Multi-level protection of rights: India's Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 and the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Articles 12 and 14)

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101937
Brendan D. Kelly
{"title":"Multi-level protection of rights: India's Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 and the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Articles 12 and 14)","authors":"Brendan D. Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mental health law is a feature of mental health systems around the world, so legislative reform is an important way to advance compliance with the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). This paper provides an overview of India's Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 in the context of Articles 12 (‘Equal recognition before the law’) and 14 (‘Liberty and security of person’). Notwithstanding the potential of law to produce change, exclusive or disproportionate emphasis on law draws attention from other areas in need of equal if not greater reform, such as public education, mental health services, physical healthcare, social care networks, criminal justice systems, and gathering political backing for the profound reforms needed to transform the socio-economic landscapes in which mental illness develops, diagnoses are made, treatment is provided (or not provided), recovery occurs (or does not occur), and social citizenship is protected and promoted (or eroded and obstructed). There is a particular issue with misunderstandings of psychiatry in academic discussions of mental health legislation which appears to stem from lack of engagement with the full diversity of service-user views and the evidence base for psychiatric care. Greater recognition of upstream factors that shape both suffering and services would acknowledge that the decisions of politicians and service managers have a much greater impact on rights, especially the right to treatment and support, than the decisions of individual clinicians whose options are often very limited at the level of individual care. India's legislation seeks to address not only individual-level care, but also this higher level of reform through its articulation of an explicit ‘right to access mental healthcare and treatment’. Similar multi-level legislative reform elsewhere would increase cooperation from all stakeholders, improve compliance with the CRPD, and help move towards zero coercion in mental health services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mental health law is a feature of mental health systems around the world, so legislative reform is an important way to advance compliance with the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). This paper provides an overview of India's Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 in the context of Articles 12 (‘Equal recognition before the law’) and 14 (‘Liberty and security of person’). Notwithstanding the potential of law to produce change, exclusive or disproportionate emphasis on law draws attention from other areas in need of equal if not greater reform, such as public education, mental health services, physical healthcare, social care networks, criminal justice systems, and gathering political backing for the profound reforms needed to transform the socio-economic landscapes in which mental illness develops, diagnoses are made, treatment is provided (or not provided), recovery occurs (or does not occur), and social citizenship is protected and promoted (or eroded and obstructed). There is a particular issue with misunderstandings of psychiatry in academic discussions of mental health legislation which appears to stem from lack of engagement with the full diversity of service-user views and the evidence base for psychiatric care. Greater recognition of upstream factors that shape both suffering and services would acknowledge that the decisions of politicians and service managers have a much greater impact on rights, especially the right to treatment and support, than the decisions of individual clinicians whose options are often very limited at the level of individual care. India's legislation seeks to address not only individual-level care, but also this higher level of reform through its articulation of an explicit ‘right to access mental healthcare and treatment’. Similar multi-level legislative reform elsewhere would increase cooperation from all stakeholders, improve compliance with the CRPD, and help move towards zero coercion in mental health services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多级权利保护:2017年印度《精神卫生法》和联合国《残疾人权利公约》(第12条和第14条)。
精神卫生法是世界各地精神卫生系统的一个特点,因此立法改革是促进遵守联合国《残疾人权利公约》的重要途径。本文在第12条(“法律面前的平等承认”)和第14条(“人的自由和安全”)的背景下概述了2017年印度《精神卫生法》。尽管法律有可能带来变革,但对法律的排他性或过度强调引起了其他需要平等甚至更大改革的领域的关注,如公共教育、心理健康服务、身体保健、社会护理网络、刑事司法系统、,以及为必要的深刻改革争取政治支持,以改变精神疾病发展、诊断、治疗(或不提供)、康复(或不发生)以及社会公民身份受到保护和促进(或受到侵蚀和阻碍)的社会经济格局。在精神健康立法的学术讨论中,对精神病学的误解是一个特殊的问题,这似乎源于缺乏对服务使用者观点的充分多样性和精神病护理的证据基础的参与。如果更多地认识到影响痛苦和服务的上游因素,就会承认政治家和服务管理者的决定对权利,特别是治疗和支持权的影响要比临床医生个人的决定大得多,因为临床医生个人的选择在个人护理层面往往非常有限。印度的立法不仅寻求解决个人层面的护理问题,还寻求通过明确的“获得精神保健和治疗的权利”来解决这一更高层次的改革问题。其他地方类似的多层次立法改革将加强所有利益攸关方的合作,提高对《残疾人权利公约》的遵守程度,并有助于在心理健康服务中实现零胁迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Recent research involving consent, alcohol intoxication, and memory: Implications for expert testimony in sexual assault cases Comparison of sociodemographic, clinical, and alexithymia characteristics of schizophrenia patients with and without criminal records Assessing mental capacity in the context of abuse and neglect: A relational lens Mediating the court procedural justice–delinquency relationship with certainty perceptions and legitimacy beliefs RECAPACITA project: Comparing neuropsychological profiles in people with severe mental disorders, with and without capacity modification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1