Evaluating the Health of the Work Environment and the Perception of New Nurses During the Transition to Practice in Critical Care.

Paula Gellner, Justin DiLibero, Annette Griffin
{"title":"Evaluating the Health of the Work Environment and the Perception of New Nurses During the Transition to Practice in Critical Care.","authors":"Paula Gellner,&nbsp;Justin DiLibero,&nbsp;Annette Griffin","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New nurses are the major source of hiring for most hospitals. They fill vacancies left by seasoned nurses creating an experience-complexity gap. Turnover among new-graduate nurses is as high as 85% in the first 2 years.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to provide a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to turnover. The specific aims were (1) to better understand novice nurses' perceptions of their transition to critical-care practice and (2) to describe all eligible critical-care nurses' perceptions of a healthy work environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative descriptive design was used. Data were collected over 3 weeks in February 2022 from novice nurses (n = 12) who completed the Casey-Fink Nurse Experience Survey and from novice and experienced nurses (n = 47) who completed the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses' Healthy Work Environment Assessment Tool. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents to the Casey-Fink Nurse Experience Survey (n = 12) indicated feeling well supported by family, friends, and preceptors, although they felt less positive about prioritizing care, organizing patient needs, and recommending changes to the plan of care. The overall mean score on the Health Work Environment Assessment Tool was 2.99 (n = 47), indicating the need for improvement. Responses varied by unit, years of experience, and certification status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes to the evolving body of nursing knowledge and has provided a more detailed understanding of the health of the work environment and perceptions of new nurses during the transition to practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New nurses are the major source of hiring for most hospitals. They fill vacancies left by seasoned nurses creating an experience-complexity gap. Turnover among new-graduate nurses is as high as 85% in the first 2 years.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to provide a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to turnover. The specific aims were (1) to better understand novice nurses' perceptions of their transition to critical-care practice and (2) to describe all eligible critical-care nurses' perceptions of a healthy work environment.

Methods: A quantitative descriptive design was used. Data were collected over 3 weeks in February 2022 from novice nurses (n = 12) who completed the Casey-Fink Nurse Experience Survey and from novice and experienced nurses (n = 47) who completed the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses' Healthy Work Environment Assessment Tool. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Respondents to the Casey-Fink Nurse Experience Survey (n = 12) indicated feeling well supported by family, friends, and preceptors, although they felt less positive about prioritizing care, organizing patient needs, and recommending changes to the plan of care. The overall mean score on the Health Work Environment Assessment Tool was 2.99 (n = 47), indicating the need for improvement. Responses varied by unit, years of experience, and certification status.

Conclusion: This study contributes to the evolving body of nursing knowledge and has provided a more detailed understanding of the health of the work environment and perceptions of new nurses during the transition to practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估工作环境的健康状况和新护士在向重症监护实践过渡期间的认知。
背景:新护士是大多数医院招聘的主要来源。他们填补了经验丰富的护士留下的空缺,造成了经验复杂性的差距。新毕业护士的离职率在头两年高达85%。目的:本研究的目的是更深入地了解导致离职的因素。具体目的是(1)更好地了解新手护士对其向重症监护实践过渡的看法;(2)描述所有符合条件的重症监护护士对健康工作环境的看法。方法:采用定量描述性设计。数据是在2022年2月的3周内从完成Casey Fink护士经验调查的新手护士(n=12)和完成美国重症护理护士协会健康工作环境评估工具的新手和经验丰富的护士(n=47)收集的。使用描述性统计对数据进行分析。结果:Casey Fink护士经验调查的受访者(n=12)表示,他们在家人、朋友和导师的支持下感觉良好,尽管他们对优先考虑护理、组织患者需求和建议改变护理计划不太积极。卫生工作环境评估工具的总体平均得分为2.99(n=47),表明需要改进。答复因单位、经验年限和认证状态而异。结论:本研究有助于护理知识的发展,并对新护士在向实践过渡期间的工作环境健康和认知提供了更详细的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of a Standardized Process in Optimizing Appropriate Use of Progressive Care Unit Beds in a Tertiary Care Facility. End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Measurement in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest as a Predictor of Return of Spontaneous Circulation: A Literature Review. Lessons Learned From Ventilated and Proned Patients With COVID-19: A Multisite Retrospective Study to Identify Predictive Factors for Facial Pressure Injuries. Nursing Interventions and Intracranial Pressure Change in Pediatric Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Prevalence of Impostor Phenomenon Among Final-Semester Baccalaureate Nursing Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1