GP perspectives on a psychiatry phone line in Western Australia's Great Southern region: implications for addressing rural GP workload.

Beatriz Cuesta-Briand, Daniel Rock, Layale Tayba, James Hoimes, Hanh Ngo, Michael Taran, Mathew Coleman
{"title":"GP perspectives on a psychiatry phone line in Western Australia's Great Southern region: implications for addressing rural GP workload.","authors":"Beatriz Cuesta-Briand, Daniel Rock, Layale Tayba, James Hoimes, Hanh Ngo, Michael Taran, Mathew Coleman","doi":"10.1071/PY23039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental illness is a public health challenge disproportionately affecting rural Australians. GPs provide most of the mental health care, and they report increasing levels of burnout and unsustainable workload in the context of increased patient complexity. This may be more salient in rural settings characterised by resource constraints. In this paper, we use evaluation data from a GP psychiatry phone line established in Western Australia's Great Southern region in 2021 to describe GPs' perspectives on the service and reflect on how it may help alleviate rural GP workload.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample was recruited among GPs practicing in the region. Data were collected through an online survey and semistructured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the survey data. Interview data were subjected to thematic analysis; qualitative survey data were used for triangulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45GPs completed the survey and 14 were interviewed. Interview data yielded three themes: the criticality of timeliness; the building blocks of confidence; and trust. GPs were highly satisfied with the service, and timeliness and trust were the characteristics underpinning its effectiveness. The service built GPs' confidence in managing mental health and alcohol and other drug use issues through strengthening knowledge and providing reassurance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that a telephone line operated by trusted, local psychiatrists with knowledge of the local mental health ecosystem of support can reduce rural GP workload through building confidence and strengthening personal agency, helping GPs navigate the ethical and clinical labyrinth of managing patient complexity in rural settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":"NULL"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental illness is a public health challenge disproportionately affecting rural Australians. GPs provide most of the mental health care, and they report increasing levels of burnout and unsustainable workload in the context of increased patient complexity. This may be more salient in rural settings characterised by resource constraints. In this paper, we use evaluation data from a GP psychiatry phone line established in Western Australia's Great Southern region in 2021 to describe GPs' perspectives on the service and reflect on how it may help alleviate rural GP workload.

Methods: The sample was recruited among GPs practicing in the region. Data were collected through an online survey and semistructured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the survey data. Interview data were subjected to thematic analysis; qualitative survey data were used for triangulation.

Results: A total of 45GPs completed the survey and 14 were interviewed. Interview data yielded three themes: the criticality of timeliness; the building blocks of confidence; and trust. GPs were highly satisfied with the service, and timeliness and trust were the characteristics underpinning its effectiveness. The service built GPs' confidence in managing mental health and alcohol and other drug use issues through strengthening knowledge and providing reassurance.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that a telephone line operated by trusted, local psychiatrists with knowledge of the local mental health ecosystem of support can reduce rural GP workload through building confidence and strengthening personal agency, helping GPs navigate the ethical and clinical labyrinth of managing patient complexity in rural settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生对西澳大利亚大南部地区精神病学电话线的看法:对解决农村全科医生工作量的影响。
背景:精神疾病是一项公共卫生挑战,对澳大利亚农村地区的影响尤为严重。全科医生提供了大部分的心理健康护理,他们报告说,在患者复杂性增加的背景下,倦怠程度和不可持续的工作量不断增加。这在以资源限制为特征的农村环境中可能更为突出。在这篇论文中,我们使用了2021年在西澳大利亚大南部地区建立的全科医生精神病学电话线的评估数据,来描述全科医生对该服务的看法,并反思它如何有助于减轻农村全科医生的工作量。方法:在该地区执业的全科医生中招募样本。数据是通过在线调查和半结构化访谈收集的。描述性统计被用来分析调查数据。访谈数据经过专题分析;定性调查数据用于三角测量。结果:共有45名全科医生完成了调查,14人接受了访谈。访谈数据产生了三个主题:及时性的关键性;信心的基石;和信任。全科医生对这项服务非常满意,及时性和信任度是其有效性的基础。该服务通过加强知识和提供保证,建立了全科医生管理心理健康、酒精和其他药物使用问题的信心。结论:我们的研究结果表明,由信任的、了解当地心理健康支持生态系统的当地精神科医生运营的电话线可以通过建立信心和加强个人代理来减少农村全科医生的工作量,帮助全科医生在管理农村环境中患者复杂性的伦理和临床迷宫中前行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Views of nurses and midwives working in primary healthcare services on intimate partner violence against women. The perspectives of people living with dementia and their carers on the role of the general practice nurse in dementia care provision: a qualitative study. Attitudes towards models of abortion care in sexual and reproductive health: perspectives of Australian health professionals. Investigating behaviours and attitudes regarding recommended vaccination in adults 50 years and above in Australia. Providing a localised cervical cancer screening course for general practice nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1