{"title":"Follow-Up Adherence After Community Health Vision Screening Programs: A Review of the Literature.","authors":"Rebecca Zeng, Kara C LaMattina","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> Although the purpose of community eye screening programs is to reduce health care disparities, the effectiveness of these programs is limited by the follow-up adherence of their participants. The aim of this review is to investigate factors that may promote or hinder participants from attending follow-up ophthalmological exams after community eye screenings and identify interventions to increase follow-up rates. <b>Methods</b> For literature review, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Proquest/Global Health Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify studies of community eye screenings published between January 2000 and May 2023. Data from these articles were analyzed to identify barriers and facilitators of follow-up adherence after community eye screenings in the United States and to examine strategies used to increase follow-up rates. Only published manuscripts were included. We excluded studies of school screenings and clinic-based screenings. <b>Results</b> A total of 28 articles were included. Follow-up rates ranged from 12.5 to 89%. Nineteen articles reviewed facilitators and barriers to follow-up. Eighteen articles were non interventional and seven (see Table 1 and 2 , respectively) articles described interventions that were tested to improve follow-up rates after screening. Interventions included prescheduled appointments, transportation assistance, patient education, and patient navigators. <b>Conclusion</b> Several interventions are promising to increase follow-up adherence in community eye screenings, but more evidence is needed. Future research should focus on randomized trials of isolated interventions to improve follow-up adherence of disadvantaged populations, although this may be limited given ethical considerations and documented lack of follow-up after screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e223-e231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/55/10-1055-s-0043-1771354.PMC10547536.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective Although the purpose of community eye screening programs is to reduce health care disparities, the effectiveness of these programs is limited by the follow-up adherence of their participants. The aim of this review is to investigate factors that may promote or hinder participants from attending follow-up ophthalmological exams after community eye screenings and identify interventions to increase follow-up rates. Methods For literature review, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Proquest/Global Health Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify studies of community eye screenings published between January 2000 and May 2023. Data from these articles were analyzed to identify barriers and facilitators of follow-up adherence after community eye screenings in the United States and to examine strategies used to increase follow-up rates. Only published manuscripts were included. We excluded studies of school screenings and clinic-based screenings. Results A total of 28 articles were included. Follow-up rates ranged from 12.5 to 89%. Nineteen articles reviewed facilitators and barriers to follow-up. Eighteen articles were non interventional and seven (see Table 1 and 2 , respectively) articles described interventions that were tested to improve follow-up rates after screening. Interventions included prescheduled appointments, transportation assistance, patient education, and patient navigators. Conclusion Several interventions are promising to increase follow-up adherence in community eye screenings, but more evidence is needed. Future research should focus on randomized trials of isolated interventions to improve follow-up adherence of disadvantaged populations, although this may be limited given ethical considerations and documented lack of follow-up after screening.
客观的 尽管社区眼科筛查项目的目的是减少医疗保健差距,但这些项目的有效性受到参与者后续依从性的限制。本综述的目的是调查可能促进或阻碍参与者在社区眼科筛查后参加后续眼科检查的因素,并确定提高随访率的干预措施。方法 在文献综述中,检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Proquest/Global Health Library和Google Scholar数据库,以确定2000年1月至2023年5月期间发表的社区眼科筛查研究。对这些文章的数据进行分析,以确定美国社区眼科筛查后随访依从性的障碍和促进因素,并研究用于提高随访率的策略。只收录了已发表的手稿。我们排除了学校筛查和诊所筛查的研究。后果 共收录了28篇文章。随访率为12.5%至89%。19篇文章审查了后续行动的促进者和障碍。18篇文章是非介入性的,7篇文章(分别见表1和表2)描述了经过测试以提高筛查后随访率的干预措施。干预措施包括预先安排的预约、交通援助、患者教育和患者导航仪。结论 一些干预措施有望提高社区眼科筛查的随访依从性,但还需要更多的证据。未来的研究应侧重于孤立干预的随机试验,以提高弱势人群的随访依从性,尽管考虑到伦理考虑和筛查后缺乏随访的记录,这可能是有限的。