Purpose Built Catheters for Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy: Experience from a Canadian Tertiary Level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2023-06-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.29390/001c.77606
Talib Al Harthy, Michael R Miller, Orlando daSilva, Soume Bhattacharya
{"title":"Purpose Built Catheters for Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy: Experience from a Canadian Tertiary Level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Talib Al Harthy, Michael R Miller, Orlando daSilva, Soume Bhattacharya","doi":"10.29390/001c.77606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST), a method of surfactant delivery via a thin catheter during spontaneous breathing, is an increasingly popular alternative to intubation and surfactant administration. Recently, purpose-built catheters for MIST received regulatory approval in Canada and became available for use. However, procedural success and user experience with such catheters have not been described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included neonates who received MIST using purpose-built catheters between January 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022. Two types of purpose-built catheters were used in this period - SurfCath™ and BLEScath™. Procedural success, number of attempts, and adverse events in neonates receiving MIST via the two catheters were compared using chi-square or Fisher's tests. User experience was described using an ease-of-use scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven neonates met eligibility criteria; 22 received MIST via SurfCath™, whereas 15 received MIST via BLEScath™. Success rates were 91% in SurfCath™ and 93% in BLEScath™ (P> 0.994). Failed attempts were lower in SurfCath™ (23%) in comparison to BLEScath™ (33%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.708). Among operators, 90% found SurfCath™ very easy/relatively easy to use compared to 43% of users reflecting the same degree of use with BLEScath™ (P=.021). There was no difference in adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study in Canada to report MIST with purpose-built catheters. Overall, the success rate was equally high with both catheters. Users subjectively reported higher ease of use with SurfCath™. Commercially available purpose-built catheters should facilitate universal adaptation of the MIST method.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":"59 ","pages":"137-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/fa/cjrt_2023_59_77606.PMC10540161.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/001c.77606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST), a method of surfactant delivery via a thin catheter during spontaneous breathing, is an increasingly popular alternative to intubation and surfactant administration. Recently, purpose-built catheters for MIST received regulatory approval in Canada and became available for use. However, procedural success and user experience with such catheters have not been described.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included neonates who received MIST using purpose-built catheters between January 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022. Two types of purpose-built catheters were used in this period - SurfCath™ and BLEScath™. Procedural success, number of attempts, and adverse events in neonates receiving MIST via the two catheters were compared using chi-square or Fisher's tests. User experience was described using an ease-of-use scale.

Results: Thirty-seven neonates met eligibility criteria; 22 received MIST via SurfCath™, whereas 15 received MIST via BLEScath™. Success rates were 91% in SurfCath™ and 93% in BLEScath™ (P> 0.994). Failed attempts were lower in SurfCath™ (23%) in comparison to BLEScath™ (33%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.708). Among operators, 90% found SurfCath™ very easy/relatively easy to use compared to 43% of users reflecting the same degree of use with BLEScath™ (P=.021). There was no difference in adverse events.

Conclusion: This is the first study in Canada to report MIST with purpose-built catheters. Overall, the success rate was equally high with both catheters. Users subjectively reported higher ease of use with SurfCath™. Commercially available purpose-built catheters should facilitate universal adaptation of the MIST method.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于微创表面活性剂治疗的特制导管:加拿大三级新生儿重症监护室的经验。
背景:微创表面活性剂治疗(MIST)是一种在自主呼吸期间通过薄导管输送表面活性剂的方法,是插管和表面活性剂给药的一种越来越受欢迎的替代方法。最近,用于MIST的特制导管在加拿大获得了监管部门的批准,并可供使用。然而,尚未描述这种导管的手术成功和用户体验。方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括2021年1月1日至2022年3月31日期间使用特制导管接受MIST的新生儿。这一时期使用了两种专门制造的导管——SurfCath™ 和BLEScath™. 使用卡方检验或Fisher检验比较通过两种导管接受MIST的新生儿的手术成功率、尝试次数和不良事件。使用易用性量表描述了用户体验。结果:37名新生儿符合资格标准;22通过SurfCath接收到MIST™, 而15个通过BLEScath接收到MIST™. SurfCath的成功率为91%™ BLEScath为93%™ (P>0.994)。SurfCath的失败次数较低™ (23%)与BLEScath相比™ (33%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.708)。在操作员中,90%的人发现SurfCath™ 非常容易/相对容易使用,相比之下,43%的用户使用BLEScath的程度相同™ (P=0.021)。不良事件没有差异。结论:这是加拿大首次报道使用特制导管进行MIST的研究。总的来说,两种导管的成功率都一样高。用户主观上报告SurfCath的易用性更高™. 商用专用导管应有助于MIST方法的普遍适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
期刊最新文献
Development of a guide for continuous positive airway pressure use - A good fit: Making continuous positive airway pressure work for you. Is CT pulmonary angiography overutilized in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism? A retrospective study. Highlighting the year's most transformative research as voted by the editorial board: Exploring knowledge gaps and research needs in respiratory therapy. Earning a Journal Impact Factor: Progress, recognition, and growth for the CJRT. CPAP vs HFNC in treatment of patients with COVID-19 ARDS: A retrospective propensity-matched study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1