Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI:10.4055/cios22362
Hee Jung Son, Bong-Soon Chang, Sam Yeol Chang, Geunwu Gimm, Hyoungmin Kim
{"title":"Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Hee Jung Son,&nbsp;Bong-Soon Chang,&nbsp;Sam Yeol Chang,&nbsp;Geunwu Gimm,&nbsp;Hyoungmin Kim","doi":"10.4055/cios22362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To overcome several disadvantages of conventional laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), several types of minimally invasive surgery have been developed. The purpose of the present study was to report the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of spinous process-splitting decompression (SPSD) for DLSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-three consecutive patients underwent SPSD between September 2014 and March 2016. Of these, 42 (70 segments) who had at least 5 years of follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. The visual analog scale for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index, and walking distance without resting were scored to assess clinical outcomes at the preoperative and final follow-up. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the union status of the split spinous processes (SPs). For radiological outcomes, slip in the neutral position as a static parameter, anterior flexion-neutral translation, and posterior extension-neutral translation as a dynamic parameter were measured before and at the final follow-up after surgery. Spinopelvic parameters were also measured. Reoperation rate at the index levels was investigated, and predictive risk factors for reoperation were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Survival analysis was performed with reoperation as the endpoint to estimate the longevity of the SPSD for DLSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All clinical outcomes improved significantly at the final follow-up compared to those at the initial visit (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The clinical outcomes did not differ according to the union status of the split SP. There were no cases of definite segmental instability and no significant changes in the static or dynamic parameters after surgery. Sacral slope and lumbar lordosis increased, and pelvic tilt decreased significantly at the follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05), despite no significant change in the sagittal vertical axis. The mean longevity of the procedure before the reoperation was 82.9 months. Five patients (11.9%) underwent reoperation at a mean of 52.2 months after the SPSD. There were no significant risk factors for reoperation; however, the preoperative severity of foraminal stenosis had an odds ratio of 7.556 (<i>p</i> = 0.064).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPSD for DLSS showed favorable clinical and radiological outcomes at the mid-term follow-up. SPSD could be a good surgical option for treating DLSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/86/cios-15-800.PMC10551678.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios22362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To overcome several disadvantages of conventional laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), several types of minimally invasive surgery have been developed. The purpose of the present study was to report the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of spinous process-splitting decompression (SPSD) for DLSS.

Methods: Seventy-three consecutive patients underwent SPSD between September 2014 and March 2016. Of these, 42 (70 segments) who had at least 5 years of follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. The visual analog scale for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index, and walking distance without resting were scored to assess clinical outcomes at the preoperative and final follow-up. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the union status of the split spinous processes (SPs). For radiological outcomes, slip in the neutral position as a static parameter, anterior flexion-neutral translation, and posterior extension-neutral translation as a dynamic parameter were measured before and at the final follow-up after surgery. Spinopelvic parameters were also measured. Reoperation rate at the index levels was investigated, and predictive risk factors for reoperation were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Survival analysis was performed with reoperation as the endpoint to estimate the longevity of the SPSD for DLSS.

Results: All clinical outcomes improved significantly at the final follow-up compared to those at the initial visit (p < 0.05). The clinical outcomes did not differ according to the union status of the split SP. There were no cases of definite segmental instability and no significant changes in the static or dynamic parameters after surgery. Sacral slope and lumbar lordosis increased, and pelvic tilt decreased significantly at the follow-up (p < 0.05), despite no significant change in the sagittal vertical axis. The mean longevity of the procedure before the reoperation was 82.9 months. Five patients (11.9%) underwent reoperation at a mean of 52.2 months after the SPSD. There were no significant risk factors for reoperation; however, the preoperative severity of foraminal stenosis had an odds ratio of 7.556 (p = 0.064).

Conclusions: SPSD for DLSS showed favorable clinical and radiological outcomes at the mid-term follow-up. SPSD could be a good surgical option for treating DLSS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棘突矢状突切开保肌腰后减压的中期疗效:至少5年随访。
背景:为了克服传统椎板切除术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)的几个缺点,已经开发了几种类型的微创手术。本研究的目的是报告棘突劈裂减压(SPSD)治疗DLSS的临床和放射学中期结果。方法:在2014年9月至2016年3月期间,连续73名患者接受了SPSD。其中,对42例(70个节段)至少随访5年的患者进行了回顾性分析。对背痛和腿痛的视觉模拟量表、Oswestry残疾指数和不休息步行距离进行评分,以评估术前和最终随访的临床结果。根据分裂棘突(SP)的结合状态进行亚组分析。对于放射学结果,在术前和术后最后随访时测量了作为静态参数的中立位滑动、作为动态参数的前屈中立平移和后伸中立平移。还测量了Spinopelvic参数。在指标水平上调查再手术率,并使用多变量逻辑回归评估再手术的预测风险因素。以再次手术为终点进行生存分析,以评估DLSS SPSD的寿命。结果:与初次访视时相比,所有临床结果在最终随访时都有显著改善(p<0.05)。临床结果根据分裂SP的结合状态没有差异。没有明确的节段不稳定病例,术后静态或动态参数也没有显著变化。随访时,尽管矢状垂直轴没有显著变化,但骶坡和腰椎前凸增加,骨盆倾斜显著降低(p<0.05)。再次手术前手术的平均寿命为82.9个月。5名患者(11.9%)在SPSD后平均52.2个月接受了再次手术。再次手术没有显著的危险因素;然而,术前椎间孔狭窄的严重程度的比值比为7.556(p=0.064)。结论:DLSS的SPSD在中期随访中显示出良好的临床和放射学结果。SPSD可能是治疗DLSS的良好手术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Atraumatic Sport-Related Medial Sesamoid Pain: Conservative Treatment Outcome and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features. Cemented Versus Uncemented Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: National Shoulder Arthroplasty Data from Türkiye. Comparison of Midterm Outcomes between All-Inside Arthroscopic and Open Modified Broström Procedures as Treatment for Chronic Ankle Instability. Does the Nonunion Rate of Atypical Femoral Fractures Differ According to Fracture Site?: A Meta-Analysis. Isolated Polyethylene Insert Exchange for Instability after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparable Survival Rates and Range of Motion and Improved Clinical Scores Regardless of Hyperextension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1