Axillary Surgical Attitude Changing with Retrospective Application of ACOSOG Z0011 Eligible Criteria: An Institutional Evaluation.

C Florin Pop, Lea Datin Nziki, Etienne El Helou, Michel Moreau, Magali Radermecker, Denis Larsimont, Isabelle Veys, Filip De Neubourg
{"title":"Axillary Surgical Attitude Changing with Retrospective Application of <i>ACOSOG Z0011</i> Eligible Criteria: An Institutional Evaluation.","authors":"C Florin Pop,&nbsp;Lea Datin Nziki,&nbsp;Etienne El Helou,&nbsp;Michel Moreau,&nbsp;Magali Radermecker,&nbsp;Denis Larsimont,&nbsp;Isabelle Veys,&nbsp;Filip De Neubourg","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-6-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) represents the gold standard for axillary surgical staging. The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) that could be avoided after retrospective application of the <i>ACOSOG Z0011</i> criteria and to evaluate the shortterm complications associated with axillary surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We reviewed breast cancer (BC) patients treated by primary breast-conserving surgery from 2012 to 2015. The percentage of SLNB vs ALND performed before and after the application of the <i>ACOSOG Z0011</i> criteria was calculated. Complications were analyzed using crosstabs, with <i>p</i><0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred fifty one patients with a median age of 59.3 years were included. BC tumors had a median size of 13 mm and were mostly unifocal (83.9%). There were 30.3% with 1-2 metastatic lymph nodes (MLN). ALND was performed in 44.2%. The patients with 1-2 MLN, had only SLNB in 14.5% of cases. By applying the <i>ACOSOG Z0011</i> criteria, ALND would have been avoided in 40.2% of patients. At least one postoperative complication was reported after SLNB or ALND for 45.7% and 74.7% of patients respectively. Seroma was the most frequent complication, and occurred in 29.3% of cases after SLNB and in 59.5% after ALND.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SNLB is the most commonly used axillary surgical staging procedure in this series (55.8%). With a retrospective application of the <i>ACOSOG Z0011</i> criteria in our population, ALND could have been avoided for 40.2% patients. Post-operative complications rate was higher after ALND, with a seroma rate at 59.5%.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546802/pdf/ejbh-19-318.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-6-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) represents the gold standard for axillary surgical staging. The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) that could be avoided after retrospective application of the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria and to evaluate the shortterm complications associated with axillary surgery.

Materials and methods: We reviewed breast cancer (BC) patients treated by primary breast-conserving surgery from 2012 to 2015. The percentage of SLNB vs ALND performed before and after the application of the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria was calculated. Complications were analyzed using crosstabs, with p<0.05 considered significant.

Results: Two hundred fifty one patients with a median age of 59.3 years were included. BC tumors had a median size of 13 mm and were mostly unifocal (83.9%). There were 30.3% with 1-2 metastatic lymph nodes (MLN). ALND was performed in 44.2%. The patients with 1-2 MLN, had only SLNB in 14.5% of cases. By applying the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria, ALND would have been avoided in 40.2% of patients. At least one postoperative complication was reported after SLNB or ALND for 45.7% and 74.7% of patients respectively. Seroma was the most frequent complication, and occurred in 29.3% of cases after SLNB and in 59.5% after ALND.

Conclusion: SNLB is the most commonly used axillary surgical staging procedure in this series (55.8%). With a retrospective application of the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria in our population, ALND could have been avoided for 40.2% patients. Post-operative complications rate was higher after ALND, with a seroma rate at 59.5%.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾性应用ACOSOG Z0011合格标准改变腋窝手术态度:一项机构评估。
目的:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是腋窝手术分期的金标准。本研究的目的是评估在回顾性应用ACOSOG Z0011标准后可以避免的腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)的比例,并评估与腋窝手术相关的短期并发症。材料和方法:我们回顾了2012年至2015年癌症(BC)患者接受原发性乳腺癌手术治疗的情况。计算应用ACOSOG Z0011标准前后进行的SLNB与ALND的百分比。使用交叉表分析并发症,结果:251名中位年龄为59.3岁的患者被纳入。BC肿瘤的中位大小为13mm,多为单灶性(83.9%),其中30.3%有1-2个转移性淋巴结(MLN)。有44.2%的患者进行了ALND。有1-2个MLN的患者中,14.5%的患者只有SLNB。通过应用ACOSOG Z0011标准,40.2%的患者可以避免ALND。分别有45.7%和74.7%的患者在SLNB或ALND后报告了至少一种术后并发症。血清瘤是最常见的并发症,发生在SLNB后的29.3%和ALND后的59.5%。结论:SNLB是该系列中最常用的腋窝手术分期程序(55.8%)。在我们的人群中回顾性应用ACOSOG Z0011标准,40.2%的患者可以避免ALND。ALND术后并发症发生率较高,血清瘤发生率为59.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying the SOUND Trial for Omitting Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in Bahrain. Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Before and After Breast-Cancer Diagnosis Among Young Women in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Dietary Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk: A KCPS-II Cohort Study. Effect of Flaxseed on Pain Relief and Quality of Life in Patients With Mastalgia: A Single Arm Interventional Study. Mastalgia and Why It Should Be Evaluated With Imaging in Areas Where Use of Breast Cancer Screening Services are Unsatisfactory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1