Insight into the relationship between forced vital capacity and transfer of the lungs for carbon monoxide in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101042
Thibaud Soumagne , Sébastien Quétant , Alicia Guillien , Loïc Falque , David Hess , Bernard Aguilaniu , Bruno Degano
{"title":"Insight into the relationship between forced vital capacity and transfer of the lungs for carbon monoxide in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis","authors":"Thibaud Soumagne ,&nbsp;Sébastien Quétant ,&nbsp;Alicia Guillien ,&nbsp;Loïc Falque ,&nbsp;David Hess ,&nbsp;Bernard Aguilaniu ,&nbsp;Bruno Degano","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Forced vital capacity (FVC) is routinely used to quantify the severity and identify the progression of </span>idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis<span> (IPF). Although less commonly used, lung transfer of carbon monoxide (TLCO) correlates better with the severity of IPF than does FVC.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Aiming at studying how FVC behaves in relation to TLCO, we analysed cross-sectional data from 430 IPF patients, of which 221 had at least 2 assessments (performed 2.4 ± 1.9 years apart) available for longitudinal analyses. Thresholds for identifying “abnormal” FVC and TLCO values were the statistically-defined lower limits of normal (LLN). For patients with longitudinal data, mean annual absolute declines of FVC and TLCO were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The correlation between FVC and TLCO (%predicted) was weak (R<sup>2</sup>=0.21). FVC was “abnormal” (i.e., &lt;LLN) in 38% of patients while 84% of patients had an “abnormal” TLCO. A large majority of the 268 patients with a “normal” FVC had nevertheless an “abnormal” TLCO (<em>n</em> = 209; 78%). On longitudinal analysis, 67/221 patients had an annual absolute decline in FVC≥5%, 34/221 had an annual absolute decline in TLCO ≥10%, and 22 had both.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In IPF, a “normal” FVC should be viewed with caution as it is most often associated with an “abnormal” TLCO, a parameter that is strongly correlated with the morphological extent of the disease. Only 1/3 of the patients with a FVC-based progression criterion also had a TLCO progression criterion. In contrast, 2/3 of patients with a TLCO progression criterion also had a FVC progression criterion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041223000545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is routinely used to quantify the severity and identify the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although less commonly used, lung transfer of carbon monoxide (TLCO) correlates better with the severity of IPF than does FVC.

Methods

Aiming at studying how FVC behaves in relation to TLCO, we analysed cross-sectional data from 430 IPF patients, of which 221 had at least 2 assessments (performed 2.4 ± 1.9 years apart) available for longitudinal analyses. Thresholds for identifying “abnormal” FVC and TLCO values were the statistically-defined lower limits of normal (LLN). For patients with longitudinal data, mean annual absolute declines of FVC and TLCO were calculated.

Results

The correlation between FVC and TLCO (%predicted) was weak (R2=0.21). FVC was “abnormal” (i.e., <LLN) in 38% of patients while 84% of patients had an “abnormal” TLCO. A large majority of the 268 patients with a “normal” FVC had nevertheless an “abnormal” TLCO (n = 209; 78%). On longitudinal analysis, 67/221 patients had an annual absolute decline in FVC≥5%, 34/221 had an annual absolute decline in TLCO ≥10%, and 22 had both.

Conclusion

In IPF, a “normal” FVC should be viewed with caution as it is most often associated with an “abnormal” TLCO, a parameter that is strongly correlated with the morphological extent of the disease. Only 1/3 of the patients with a FVC-based progression criterion also had a TLCO progression criterion. In contrast, 2/3 of patients with a TLCO progression criterion also had a FVC progression criterion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解特发性肺纤维化患者的强迫肺活量与肺部一氧化碳转移之间的关系。
背景:强迫肺活量(FVC)通常用于量化特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的严重程度和确定其进展。尽管不太常用,但与FVC相比,一氧化碳肺转移(TLCO)与IPF严重程度的相关性更好。方法:为了研究FVC与TLCO的关系,我们分析了430名IPF患者的横断面数据,其中221名患者至少有2项评估(间隔2.4±1.9年进行)可用于纵向分析。识别“异常”FVC和TLCO值的阈值是统计定义的正常下限(LLN)。对于有纵向数据的患者,计算FVC和TLCO的年平均绝对下降。结果:FVC和TLCO(预测百分比)之间的相关性较弱(R2=0.21)。FVC为“异常”(即,结论:在IPF中,应谨慎看待“正常”FVC,因为它最常与“异常”TLCO,一个与疾病的形态学程度密切相关的参数。在基于FVC的进展标准的患者中,只有1/3的患者也有TLCO进展标准。相反,2/3的TLCO进展标准患者也有FVC进展标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Physical activity and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A prospective cohort study in UK Biobank and Mendelian randomization analyses Admission chest CT scan of intensive care patients with interstitial lung disease: Unveiling its limited predictive value through visual and automated analyses in a retrospective study (ILDICTO) Elevated serum angiotensin converting enzyme correlates with specific HLA-DRB1 alleles and extrapulmonary manifestations in sarcoidosis How safe is lung transplantation in patients of 65 years or older? A single-center retrospective cohort Sarcoid-like reaction related to ALK-ROS inhibitors in lung cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1