One size does not fit all: community views on choices for TB treatment and prevention.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Public Health Action Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.5588/pha.23.0034
A Makone, K Angami, D Bhattacharya, M Frick, J G Castillo, R Herrera, L McKenna, G K Moses, O Rucsineanu, A H Sari, J Stillo, P Agbassi
{"title":"One size does not fit all: community views on choices for TB treatment and prevention.","authors":"A Makone,&nbsp;K Angami,&nbsp;D Bhattacharya,&nbsp;M Frick,&nbsp;J G Castillo,&nbsp;R Herrera,&nbsp;L McKenna,&nbsp;G K Moses,&nbsp;O Rucsineanu,&nbsp;A H Sari,&nbsp;J Stillo,&nbsp;P Agbassi","doi":"10.5588/pha.23.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment and prevention paradigms in TB have been dominated by a 'one-size-fits-all' approach, in which all persons are given the same treatment regimens. This stands in contrast to other health conditions, where differentiated models of care have been shown to be effective. In this Viewpoint, we make the case for considering multiple factors when deciding which regimens should be offered to people with TB infection and disease. Choice about which regimens to use should be made in conjunction with people who have TB and consider efficacy, safety, duration, pill burden, formulation, drug interactions, time spent in monitoring, drug susceptibility, compatibility with other areas of life, and availability of support services. Ideally, these choices should be considered within an equity framework with the most intensified services being offered to those considered most vulnerable.</p>","PeriodicalId":46239,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Action","volume":"13 3","pages":"67-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.23.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment and prevention paradigms in TB have been dominated by a 'one-size-fits-all' approach, in which all persons are given the same treatment regimens. This stands in contrast to other health conditions, where differentiated models of care have been shown to be effective. In this Viewpoint, we make the case for considering multiple factors when deciding which regimens should be offered to people with TB infection and disease. Choice about which regimens to use should be made in conjunction with people who have TB and consider efficacy, safety, duration, pill burden, formulation, drug interactions, time spent in monitoring, drug susceptibility, compatibility with other areas of life, and availability of support services. Ideally, these choices should be considered within an equity framework with the most intensified services being offered to those considered most vulnerable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一刀切并不适合所有人:社区对结核病治疗和预防选择的看法。
结核病的治疗和预防模式一直以“一刀切”的方法为主,即所有人都得到相同的治疗方案。这与其他健康状况形成了鲜明对比,在其他健康状况下,差异化的护理模式已被证明是有效的。在这种观点中,我们提出了在决定应为结核病感染者和疾病患者提供哪些治疗方案时考虑多种因素的理由。应结合结核病患者选择使用哪种方案,并考虑疗效、安全性、持续时间、药丸负担、配方、药物相互作用、监测时间、药物易感性、与生活其他领域的兼容性以及支持服务的可用性。理想情况下,这些选择应该在公平的框架内考虑,向那些被认为最脆弱的人提供最强化的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Action
Public Health Action RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Launched on 1 May 2011, Public Health Action (PHA) is an official publication of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union). It is an open access, online journal available world-wide to physicians, health workers, researchers, professors, students and decision-makers, including public health centres, medical, university and pharmaceutical libraries, hospitals, clinics, foundations and institutions. PHA is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that actively encourages, communicates and reports new knowledge, dialogue and controversy in health systems and services for people in vulnerable and resource-limited communities — all topics that reflect the mission of The Union, Health solutions for the poor.
期刊最新文献
TB burden and diagnostic challenges at Sandaun Provincial Hospital in West Sepik Province of PNG, 2016-2021. TB-related technical enquiries received at the Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan, during COVID-19. Continuous quality improvement in a community-wide TB screening and prevention programme in Papua New Guinea. Effects of extrapulmonary TB on patient quality of life and recurrence. Impact of Truenat on TB diagnosis in Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1