55% to 69% as HPF, and 37% to 47% as HED. Prevalence of UPF, HPF, and HED foods was higher in 2018 versus 1988 (p values < 0.001); HPF evidenced the largest increase (14%) and UPF evidenced the smallest (4%) over time. There was moderate to high overlap in foods (40%–70%) across definitions.

Conclusions

Together, UPF, HPF, and HED foods comprise most foods in the US food supply. Changes in availability varied across definitions, with substantial increases in HPF and HED and relative stability of UPF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超加工、超适口和高能量密度食品:30种食品的流行率和区别 在美国生活多年。
目的:超加工食品(UPF)、超适口食品(HPF)和高能量密度食品(HED)可能会增加肥胖风险。所有这些都有不同的定义;然而,尚不清楚它们在多大程度上可以识别重叠或不同的食物。这项研究调查了1988年至2018年美国食品系统中UPF、HPF和HED食品的可用性,以及不同定义之间的差异程度。方法:分析美国农业部代表美国粮食系统的四个数据集(1988年、2001年、2006年、2018年)。UPF是根据工业化加工的程度确定的。HPF是使用指定适口性诱导营养组合的标准化定义进行鉴定的。HED的特征为>2.0 kcal/g。结果:多年来,58%至65%的食物被归类为UPF,55%至69%被归类为HPF,37%至47%被归类为HED。2018年UPF、HPF和HED食品的患病率高于1988年(p值 结论:UPF、HPF和HED食品共同构成了美国食品供应中的大多数食品。可用性的变化因定义而异,HPF和HED以及UPF的相对稳定性大幅增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Poster Abstracts Oral Abstracts Issue Information Cardiometabolic characteristics of weight cycling: results from a mid-South regional comprehensive health care system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1