Advancing Naturalistic Affective Science with Deep Learning

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Affective science Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1007/s42761-023-00215-z
Chujun Lin, Landry S. Bulls, Lindsey J. Tepfer, Amisha D. Vyas, Mark A. Thornton
{"title":"Advancing Naturalistic Affective Science with Deep Learning","authors":"Chujun Lin,&nbsp;Landry S. Bulls,&nbsp;Lindsey J. Tepfer,&nbsp;Amisha D. Vyas,&nbsp;Mark A. Thornton","doi":"10.1007/s42761-023-00215-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People express their own emotions and perceive others’ emotions via a variety of channels, including facial movements, body gestures, vocal prosody, and language. Studying these channels of affective behavior offers insight into both the experience and perception of emotion. Prior research has predominantly focused on studying individual channels of affective behavior in isolation using tightly controlled, non-naturalistic experiments. This approach limits our understanding of emotion in more naturalistic contexts where different channels of information tend to interact. Traditional methods struggle to address this limitation: manually annotating behavior is time-consuming, making it infeasible to do at large scale; manually selecting and manipulating stimuli based on hypotheses may neglect unanticipated features, potentially generating biased conclusions; and common linear modeling approaches cannot fully capture the complex, nonlinear, and interactive nature of real-life affective processes. In this methodology review, we describe how deep learning can be applied to address these challenges to advance a more naturalistic affective science. First, we describe current practices in affective research and explain why existing methods face challenges in revealing a more naturalistic understanding of emotion. Second, we introduce deep learning approaches and explain how they can be applied to tackle three main challenges: quantifying naturalistic behaviors, selecting and manipulating naturalistic stimuli, and modeling naturalistic affective processes. Finally, we describe the limitations of these deep learning methods, and how these limitations might be avoided or mitigated. By detailing the promise and the peril of deep learning, this review aims to pave the way for a more naturalistic affective science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"4 3","pages":"550 - 562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-023-00215-z.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-023-00215-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

People express their own emotions and perceive others’ emotions via a variety of channels, including facial movements, body gestures, vocal prosody, and language. Studying these channels of affective behavior offers insight into both the experience and perception of emotion. Prior research has predominantly focused on studying individual channels of affective behavior in isolation using tightly controlled, non-naturalistic experiments. This approach limits our understanding of emotion in more naturalistic contexts where different channels of information tend to interact. Traditional methods struggle to address this limitation: manually annotating behavior is time-consuming, making it infeasible to do at large scale; manually selecting and manipulating stimuli based on hypotheses may neglect unanticipated features, potentially generating biased conclusions; and common linear modeling approaches cannot fully capture the complex, nonlinear, and interactive nature of real-life affective processes. In this methodology review, we describe how deep learning can be applied to address these challenges to advance a more naturalistic affective science. First, we describe current practices in affective research and explain why existing methods face challenges in revealing a more naturalistic understanding of emotion. Second, we introduce deep learning approaches and explain how they can be applied to tackle three main challenges: quantifying naturalistic behaviors, selecting and manipulating naturalistic stimuli, and modeling naturalistic affective processes. Finally, we describe the limitations of these deep learning methods, and how these limitations might be avoided or mitigated. By detailing the promise and the peril of deep learning, this review aims to pave the way for a more naturalistic affective science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以深度学习推进自然主义情感科学。
人们通过各种渠道表达自己的情绪和感知他人的情绪,包括面部动作、肢体姿势、声乐韵律和语言。研究情感行为的这些渠道可以洞察情感的体验和感知。先前的研究主要集中在使用严格控制的非自然主义实验来研究孤立状态下情感行为的个体渠道。这种方法限制了我们在更自然的环境中对情绪的理解,在这种环境中,不同的信息渠道往往会相互作用。传统的方法很难解决这一限制:手动注释行为很耗时,不可能大规模进行;基于假设手动选择和操纵刺激可能会忽略意想不到的特征,从而可能产生有偏见的结论;而常见的线性建模方法无法完全捕捉现实情感过程的复杂、非线性和互动性质。在这篇方法论综述中,我们描述了如何应用深度学习来应对这些挑战,以推进更自然的情感科学。首先,我们描述了情感研究的当前实践,并解释了为什么现有的方法在揭示更自然的情感理解方面面临挑战。其次,我们介绍了深度学习方法,并解释了如何将其应用于应对三个主要挑战:量化自然主义行为、选择和操纵自然主义刺激以及建模自然主义情感过程。最后,我们描述了这些深度学习方法的局限性,以及如何避免或减轻这些局限性。通过详细说明深度学习的前景和危险,这篇综述旨在为更自然的情感科学铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Special Section Commentaries Affectivism and the Emotional Elephant: How a Componential Approach Can Reconcile Opposing Theories to Serve the Future of Affective Sciences A Developmental Psychobiologist’s Commentary on the Future of Affective Science Emotional Overshadowing: Pleasant and Unpleasant Cues Overshadow Neutral Cues in Human Associative Learning Emphasizing the Social in Social Emotion Regulation: A Call for Integration and Expansion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1