The Impact of Surgical Timing of Hip Fracture on Mortality: Do the Cause and Duration of Delay Matter?

Hip & pelvis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-06 DOI:10.5371/hp.2023.35.3.206
Jaiben George, Vijay Sharma, Kamran Farooque, Samarth Mittal, Vivek Trikha, Rajesh Malhotra
{"title":"The Impact of Surgical Timing of Hip Fracture on Mortality: Do the Cause and Duration of Delay Matter?","authors":"Jaiben George,&nbsp;Vijay Sharma,&nbsp;Kamran Farooque,&nbsp;Samarth Mittal,&nbsp;Vivek Trikha,&nbsp;Rajesh Malhotra","doi":"10.5371/hp.2023.35.3.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Delay in performance of hip fracture surgery can be caused by medical and/or administrative reasons. Although early surgery is recommended, it is unclear what constitutes a delayed surgery and whether the impact of delayed surgery can differ depending on the reason for the delay.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 269 consecutive hip fracture patients over 50 years of age who underwent surgery were prospectively enrolled. They were divided into two groups: early and delayed (time from reaching the hospital to surgery less than or more than 48 hours). Patients were also categorized as fit or unfit based on anesthetic fitness. One-year mortality was recorded, and regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of delay on mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 153 patients (56.9%) had delayed surgery with a mean time to surgery of 87±70 hours. A total of 115 patients (42.8%) were considered medically fit to undergo surgery. No difference in one-year mortality was observed between patients with early surgery and those with delayed surgery (<i>P</i>=0.854). However, when assessment of the time to surgery was performed in a continuous manner, mortality increased with prolonged time to surgery, particularly in unfit patients, and higher mortality was observed when the delay exceeded six days (fit: <i>P</i>=0.117; unfit: <i>P</i>=0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of delay on mortality was predominantly observed in patients who were not considered medically fit, suggesting that surgical delays might have a greater impact on patients with medical reasons for delay.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"35 3","pages":"206-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/74/hp-35-206.PMC10505843.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2023.35.3.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Delay in performance of hip fracture surgery can be caused by medical and/or administrative reasons. Although early surgery is recommended, it is unclear what constitutes a delayed surgery and whether the impact of delayed surgery can differ depending on the reason for the delay.

Materials and methods: A total of 269 consecutive hip fracture patients over 50 years of age who underwent surgery were prospectively enrolled. They were divided into two groups: early and delayed (time from reaching the hospital to surgery less than or more than 48 hours). Patients were also categorized as fit or unfit based on anesthetic fitness. One-year mortality was recorded, and regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of delay on mortality.

Results: A total of 153 patients (56.9%) had delayed surgery with a mean time to surgery of 87±70 hours. A total of 115 patients (42.8%) were considered medically fit to undergo surgery. No difference in one-year mortality was observed between patients with early surgery and those with delayed surgery (P=0.854). However, when assessment of the time to surgery was performed in a continuous manner, mortality increased with prolonged time to surgery, particularly in unfit patients, and higher mortality was observed when the delay exceeded six days (fit: P=0.117; unfit: P=0.035).

Conclusion: The effect of delay on mortality was predominantly observed in patients who were not considered medically fit, suggesting that surgical delays might have a greater impact on patients with medical reasons for delay.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋部骨折手术时机对死亡率的影响:延迟的原因和持续时间重要吗?
目的:髋部骨折手术延迟可能是由于医疗和/或行政原因造成的。尽管建议早期手术,但尚不清楚什么是延迟手术,以及延迟手术的影响是否会因延迟原因而异。材料和方法:前瞻性纳入269名50岁以上连续接受手术的髋部骨折患者。他们被分为两组:早期和延迟(从到达医院到手术的时间小于或超过48小时)。根据麻醉适应度,患者也被分为适合或不适合。记录一年的死亡率,并进行回归分析,以评估延迟对死亡率的影响。结果:共有153例(56.9%)患者延迟手术,平均手术时间为87±70小时。共有115名患者(42.8%)被认为身体状况适合接受手术。早期手术患者和延迟手术患者的一年死亡率没有差异(P=0.854)。然而,当以连续的方式评估手术时间时,死亡率随着手术时间的延长而增加,尤其是在不适合的患者中,当延迟超过6天时,观察到更高的死亡率(适合:P=0.117;不适合:P=0.035)。结论:延迟对死亡率的影响主要发生在不适合医疗的患者身上,这表明手术延迟可能对有医疗原因的延迟患者产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors for Postoperative Stem Revision in Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Nationwide Outcomes Based on the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry. Factors Affecting Early Implant Subsidence after Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Femoral Stem for Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture. Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty with a Wiring Technique for Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in Elderly Patients. Clinical Outcomes of the Cephalomedullary Nail with Supplementary Screws versus Multiple Cannulated Screws for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young and Active Patients. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1