Rapid Methadone Induction in a General Hospital Setting: A Retrospective, Observational Analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Substance abuse Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1177/08897077231185655
Sarah Casey, Susan Regan, Evan Gale, Zoe M Adams, Eugene Lambert, Faith O Omede, Sarah E Wakeman
{"title":"Rapid Methadone Induction in a General Hospital Setting: A Retrospective, Observational Analysis.","authors":"Sarah Casey,&nbsp;Susan Regan,&nbsp;Evan Gale,&nbsp;Zoe M Adams,&nbsp;Eugene Lambert,&nbsp;Faith O Omede,&nbsp;Sarah E Wakeman","doi":"10.1177/08897077231185655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outpatient methadone guidelines recommend starting at a low dose and titrating slowly. As fentanyl prevalence and opioid-related mortality increases, there is a need for individuals to rapidly achieve a therapeutic methadone dose. Hospitalization offers a monitored setting for methadone initiation, however dosing practices and safety are not well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, observational analysis of hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder seen by an inpatient addiction consult team in an academic medical center who were newly initiated on methadone between 2016 and 2022. We calculated initial daily dose, maximum daily dose, timing interval of dose escalation, whether patients were connected to an opioid treatment program (OTP) prior to discharge, whether adverse effects or safety events occurred during the hospitalization, and whether such events were definitely or probably related versus possibly related or unrelated to methadone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twelve patients were included. The mean initial daily methadone dose administered was 32 mg (range: 10-90 mg). The mean maximum dose reached was 76.8 mg (range 30-165 mg). The mean number of days from initial to peak dose was 5.6 days (range 1-19 days). Overall, 30% of patients experienced a safety event, most commonly sedation. Only 4 safety events were deemed probably or definitely related to methadone. In regression analyses, there was no significant difference between starting doses among patients with or without sedation but there was a relationship between last dose and the likelihood of any possibly related event, with those ending at a dose of 100 mg or higher having a higher likelihood event, compared to those ending at lower doses (47.8% vs 12.4%, <i>P</i> < .001). Seventy-six percent were connected to OTP before discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among hospitalized patients initiating methadone, rapid dose titration was infrequently associated with related safety events and most were connected to community-based methadone treatment before discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":"44 3","pages":"177-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08897077231185655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outpatient methadone guidelines recommend starting at a low dose and titrating slowly. As fentanyl prevalence and opioid-related mortality increases, there is a need for individuals to rapidly achieve a therapeutic methadone dose. Hospitalization offers a monitored setting for methadone initiation, however dosing practices and safety are not well described.

Methods: Retrospective, observational analysis of hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder seen by an inpatient addiction consult team in an academic medical center who were newly initiated on methadone between 2016 and 2022. We calculated initial daily dose, maximum daily dose, timing interval of dose escalation, whether patients were connected to an opioid treatment program (OTP) prior to discharge, whether adverse effects or safety events occurred during the hospitalization, and whether such events were definitely or probably related versus possibly related or unrelated to methadone.

Results: One hundred twelve patients were included. The mean initial daily methadone dose administered was 32 mg (range: 10-90 mg). The mean maximum dose reached was 76.8 mg (range 30-165 mg). The mean number of days from initial to peak dose was 5.6 days (range 1-19 days). Overall, 30% of patients experienced a safety event, most commonly sedation. Only 4 safety events were deemed probably or definitely related to methadone. In regression analyses, there was no significant difference between starting doses among patients with or without sedation but there was a relationship between last dose and the likelihood of any possibly related event, with those ending at a dose of 100 mg or higher having a higher likelihood event, compared to those ending at lower doses (47.8% vs 12.4%, P < .001). Seventy-six percent were connected to OTP before discharge.

Conclusion: Among hospitalized patients initiating methadone, rapid dose titration was infrequently associated with related safety events and most were connected to community-based methadone treatment before discharge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合医院环境中的快速美沙酮诱导:回顾性观察分析。
背景:门诊美沙酮指南建议从低剂量开始慢慢滴定。随着芬太尼流行率和阿片类药物相关死亡率的增加,个人需要迅速获得治疗剂量的美沙酮。住院治疗为美沙酮的启动提供了一个监测环境,但给药实践和安全性没有得到很好的描述。方法:对2016年至2022年间新开始服用美沙酮的学术医疗中心住院成瘾咨询团队发现的阿片类药物使用障碍住院患者进行回顾性观察性分析。我们计算了初始日剂量、最大日剂量、剂量递增的时间间隔、患者出院前是否与阿片类药物治疗计划(OTP)有关、住院期间是否发生了不良反应或安全事件,以及这些事件是否与美沙酮有明确或可能相关或可能无关。结果:共纳入112例患者。美沙酮的平均初始每日剂量为32 mg(范围:10-90 mg)。达到的平均最大剂量为76.8 mg(范围30-165 mg)。从初始剂量到峰值剂量的平均天数为5.6天 天(范围1-19 天)。总体而言,30%的患者经历了安全事件,最常见的是镇静。只有4起安全事件被认为可能或肯定与美沙酮有关。在回归分析中,具有或不具有镇静作用的患者的起始剂量之间没有显著差异,但最后一次剂量与任何可能相关事件的可能性之间存在关系,以100的剂量结束 mg或更高,与以较低剂量结束的那些相比,具有更高可能性事件(47.8%对12.4%,P 结论:在开始服用美沙酮的住院患者中,快速剂量滴定很少与相关安全事件相关,大多数患者在出院前接受社区美沙酮治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
期刊最新文献
Cocaine Use is Associated With Increased LVMI in Unstably Housed Women With Polysubstance Use. Impact of Mandated Case Review Policy on Opioid Discontinuation and Mortality Among High-Risk Long-Term Opioid Therapy Patients: The STORM Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Improving DEIB in Addiction Medicine Training Through Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Program Evaluation. Advancing Proficiencies for Health Professionals in the Treatment of Tobacco Use Among Marginalized Communities: Development of a Competency-Based Curriculum and Virtual Workshop. Care Practices of Mental Health Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners Within an Interdisciplinary Primary Care Model for Patients With Substance Use Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1