An Actionable Expert-System Algorithm to Support Nurse-Led Cancer Survivorship Care: Algorithm Development Study.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.2196/44332
Kaylen J Pfisterer, Raima Lohani, Elizabeth Janes, Denise Ng, Dan Wang, Denise Bryant-Lukosius, Ricardo Rendon, Alejandro Berlin, Jacqueline Bender, Ian Brown, Andrew Feifer, Geoffrey Gotto, Shumit Saha, Joseph A Cafazzo, Quynh Pham
{"title":"An Actionable Expert-System Algorithm to Support Nurse-Led Cancer Survivorship Care: Algorithm Development Study.","authors":"Kaylen J Pfisterer,&nbsp;Raima Lohani,&nbsp;Elizabeth Janes,&nbsp;Denise Ng,&nbsp;Dan Wang,&nbsp;Denise Bryant-Lukosius,&nbsp;Ricardo Rendon,&nbsp;Alejandro Berlin,&nbsp;Jacqueline Bender,&nbsp;Ian Brown,&nbsp;Andrew Feifer,&nbsp;Geoffrey Gotto,&nbsp;Shumit Saha,&nbsp;Joseph A Cafazzo,&nbsp;Quynh Pham","doi":"10.2196/44332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive models of survivorship care are necessary to improve access to and coordination of care. New models of care provide the opportunity to address the complexity of physical and psychosocial problems and long-term health needs experienced by patients following cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper presents our expert-informed, rules-based survivorship algorithm to build a nurse-led model of survivorship care to support men living with prostate cancer (PCa). The algorithm is called No Evidence of Disease (Ned) and supports timelier decision-making, enhanced safety, and continuity of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An initial rule set was developed and refined through working groups with clinical experts across Canada (eg, nurse experts, physician experts, and scientists; n=20), and patient partners (n=3). Algorithm priorities were defined through a multidisciplinary consensus meeting with clinical nurse specialists, nurse scientists, nurse practitioners, urologic oncologists, urologists, and radiation oncologists (n=17). The system was refined and validated using the nominal group technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four levels of alert classification were established, initiated by responses on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice survey, and mediated by changes in minimal clinically important different alert thresholds, alert history, and clinical urgency with patient autonomy influencing clinical acuity. Patient autonomy was supported through tailored education as a first line of response, and alert escalation depending on a patient-initiated request for a nurse consultation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Ned algorithm is positioned to facilitate PCa nurse-led care models with a high nurse-to-patient ratio. This novel expert-informed PCa survivorship care algorithm contains a defined escalation pathway for clinically urgent symptoms while honoring patient preference. Though further validation is required through a pragmatic trial, we anticipate the Ned algorithm will support timelier decision-making and enhance continuity of care through the automation of more frequent automated checkpoints, while empowering patients to self-manage their symptoms more effectively than standard care.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045806.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"9 ","pages":"e44332"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/44332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive models of survivorship care are necessary to improve access to and coordination of care. New models of care provide the opportunity to address the complexity of physical and psychosocial problems and long-term health needs experienced by patients following cancer treatment.

Objective: This paper presents our expert-informed, rules-based survivorship algorithm to build a nurse-led model of survivorship care to support men living with prostate cancer (PCa). The algorithm is called No Evidence of Disease (Ned) and supports timelier decision-making, enhanced safety, and continuity of care.

Methods: An initial rule set was developed and refined through working groups with clinical experts across Canada (eg, nurse experts, physician experts, and scientists; n=20), and patient partners (n=3). Algorithm priorities were defined through a multidisciplinary consensus meeting with clinical nurse specialists, nurse scientists, nurse practitioners, urologic oncologists, urologists, and radiation oncologists (n=17). The system was refined and validated using the nominal group technique.

Results: Four levels of alert classification were established, initiated by responses on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice survey, and mediated by changes in minimal clinically important different alert thresholds, alert history, and clinical urgency with patient autonomy influencing clinical acuity. Patient autonomy was supported through tailored education as a first line of response, and alert escalation depending on a patient-initiated request for a nurse consultation.

Conclusions: The Ned algorithm is positioned to facilitate PCa nurse-led care models with a high nurse-to-patient ratio. This novel expert-informed PCa survivorship care algorithm contains a defined escalation pathway for clinically urgent symptoms while honoring patient preference. Though further validation is required through a pragmatic trial, we anticipate the Ned algorithm will support timelier decision-making and enhance continuity of care through the automation of more frequent automated checkpoints, while empowering patients to self-manage their symptoms more effectively than standard care.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045806.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种可操作的专家系统算法,用于支持以护士为主导的癌症幸存者护理:算法开发研究。
背景:生存护理的综合模式对于改善护理的获取和协调是必要的。新的护理模式为解决癌症治疗后患者所经历的复杂的身体和心理问题以及长期健康需求提供了机会。目的:本文提出了我们的专家形成的、基于规则的生存算法,以建立一个护理生存护理模型,为患有癌症(PCa)的男性提供支持。该算法被称为无疾病证据(Ned),支持更及时的决策、增强的安全性和护理的连续性。方法:通过与加拿大各地的临床专家(如护士专家、医生专家和科学家;n=20)和患者合作伙伴(n=3)组成的工作组,制定并完善了初始规则集。算法优先级是通过与临床护士专家、护士科学家、执业护士、泌尿肿瘤学家、泌尿科医生和放射肿瘤学家(n=17)举行的多学科共识会议确定的。使用标称分组技术对系统进行了改进和验证。结果:建立了四个级别的警报分类,由用于临床实践调查的扩展前列腺癌症指数复合物的响应启动,并通过最小临床重要的不同警报阈值、警报历史和临床紧迫性的变化介导,患者自主权影响临床敏锐度。通过量身定制的教育作为第一反应线,并根据患者提出的护士咨询请求提高警报,支持患者自主性。结论:Ned算法有利于PCa护士主导的护理模式,具有较高的护士与患者比例。这种新的专家告知PCa生存护理算法包含一个定义的临床紧急症状升级途径,同时尊重患者的偏好。尽管需要通过务实的试验进行进一步的验证,但我们预计Ned算法将通过更频繁的自动化检查点的自动化来支持更及时的决策,并增强护理的连续性,同时使患者能够比标准护理更有效地自我管理症状。国际注册报告标识符(irrid):RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045806。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiences of a Digital Behavior Change Intervention to Prevent Weight Gain and Promote Risk-Reducing Health Behaviors for Women Aged 18 to 35 Years at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: Qualitative Interview Study. Scope, Findability, and Quality of Information About Music-Based Interventions in Oncology: Quantitative Content Analysis of Public-Facing Websites at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers. Oral Cancer Incidence Among Adult Males With Current or Former Use of Cigarettes or Smokeless Tobacco: Population-Based Study. Uncovering the Daily Experiences of People Living With Advanced Cancer Using an Experience Sampling Method Questionnaire: Development, Content Validation, and Optimization Study. Impact of Patient Personality on Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications: An Opportunity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1