Exploring Inequalities in the Use, Quality, and Outcome of the Diabetes Management Program of Indonesian National Health Insurance.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Equity Pub Date : 2023-09-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0025
Joko Mulyanto, Yudhi Wibowo, Dwi Arini Ernawati, Diyah Woro Dwi Lestari, Dionne S Kringos
{"title":"Exploring Inequalities in the Use, Quality, and Outcome of the Diabetes Management Program of Indonesian National Health Insurance.","authors":"Joko Mulyanto, Yudhi Wibowo, Dwi Arini Ernawati, Diyah Woro Dwi Lestari, Dionne S Kringos","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Access to diabetes management programs is crucial to control the increasing contribution of diabetes to the global burden of disease. However, evidence regarding whether such services are equally accessible for all population groups is still lacking, particularly in the context of low-middle-income countries and under the National Health Insurance (NHI). This study aimed to assess the extent of socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in the use, quality, and outcome of a diabetes management program for beneficiaries of Indonesian NHI. Methods: A total of 628 participants in the NHI diabetes management program in Banyumas District, Indonesia, were included in 2021 in this cross-sectional study. The main variables measured were regular visits to primary care facilities, standard medication, and glycemic control. The rate difference and rate ratio of age-sex standardized prevalence rates, as well as multiple logistic regressions, were used to measure the extent of inequalities. Results: Around 70% of participants regularly visited primary care facilities and received standard medication, but only 35% had good glycemic control. Highly educated participants were more likely to have regular visits compared to low-educated participants (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.04–3.56). Based on employment and type of NHI beneficiaries, a small extent and even reverse inequalities were found although these findings were insignificant statistically. Urban residents were also more likely to have regular visits (OR 6.61; 95% CI: 2.90–15.08), receive standard medication (OR 9.73; 95% CI: 3.66–25.90), and have good glycemic control (OR 3.85; 95% CI: 1.68–8.83) compared to rural residents. Conclusions: Evidence on the extent of socioeconomic inequalities is inconclusive but substantial geographical inequalities in the use, quality, and outcome of diabetes management programs exist among Indonesian NHI beneficiaries. Future implementation policies of the program should consider particularly the geographical characteristics of participants to avoid and reduce inequalities and, hence, the disease burden of diabetes.","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"644-652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Access to diabetes management programs is crucial to control the increasing contribution of diabetes to the global burden of disease. However, evidence regarding whether such services are equally accessible for all population groups is still lacking, particularly in the context of low-middle-income countries and under the National Health Insurance (NHI). This study aimed to assess the extent of socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in the use, quality, and outcome of a diabetes management program for beneficiaries of Indonesian NHI. Methods: A total of 628 participants in the NHI diabetes management program in Banyumas District, Indonesia, were included in 2021 in this cross-sectional study. The main variables measured were regular visits to primary care facilities, standard medication, and glycemic control. The rate difference and rate ratio of age-sex standardized prevalence rates, as well as multiple logistic regressions, were used to measure the extent of inequalities. Results: Around 70% of participants regularly visited primary care facilities and received standard medication, but only 35% had good glycemic control. Highly educated participants were more likely to have regular visits compared to low-educated participants (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.04–3.56). Based on employment and type of NHI beneficiaries, a small extent and even reverse inequalities were found although these findings were insignificant statistically. Urban residents were also more likely to have regular visits (OR 6.61; 95% CI: 2.90–15.08), receive standard medication (OR 9.73; 95% CI: 3.66–25.90), and have good glycemic control (OR 3.85; 95% CI: 1.68–8.83) compared to rural residents. Conclusions: Evidence on the extent of socioeconomic inequalities is inconclusive but substantial geographical inequalities in the use, quality, and outcome of diabetes management programs exist among Indonesian NHI beneficiaries. Future implementation policies of the program should consider particularly the geographical characteristics of participants to avoid and reduce inequalities and, hence, the disease burden of diabetes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨印尼国家健康保险糖尿病管理项目在使用、质量和结果方面的不平等。
引言:获得糖尿病管理计划对于控制糖尿病对全球疾病负担的日益增加至关重要。然而,关于所有人口群体是否都能平等获得此类服务的证据仍然缺乏,特别是在中低收入国家和国家健康保险的情况下。本研究旨在评估印度尼西亚国家健康保险受益人在糖尿病管理计划的使用、质量和结果方面的社会经济和地理不平等程度。方法:2021年,共有628名印度尼西亚Banyumas区国家健康保险糖尿病管理计划参与者参与了这项横断面研究。测量的主要变量是定期访问初级保健设施、标准药物和血糖控制。年龄-性别标准化患病率的比率差异和比率比率,以及多元逻辑回归,被用来衡量不平等的程度。结果:约70%的参与者定期访问初级保健机构并接受标准药物治疗,但只有35%的参与者血糖控制良好。与低学历参与者相比,受过高等教育的参与者更有可能定期就诊(比值比[OR]1.92;95%置信区间[95%CI]:1.04-3.56)。根据就业和NHI受益人的类型,发现了小范围甚至逆转的不平等,尽管这些发现在统计上微不足道。与农村居民相比,城市居民更有可能定期就诊(OR 6.61;95%CI:2.90-11.08),接受标准药物治疗(OR 9.73;95%CI:3.66-25.90),血糖控制良好(OR 3.85;95%CI:1.68-8.83)。结论:关于社会经济不平等程度的证据尚不确定,但印尼国家健康保险受益人在糖尿病管理项目的使用、质量和结果方面存在严重的地理不平等。该计划未来的实施政策应特别考虑参与者的地理特征,以避免和减少不平等,从而减少糖尿病的疾病负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Getting Ours? "Girlbossing" and the Ethics of Nurse Reimbursement Models. "She's a Family Member": How Community Health Workers Impact Perinatal Mothers' Stress Through Social-Emotional Support and Connections to Programs and Resources. Diversifying Doulas Initiative: Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in People of Color Through Doula Care. Improving Weight Bias Awareness Among Providers in the Sexual and Reproductive Health care Setting. Racial (In)Equity in South Los Angeles-Community Centered Experiences with COVID-19 Syndemics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1