Protocol for Forearm Pronosupination Strength Measuring in Different Postures: Reliability and Influence of Relevant Factors.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.5014/ajot.2023.050238
Cristina Herrera Ligero, Daniel Sánchez Zuriaga, Úrsula Martínez Iranzo, Salvador Pitarch Corresa, Helios De Rosario
{"title":"Protocol for Forearm Pronosupination Strength Measuring in Different Postures: Reliability and Influence of Relevant Factors.","authors":"Cristina Herrera Ligero,&nbsp;Daniel Sánchez Zuriaga,&nbsp;Úrsula Martínez Iranzo,&nbsp;Salvador Pitarch Corresa,&nbsp;Helios De Rosario","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2023.050238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Despite the importance of pronosupination strength, which is key in daily activities, current evaluation protocols are disparate, and results differ regarding the influence of factors such as gender, age, limb dominance, or posture.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To design a reliable device to measure pronation and supination torques in different forearm positions, considering the influence of gender, age, and limb dominance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Reliability study with analysis of intrarater and interrater repeatability and examination of the influence of different factors on the strength of pronation and supination.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Biomechanical analysis laboratory of the Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Convenience sample of 39 healthy male and female participants, ages 18 to 65 yr.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Pronation strength and supination strength were studied in five forearm positions: 30° and 60° of supination, neutral rotation, and 30° and 60° of pronation. The influence of gender, age, and limb dominance was studied using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were studied in 17 participants, and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated from three measurement sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for 60° of pronation, all ICCs ranged from .72 to .97. Gender, limb dominance, and posture significantly affected pronosupination strength (p < .05), with the highest supination strength at 60° of pronation and the highest pronation strength at 60° of supination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In using this reliable pronosupination torque assessment device and standardized protocol in the clinical setting, clinicians must consider the influence of gender, limb dominance, and forearm posture. What This Article Adds: The results of this study will allow occupational therapists to establish differences between patients' functionality in comparison with healthy individuals and to design recovery treatments and facilitate performance of manual tasks, considering which are the most advantageous positions to exert force. Furthermore, the developed device can be used to monitor the evolution of these torques in an objective and reliable manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Despite the importance of pronosupination strength, which is key in daily activities, current evaluation protocols are disparate, and results differ regarding the influence of factors such as gender, age, limb dominance, or posture.

Objective: To design a reliable device to measure pronation and supination torques in different forearm positions, considering the influence of gender, age, and limb dominance.

Design: Reliability study with analysis of intrarater and interrater repeatability and examination of the influence of different factors on the strength of pronation and supination.

Setting: Biomechanical analysis laboratory of the Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia.

Participants: Convenience sample of 39 healthy male and female participants, ages 18 to 65 yr.

Outcomes and measures: Pronation strength and supination strength were studied in five forearm positions: 30° and 60° of supination, neutral rotation, and 30° and 60° of pronation. The influence of gender, age, and limb dominance was studied using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were studied in 17 participants, and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated from three measurement sessions.

Results: Except for 60° of pronation, all ICCs ranged from .72 to .97. Gender, limb dominance, and posture significantly affected pronosupination strength (p < .05), with the highest supination strength at 60° of pronation and the highest pronation strength at 60° of supination.

Conclusions and relevance: In using this reliable pronosupination torque assessment device and standardized protocol in the clinical setting, clinicians must consider the influence of gender, limb dominance, and forearm posture. What This Article Adds: The results of this study will allow occupational therapists to establish differences between patients' functionality in comparison with healthy individuals and to design recovery treatments and facilitate performance of manual tasks, considering which are the most advantageous positions to exert force. Furthermore, the developed device can be used to monitor the evolution of these torques in an objective and reliable manner.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同体位前臂旋前力量测量方案:可靠性和相关因素的影响。
重要性:尽管旋前力量是日常活动的关键,但目前的评估方案各不相同,在性别、年龄、肢体优势或姿势等因素的影响方面,结果也各不相同。目的:设计一种可靠的装置来测量前臂不同位置的旋前和旋后力矩,同时考虑性别、年龄和肢体优势的影响。设计:可靠性研究,分析评分器内和评分器间的重复性,并检查不同因素对旋前和旋后力量的影响。单位:巴伦西亚生物研究所生物力学分析实验室。参与者:39名健康男性和女性参与者的便利样本,年龄在18至65岁之间。结果和测量:研究了前臂五个位置的俯卧力量和仰卧力量:30°和60°的仰卧、中性旋转以及30°和60%的内旋。采用重复测量方差分析法研究了性别、年龄和肢体优势的影响。研究了17名参与者的评分者内和评分者间可靠性,并从三次测量中计算了组内相关系数(ICCs)。结果:除内旋60°外,所有ICCs均在.72~.97之间。性别、肢体优势和姿势显著影响旋前力量(p<0.05),旋前60°时旋后力量最高,旋后60°时的旋前力量最高。结论和相关性:在临床环境中使用这种可靠的旋前力矩评估设备和标准化方案时,临床医生必须考虑性别、肢体优势和前臂姿势的影响。这篇文章补充道:这项研究的结果将使职业治疗师能够确定患者与健康人功能之间的差异,并设计恢复治疗方法,促进手动任务的执行,考虑哪些是最有利的用力姿势。此外,所开发的装置可用于以客观可靠的方式监测这些转矩的演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
期刊最新文献
Educating the Educator: Applying a Growth Mindset Approach to Prepare Educators for Major Changes in Occupational Therapy Education. Predictive Factors of State Licensure Board Disciplinary Actions in Occupational Therapy. The Hand Accumulation aNd Dexterity FUnctional Limits-Shriners (HANDFULS): A New Clinically Feasible Measure of Hand Volume and In-Hand Manipulation for Children. Bimanual Arm Trainer Versus Traditional Occupational Therapy Services in Upper Extremity Function. Abortion Law Changes and Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1