The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study.

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2023-07-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895231189198
Henna Hasson, Emma Hedberg Rundgren, Helena Strehlenert, Anna Gärdegård, Håkan Uvhagen, Charlotte Klinga, Åsa Hedberg Rundgren, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
{"title":"The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study.","authors":"Henna Hasson,&nbsp;Emma Hedberg Rundgren,&nbsp;Helena Strehlenert,&nbsp;Anna Gärdegård,&nbsp;Håkan Uvhagen,&nbsp;Charlotte Klinga,&nbsp;Åsa Hedberg Rundgren,&nbsp;Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz","doi":"10.1177/26334895231189198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) seldom fit seamlessly into a setting and are often adapted. The literature identifies practitioners' management of fidelity and adaptations as problematic but offers little guidance. This study aimed to investigate practitioners' perceptions of the feasibility and usability of an intervention aimed to support them in fidelity and adaptation management when working with EBIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intervention, the adaptation and fidelity tool (A-FiT), was developed based on the literature, along with input from social service practitioners and social services' Research and Development units' personnel. The intervention consisted of two workshops where the participants were guided through a five-step process to manage fidelity and adaptations. It was tested in a longitudinal mixed-method intervention study with 103 practitioners from 19 social service units in Stockholm, Sweden. A multimethod data collection was employed, which included interviews at follow-up, questionnaires at baseline and follow-up (readiness for change and self-rated knowledge), workshop evaluation questionnaires (usability and feasibility) after each workshop, and documentation (participants' notes on worksheets). To analyze the data, qualitative content analysis, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the practitioners had a positive perception of the intervention and perceived it as relevant for fidelity and adaptation management (mean ratings over 7.0 on usability and feasibility). The workshops also provided new knowledge and skills to manage fidelity and adaptations. Furthermore, the intervention provided insights into the practitioners' understanding about adaptation and fidelity through a more reflective approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practical tools are needed to guide professionals not only to adhere to intervention core elements but also to help them to manage fidelity and adaptation. The proposed A-FiT intervention for practitioners' management of both fidelity and adaptation is a novel contribution to the implementation literature. Potentially, the next step is an evaluation of the intervention's impact in an experimental design.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"26334895231189198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/fd/10.1177_26334895231189198.PMC10392202.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895231189198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) seldom fit seamlessly into a setting and are often adapted. The literature identifies practitioners' management of fidelity and adaptations as problematic but offers little guidance. This study aimed to investigate practitioners' perceptions of the feasibility and usability of an intervention aimed to support them in fidelity and adaptation management when working with EBIs.

Methods: The intervention, the adaptation and fidelity tool (A-FiT), was developed based on the literature, along with input from social service practitioners and social services' Research and Development units' personnel. The intervention consisted of two workshops where the participants were guided through a five-step process to manage fidelity and adaptations. It was tested in a longitudinal mixed-method intervention study with 103 practitioners from 19 social service units in Stockholm, Sweden. A multimethod data collection was employed, which included interviews at follow-up, questionnaires at baseline and follow-up (readiness for change and self-rated knowledge), workshop evaluation questionnaires (usability and feasibility) after each workshop, and documentation (participants' notes on worksheets). To analyze the data, qualitative content analysis, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed.

Results: Overall, the practitioners had a positive perception of the intervention and perceived it as relevant for fidelity and adaptation management (mean ratings over 7.0 on usability and feasibility). The workshops also provided new knowledge and skills to manage fidelity and adaptations. Furthermore, the intervention provided insights into the practitioners' understanding about adaptation and fidelity through a more reflective approach.

Conclusion: Practical tools are needed to guide professionals not only to adhere to intervention core elements but also to help them to manage fidelity and adaptation. The proposed A-FiT intervention for practitioners' management of both fidelity and adaptation is a novel contribution to the implementation literature. Potentially, the next step is an evaluation of the intervention's impact in an experimental design.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持社会服务从业者平衡忠诚和适应的适应和忠诚工具:纵向、混合方法评估研究。
背景:基于证据的干预措施(EBI)很少能无缝地融入一个环境,而且往往是经过调整的。文献指出,从业者对忠诚度和适应性的管理存在问题,但几乎没有提供指导。本研究旨在调查从业者对干预措施的可行性和可用性的看法,该干预措施旨在支持他们在使用EBI时进行保真度和适应管理,以及社会服务从业者和社会服务“研发单位”人员的投入。干预措施包括两个研讨会,在研讨会上,参与者被引导通过五个步骤来管理忠诚度和适应性。它在一项纵向混合方法干预研究中进行了测试,该研究有来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩19个社会服务单位的103名从业者。采用了多方法数据收集,包括随访时的访谈、基线和随访时的问卷调查(变革准备情况和自我评估知识)、每次研讨会后的研讨会评估问卷调查(可用性和可行性)以及文件记录(参与者在工作表上的笔记)。为了分析数据,进行了定性内容分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果:总体而言,从业者对干预措施有积极的看法,并认为它与保真度和适应管理相关(可用性和可行性的平均评分超过7.0)。讲习班还提供了管理忠诚度和适应性的新知识和技能。此外,干预通过更具反思性的方法,深入了解了从业者对适应和忠诚度的理解。结论:需要实用的工具来指导专业人员不仅要坚持干预的核心要素,还要帮助他们管理忠诚度和适应能力。所提出的A-FiT干预措施用于从业者对保真度和适应度的管理,是对实施文献的一项新贡献。下一步可能是在实验设计中评估干预措施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a pilot implementation of a digital cognitive behavioral therapy platform for isolated older adults in county mental health services. Calculating power for multilevel implementation trials in mental health: Meaningful effect sizes, intraclass correlation coefficients, and proportions of variance explained by covariates. Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners. Are we being equitable enough? Lessons learned from sites lost in an implementation trial. Examining implementation determinants of a culturally grounded, school-based prevention curriculum in rural Hawai'i: A test development and validation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1