Predictors of biliary atresia outcome: Saudi National Study (2000 - 2018).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.4103/sjg.sjg_512_22
Mohammed Abanemai, Mohammed AlEdreesi, Ahmed Al Sarkhy, Omar I Saadah, Homoud Alhebbi, Razan Bader, Maher Alhatlani, Hana Halabi, Ahmed Aladsani, Sami Wali, Talal Alguofi, Fahad Alsayed, Amira NasserAllah, Ahmed Almehmadi, Afnan Qurban, Muhammed Salman Bashir, Aisha Alamri, Abdulrahman Al-Hussaini
{"title":"Predictors of biliary atresia outcome: Saudi National Study (2000 - 2018).","authors":"Mohammed Abanemai,&nbsp;Mohammed AlEdreesi,&nbsp;Ahmed Al Sarkhy,&nbsp;Omar I Saadah,&nbsp;Homoud Alhebbi,&nbsp;Razan Bader,&nbsp;Maher Alhatlani,&nbsp;Hana Halabi,&nbsp;Ahmed Aladsani,&nbsp;Sami Wali,&nbsp;Talal Alguofi,&nbsp;Fahad Alsayed,&nbsp;Amira NasserAllah,&nbsp;Ahmed Almehmadi,&nbsp;Afnan Qurban,&nbsp;Muhammed Salman Bashir,&nbsp;Aisha Alamri,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Al-Hussaini","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_512_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes in biliary atresia (BA) have been well-documented in large national cohorts from Europe, North America, and East Asia. Understanding the challenges that preclude success of the Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is the key to improve the overall outcomes of BA and implementing intervention strategies. Here, we analyzed the data from the Saudi national BA study (204 BA cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2018) to identify the prognostic factors of BA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and forty-three cases underwent KPE. Several prognostic factors (center case load, congenital anomalies, serum gamma-glutamyl transferase, use of steroids, ascending cholangitis post-operatively, and degree of portal fibrosis at time of KPE) were investigated and correlated with the primary outcomes of interest: 1) success of KPE (clearance of jaundice and total serum bilirubin <20 mmol/l after KPE), 2) survival with native liver (SNL), and 3) overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of steroids after KPE was associated with clearance of jaundice, 68% vs. 36.8% in the BA cases that did not receive steroids (P = 0.013; odds ratio 2.5) and a significantly better SNL rate at 2 - and 10-year of 62.22% and 57.77% vs. 39.47% and 31.57%, respectively (P = 0.01). A better 10-year SNL was observed in centers with caseload <1/year (group 1) as compared to centers that performed ≥1/year (group 2) [45.34% vs. 26.66%, respectively; P = 0.047]. On comparison of the 2 groups, cases in group 1 had KPE at significantly earlier age (median 59.5 vs. 75 days, P = 0.006) and received steroids after KPE more frequently than group 2 (69% vs. 31%, P < 0.001). None of the remaining prognostic variables were identified as being significantly related to BA outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Steroids use post-KPE predicted clearance of jaundice and better short- and long-term SNL. There is a need to establish a national BA registry in Saudi Arabia aiming to standardize the pre- and post-operative clinical practices and facilitate clinical and basic research to evaluate factors that influence BA outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":48881,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_512_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Outcomes in biliary atresia (BA) have been well-documented in large national cohorts from Europe, North America, and East Asia. Understanding the challenges that preclude success of the Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is the key to improve the overall outcomes of BA and implementing intervention strategies. Here, we analyzed the data from the Saudi national BA study (204 BA cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2018) to identify the prognostic factors of BA outcomes.

Methods: One hundred and forty-three cases underwent KPE. Several prognostic factors (center case load, congenital anomalies, serum gamma-glutamyl transferase, use of steroids, ascending cholangitis post-operatively, and degree of portal fibrosis at time of KPE) were investigated and correlated with the primary outcomes of interest: 1) success of KPE (clearance of jaundice and total serum bilirubin <20 mmol/l after KPE), 2) survival with native liver (SNL), and 3) overall survival.

Results: Use of steroids after KPE was associated with clearance of jaundice, 68% vs. 36.8% in the BA cases that did not receive steroids (P = 0.013; odds ratio 2.5) and a significantly better SNL rate at 2 - and 10-year of 62.22% and 57.77% vs. 39.47% and 31.57%, respectively (P = 0.01). A better 10-year SNL was observed in centers with caseload <1/year (group 1) as compared to centers that performed ≥1/year (group 2) [45.34% vs. 26.66%, respectively; P = 0.047]. On comparison of the 2 groups, cases in group 1 had KPE at significantly earlier age (median 59.5 vs. 75 days, P = 0.006) and received steroids after KPE more frequently than group 2 (69% vs. 31%, P < 0.001). None of the remaining prognostic variables were identified as being significantly related to BA outcome.

Conclusion: Steroids use post-KPE predicted clearance of jaundice and better short- and long-term SNL. There is a need to establish a national BA registry in Saudi Arabia aiming to standardize the pre- and post-operative clinical practices and facilitate clinical and basic research to evaluate factors that influence BA outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆道闭锁结果的预测因素:沙特国家研究(2000-2018)。
背景:来自欧洲、北美和东亚的大型国家队列已经充分记录了胆道闭锁(BA)的结果。了解阻碍Kasai门肠造口术(KPE)成功的挑战是提高BA整体疗效和实施干预策略的关键。在这里,我们分析了沙特国家BA研究的数据(2000年至2018年间诊断的204例BA病例),以确定BA结果的预后因素。方法:对143例患者进行KPE检查。研究了几个预后因素(中心病例数、先天性异常、血清γ-谷氨酰转移酶、类固醇的使用、术后上行性胆管炎和KPE时门脉纤维化程度),并与主要关注结果相关:1)KPE的成功(黄疸清除率和血清总胆红素结果:在未接受类固醇治疗的BA病例中,KPE后使用类固醇与黄疸清除率相关,分别为68%和36.8%(P=0.013;比值比2.5),2年和10年的SNL率分别为62.22%和57.77%和39.47%和31.57%,在有病例量的中心观察到更好的10年SNL。结论:KPE后使用类固醇可以预测黄疸的清除率以及更好的短期和长期SNL。有必要在沙特阿拉伯建立一个国家BA注册中心,旨在规范术前和术后的临床实践,并促进临床和基础研究,以评估影响BA结果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (SJG) is an open access peer-reviewed publication. Authors are invited to submit articles in the field of gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition, with a wide spectrum of coverage including basic science, epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutics, public health, and standards of health care in relation to the concerned specialty. Review articles are usually by invitation. However review articles of current interest and a high standard of scientific value could also be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Gut fungal profile in new onset treatment-naïve ulcerative colitis in Saudi children. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD. Association between vedolizumab and risk of clostridium difficile infection in patients with ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Translation, cultural adaptation, and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Arabic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (Ar-GerdQ). Factors associated with precancerous stomach lesions and progresion: A 7-year multi-center prospective cohort study on the low incidence of gastric cancer in central Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1