Relationships Between Cultural Factors and Engaging in Guided Imagery and Music: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Music Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1093/jmt/thad022
Nami Yoshihara, Alberto Acebes-de-Pablo, Tim Honig
{"title":"Relationships Between Cultural Factors and Engaging in Guided Imagery and Music: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.","authors":"Nami Yoshihara, Alberto Acebes-de-Pablo, Tim Honig","doi":"10.1093/jmt/thad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guided Imagery and Music (GIM) is now practiced and taught on every inhabited continent. With this international growth of GIM, both GIM therapists and clients have unique cultural backgrounds that are often different from the US American context in which the method was originally developed. According to this reality, we undertook a cross-cultural study to explore how cultural factors relate to ways in which GIM clients engage in the therapeutic process. This research study is based on a qualitative and interpretivist approach that utilized thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. Six GIM advanced trainees from three countries (Japan, Spain, and the US) participated in the study. Eight themes emerged that describe significant cultural factors that affected the initial stages of engaging in GIM as clients: personal experiences with non-ordinary states of consciousness (NOSC); spirituality; physical distance; linguistic expression; professional/academic background; socio-economic aspects; social norms/expectations; and non-directive facilitation/attitudes. The first seven of these themes constituted aspects of the participants' individual sociocultural backgrounds that shaped their initial experiences of and expectations for GIM sessions and affected their GIM engagement. The eighth theme emerged as a transcultural factor in which a non-directive approach used by their GIM therapists allowed participants to engage in GIM more readily and form a new set of norms and expectations within their GIM sessions. Our research suggests that as participants developed a new set of norms and expectations as they acclimated to GIM, the therapist's non-directive stance provided a bridge between these two sets of social or cultural norms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"34-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thad022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guided Imagery and Music (GIM) is now practiced and taught on every inhabited continent. With this international growth of GIM, both GIM therapists and clients have unique cultural backgrounds that are often different from the US American context in which the method was originally developed. According to this reality, we undertook a cross-cultural study to explore how cultural factors relate to ways in which GIM clients engage in the therapeutic process. This research study is based on a qualitative and interpretivist approach that utilized thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. Six GIM advanced trainees from three countries (Japan, Spain, and the US) participated in the study. Eight themes emerged that describe significant cultural factors that affected the initial stages of engaging in GIM as clients: personal experiences with non-ordinary states of consciousness (NOSC); spirituality; physical distance; linguistic expression; professional/academic background; socio-economic aspects; social norms/expectations; and non-directive facilitation/attitudes. The first seven of these themes constituted aspects of the participants' individual sociocultural backgrounds that shaped their initial experiences of and expectations for GIM sessions and affected their GIM engagement. The eighth theme emerged as a transcultural factor in which a non-directive approach used by their GIM therapists allowed participants to engage in GIM more readily and form a new set of norms and expectations within their GIM sessions. Our research suggests that as participants developed a new set of norms and expectations as they acclimated to GIM, the therapist's non-directive stance provided a bridge between these two sets of social or cultural norms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化因素与参与引导意象和音乐之间的关系:一项探索性的定性研究。
引导图像与音乐(GIM)现在在每个有人居住的大陆上都有实践和教学。随着GIM的国际化发展,GIM治疗师和客户都有着独特的文化背景,这些背景往往与该方法最初开发的美国背景不同。根据这一现实,我们进行了一项跨文化研究,探讨文化因素如何与GIM客户参与治疗过程的方式相关。本研究基于定性和解释主义方法,利用半结构化访谈的主题分析。来自三个国家(日本、西班牙和美国)的六名GIM高级学员参加了这项研究。出现了八个主题,描述了影响作为客户参与GIM初始阶段的重要文化因素:非普通意识状态的个人经历(NOSC);精神;物理距离;语言表达;专业/学术背景;社会经济方面;社会规范/期望;以及非指导性便利/态度。这些主题中的前七个构成了参与者个人社会文化背景的各个方面,这些背景塑造了他们对全球信息管理会议的最初体验和期望,并影响了他们的全球信息管理参与。第八个主题是作为一个跨文化因素出现的,在这个因素中,他们的GIM治疗师使用的非指导性方法使参与者能够更容易地参与GIM,并在GIM课程中形成一套新的规范和期望。我们的研究表明,随着参与者在适应GIM的过程中形成了一套新的规范和期望,治疗师的非指导性立场在这两套社会或文化规范之间架起了一座桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Music Therapy
Journal of Music Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Community, Connection, and the Essential Role of Music Therapy. Developing Music Therapy in Maternity Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study Scoping Review of Music Interventions Aimed at Improving Reading Skills in Children with Specific Learning Disorders in Reading. Telehealth Engaged Music for Pain Outcomes: A Music and Imagery Proof-of-concept Study with Veterans. Professional Development and Learning Through the Research Process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1