External validation of the Moroccan Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal (CR29) module: Monocentric study.

Houda Bachri, Hajar Essangri, Nezha El Bahaoui, Amine Benkabbou, Raouf Mohsine, Anass Mohammed Majbar, Amine Souadka
{"title":"External validation of the Moroccan Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal (CR29) module: Monocentric study.","authors":"Houda Bachri,&nbsp;Hajar Essangri,&nbsp;Nezha El Bahaoui,&nbsp;Amine Benkabbou,&nbsp;Raouf Mohsine,&nbsp;Anass Mohammed Majbar,&nbsp;Amine Souadka","doi":"10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) outcomes are a focal endpoint of cancer treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To externally validate the Moroccan Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire (QLQ) for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (CR29).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both Moroccan Arabic modules of QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-C30 were administered to Moroccan CRC. Psychometric properties were retested by measuring Cronbach's alpha coefficient for reliability and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to examine test-retest reproducibility. The multitrait-scaling analysis was performed to demonstrate the validity of the instrument and known-groups comparison was used to test the score's ability to discriminate between different groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 221 patients were included in our study and 34 patients completed the questionnaire twice. The Urinary Frequency scale and Stool Frequency scale had good internal consistency with alpha Cronbach coefficients of 0.79 and 0.83 respectively, while the same coefficients were moderately lower for the Blood and Mucus in Stool scale (0.61) and the Body Image scale (0.67). The ICCs ranged from 0.88 to 1 indicating good to excellent reproducibility. In multitrait scaling analyses, the criterion for item convergent and divergent validity was satisfactory. The known-group comparison showed statistically significant differences between patients according to age, gender, stoma status, tumor location, and radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Moroccan Arabic version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 is a valid and reliable tool that can be used safely for research and clinical purposes in Moroccan CRC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94271,"journal":{"name":"World journal of methodology","volume":"13 4","pages":"259-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/07/WJM-13-259.PMC10523244.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QoL) outcomes are a focal endpoint of cancer treatment strategies.

Aim: To externally validate the Moroccan Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire (QLQ) for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (CR29).

Methods: Both Moroccan Arabic modules of QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-C30 were administered to Moroccan CRC. Psychometric properties were retested by measuring Cronbach's alpha coefficient for reliability and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to examine test-retest reproducibility. The multitrait-scaling analysis was performed to demonstrate the validity of the instrument and known-groups comparison was used to test the score's ability to discriminate between different groups of patients.

Results: In total, 221 patients were included in our study and 34 patients completed the questionnaire twice. The Urinary Frequency scale and Stool Frequency scale had good internal consistency with alpha Cronbach coefficients of 0.79 and 0.83 respectively, while the same coefficients were moderately lower for the Blood and Mucus in Stool scale (0.61) and the Body Image scale (0.67). The ICCs ranged from 0.88 to 1 indicating good to excellent reproducibility. In multitrait scaling analyses, the criterion for item convergent and divergent validity was satisfactory. The known-group comparison showed statistically significant differences between patients according to age, gender, stoma status, tumor location, and radiotherapy.

Conclusion: The Moroccan Arabic version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 is a valid and reliable tool that can be used safely for research and clinical purposes in Moroccan CRC patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲癌症结直肠研究和治疗组织(CR29)模块摩洛哥-阿拉伯版本的外部验证:单中心研究。
背景:生活质量(QoL)结果是癌症治疗策略的焦点。目的:外部验证欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)对癌症(CRC)患者(CR29)的生活质量问卷(QLQ)摩洛哥-阿拉伯语版本。方法:对摩洛哥结直肠癌患者使用QLQ-CR29和QLQ-C30摩洛哥-阿拉伯语模块。通过测量Cronbachα系数的可靠性和组内相关系数(ICC)来重新测试心理测量特性,以检查重新测试的再现性。进行多特征量表分析以证明仪器的有效性,并使用已知组比较来测试评分在不同患者组之间的区分能力。结果:共有221名患者被纳入我们的研究,34名患者完成了两次问卷调查。尿频量表和大便频率量表具有良好的内部一致性,α-克朗巴赫系数分别为0.79和0.83,而大便中的血液和粘液量表(0.61)和身体图像量表(0.62)的相同系数略低。ICCs范围为0.88-1,表明再现性良好。在多特质量表分析中,项目收敛和发散有效性的标准是令人满意的。已知的组比较显示,根据年龄、性别、造口状态、肿瘤位置和放疗,患者之间存在统计学上的显著差异。结论:摩洛哥-阿拉伯版本的EORTC QLQ-CR29是一种有效可靠的工具,可安全用于摩洛哥CRC患者的研究和临床目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anticoagulant use before COVID-19 diagnosis prevent COVID-19 associated acute venous thromboembolism or not: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Botulinum toxin type A for treating chronic low back pain: A double blinded randomized control study. Cluster sampling methodology to evaluate immunization coverage. COVID-19 mutations: An overview. Early versus delayed necrosectomy in pancreatic necrosis: A population-based cohort study on readmission, healthcare utilization, and in-hospital mortality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1