Patient perspectives on a proposed pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Translational Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibad057
Renée M Ferrari, Dana L Atkins, Mary Wangen, Catherine L Rohweder, Austin R Waters, Sara Correa, Jennifer Richmond, Dillon van Rensburg, Annika Ittes, Olufeyisayo Odebunmi, Rachel B Issaka, Rachel Ceballos, Parth D Shah, Stephanie B Wheeler, Alison T Brenner
{"title":"Patient perspectives on a proposed pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.","authors":"Renée M Ferrari, Dana L Atkins, Mary Wangen, Catherine L Rohweder, Austin R Waters, Sara Correa, Jennifer Richmond, Dillon van Rensburg, Annika Ittes, Olufeyisayo Odebunmi, Rachel B Issaka, Rachel Ceballos, Parth D Shah, Stephanie B Wheeler, Alison T Brenner","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibad057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and preventable cancer. CRC screening is underutilized, particularly within medically underserved communities. Most interventions aimed at increasing CRC screening are delivered through primary care clinics. Pharmacies are more accessible than traditional primary care settings and may be ideally suited for delivering CRC screening and increasing access. Fecal immunochemical test is an at-home, stool-based CRC screening test that could be distributed through pharmacies. The purpose of our study was to assess patient perspectives on receiving fecal immunochemical test-based CRC screening through pharmacies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants residing in North Carolina and Washington. Interviews explored acceptability and intervention design preferences for a pharmacy-based CRC screening program. The interview guide was informed by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were conducted at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Patients perceived a pharmacy-based CRC screening program to be highly acceptable, citing factors such as ease of pharmacy access and avoiding co-pays for an office visit. Some concerns about privacy and coordination with patients' primary care provider tempered acceptability. Trust and positive relationships with providers and pharmacists as well as seamless care across the CRC screening continuum also were viewed as important. Patients viewed pharmacy-based CRC screening as an acceptable option for CRC screening. To improve programmatic success, it will be important to ensure privacy, determine how communication between the pharmacy and the patient's provider will take place, and establish closed-loop care, particularly for patients with abnormal results.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"909-918"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibad057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and preventable cancer. CRC screening is underutilized, particularly within medically underserved communities. Most interventions aimed at increasing CRC screening are delivered through primary care clinics. Pharmacies are more accessible than traditional primary care settings and may be ideally suited for delivering CRC screening and increasing access. Fecal immunochemical test is an at-home, stool-based CRC screening test that could be distributed through pharmacies. The purpose of our study was to assess patient perspectives on receiving fecal immunochemical test-based CRC screening through pharmacies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants residing in North Carolina and Washington. Interviews explored acceptability and intervention design preferences for a pharmacy-based CRC screening program. The interview guide was informed by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were conducted at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Patients perceived a pharmacy-based CRC screening program to be highly acceptable, citing factors such as ease of pharmacy access and avoiding co-pays for an office visit. Some concerns about privacy and coordination with patients' primary care provider tempered acceptability. Trust and positive relationships with providers and pharmacists as well as seamless care across the CRC screening continuum also were viewed as important. Patients viewed pharmacy-based CRC screening as an acceptable option for CRC screening. To improve programmatic success, it will be important to ensure privacy, determine how communication between the pharmacy and the patient's provider will take place, and establish closed-loop care, particularly for patients with abnormal results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对拟议的基于药物的癌症结直肠癌筛查计划的看法。
癌症是一种常见且可预防的癌症。CRC筛查没有得到充分利用,特别是在医疗服务不足的社区。大多数旨在增加CRC筛查的干预措施都是通过初级保健诊所提供的。药房比传统的初级保健环境更容易获得,可能非常适合提供CRC筛查和增加获得机会。粪便免疫化学测试是一种在家进行的基于粪便的CRC筛查测试,可以通过药店分发。我们研究的目的是评估患者对通过药店接受基于粪便免疫化学测试的CRC筛查的看法。我们对居住在北卡罗来纳州和华盛顿州的参与者进行了半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了基于药房的CRC筛查项目的可接受性和干预设计偏好。访谈指南由Andersen的医疗保健利用模型和理论领域框架提供。访谈在北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校和弗雷德·哈钦森癌症研究中心进行,录音并转录。患者认为基于药房的CRC筛查计划是高度可接受的,理由是药房的便利性和避免办公室就诊的共同付费等因素。一些对隐私和与患者初级保健提供者协调的担忧降低了可接受性。与提供者和药剂师的信任和积极关系,以及CRC筛查过程中的无缝护理也被认为是重要的。患者认为基于药物的CRC筛查是CRC筛查的一种可接受的选择。为了提高计划的成功率,重要的是要确保隐私,确定药房和患者提供者之间的沟通方式,并建立闭环护理,特别是对结果异常的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
期刊最新文献
Differing conceptual maps of skills for implementing evidence-based interventions held by community-based organization practitioners and academics: A multidimensional scaling comparison. Impact of an internet-based insomnia intervention on suicidal ideation and associated correlates in veterans at elevated suicide risk. Practitioner perspectives on equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and control. Scalable and successful patient portal lifestyle coaching training for primary care clinical staff. The development and evaluation of the Designing for Dissemination and Implementation Learning Hub.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1