Examining the adequacy of preoperative informed consent in a developing country: Challenges in the era of surgical specialisation.

Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1111/dewb.12427
Osita Ede, Oke R Obadaseraye, Ifeanyi Anichi, Chisom Mbaeze, Chukwuka O Udemezue, Chinonso Basil-Nwachuku, Kenechi A Madu, Emmanuel C Iyidobi, Udo E Anyaehie, Cajetan U Nwadinigwe, Chidinma Ngwangwa, Uto Essien Adetula
{"title":"Examining the adequacy of preoperative informed consent in a developing country: Challenges in the era of surgical specialisation.","authors":"Osita Ede,&nbsp;Oke R Obadaseraye,&nbsp;Ifeanyi Anichi,&nbsp;Chisom Mbaeze,&nbsp;Chukwuka O Udemezue,&nbsp;Chinonso Basil-Nwachuku,&nbsp;Kenechi A Madu,&nbsp;Emmanuel C Iyidobi,&nbsp;Udo E Anyaehie,&nbsp;Cajetan U Nwadinigwe,&nbsp;Chidinma Ngwangwa,&nbsp;Uto Essien Adetula","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preoperative informed consent is a legal and ethical requirement that ensures patients understand a procedure, its associated risks and benefits, alternative treatment options, and potential complications to make an informed decision about their care. This cross-sectional study evaluated the informed consent process for major orthopaedic surgeries at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from 120 adult participants. Results showed that many patients do not read the consent form before signing it, and surgeons do not adequately explain the alternatives to surgery, potential risks, and available anaesthetic options. Higher-educated patients are more likely to read the consent form. Surgeons performed well in explaining the nature of the condition and prognosis, the procedure's potential benefits, and answering patients' questions. The study emphasises the need to improve the informed consent process to ensure patients understand and can make rational decisions about their healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preoperative informed consent is a legal and ethical requirement that ensures patients understand a procedure, its associated risks and benefits, alternative treatment options, and potential complications to make an informed decision about their care. This cross-sectional study evaluated the informed consent process for major orthopaedic surgeries at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from 120 adult participants. Results showed that many patients do not read the consent form before signing it, and surgeons do not adequately explain the alternatives to surgery, potential risks, and available anaesthetic options. Higher-educated patients are more likely to read the consent form. Surgeons performed well in explaining the nature of the condition and prognosis, the procedure's potential benefits, and answering patients' questions. The study emphasises the need to improve the informed consent process to ensure patients understand and can make rational decisions about their healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
检查发展中国家术前知情同意的充分性:外科专业化时代的挑战。
术前知情同意是一项法律和伦理要求,确保患者了解手术及其相关风险和益处、替代治疗方案和潜在并发症,以便对其护理做出知情决定。这项横断面研究评估了尼日利亚一家三级医院重大整形外科手术的知情同意程序。使用自填问卷从120名成年参与者中收集数据。结果显示,许多患者在签署同意书之前没有阅读同意书,外科医生也没有充分解释手术的替代方案、潜在风险和可用的麻醉方案。受过高等教育的患者更有可能阅读同意书。外科医生在解释病情和预后的性质、手术的潜在益处以及回答患者的问题方面表现良好。这项研究强调需要改进知情同意程序,以确保患者了解并能够对他们的医疗保健做出合理的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1