Improving Documentation of Pain Reassessment after Pain Management Interventions in the NICU.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2023-09-28 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000688
Smitha Israel, Sofia Perazzo, Morgan Lee, Rachel Samson, Parissa Safari-Ferra, Ranjodh Badh, Solomon Abera, Lamia Soghier
{"title":"Improving Documentation of Pain Reassessment after Pain Management Interventions in the NICU.","authors":"Smitha Israel,&nbsp;Sofia Perazzo,&nbsp;Morgan Lee,&nbsp;Rachel Samson,&nbsp;Parissa Safari-Ferra,&nbsp;Ranjodh Badh,&nbsp;Solomon Abera,&nbsp;Lamia Soghier","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonates exposed to painful procedures require pain assessment and reassessment using nonverbal scales. Nurses perform initial assessments routinely, but reassessment is variable. The goal was to increase pain reassessments in neonates with a previous score of 4 or higher within 60 minutes from 50% to 75% within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After identifying key drivers, we tested several interventions using the IHI's Model for Improvement. The outcome measure was the rate of reassessments within 1 hour after scoring ≥4 on the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS). Duration of time between scoring and intervention was documented. Interventions included electronic health record (EHR) changes, direct communication with bedside nurses through text messages and emails, in-person education, and a yearly competency module. The process measure was the number of messages/emails to staff. Sedation scores were the balancing measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline compliance was 50% with significant variability. A centerline shift occurred after the first intervention. After the first four interventions in the following 3 months, a 29% total increase occurred. Overall time-lapse between reassessments decreased from 102 to 90 minutes. Overall sedation scores decreased from -2.5 during the baseline to -1.7 during the sustain period. The goal of 75% pain reassessments was achieved and sustained for two years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated tools such as the trigger report provided data that increased noncompliance visibility. Real-time and personalized reminders and education improved awareness and set the tone for culture change. Electronic health record reminders for reassessments and standardized annual education helped in sustaining change.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonates exposed to painful procedures require pain assessment and reassessment using nonverbal scales. Nurses perform initial assessments routinely, but reassessment is variable. The goal was to increase pain reassessments in neonates with a previous score of 4 or higher within 60 minutes from 50% to 75% within 12 months.

Methods: After identifying key drivers, we tested several interventions using the IHI's Model for Improvement. The outcome measure was the rate of reassessments within 1 hour after scoring ≥4 on the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS). Duration of time between scoring and intervention was documented. Interventions included electronic health record (EHR) changes, direct communication with bedside nurses through text messages and emails, in-person education, and a yearly competency module. The process measure was the number of messages/emails to staff. Sedation scores were the balancing measure.

Results: Baseline compliance was 50% with significant variability. A centerline shift occurred after the first intervention. After the first four interventions in the following 3 months, a 29% total increase occurred. Overall time-lapse between reassessments decreased from 102 to 90 minutes. Overall sedation scores decreased from -2.5 during the baseline to -1.7 during the sustain period. The goal of 75% pain reassessments was achieved and sustained for two years.

Conclusions: Automated tools such as the trigger report provided data that increased noncompliance visibility. Real-time and personalized reminders and education improved awareness and set the tone for culture change. Electronic health record reminders for reassessments and standardized annual education helped in sustaining change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进NICU疼痛管理干预后疼痛再评估的记录。
背景:暴露在疼痛过程中的新生儿需要使用非语言量表进行疼痛评估和重新评估。护士定期进行初步评估,但重新评估是可变的。目标是在12个月内,将60分钟内既往评分为4分或更高的新生儿的疼痛重新评估从50%提高到75%。方法:在确定关键驱动因素后,我们使用IHI的改进模型测试了几种干预措施。结果指标是新生儿疼痛激动和镇静量表(N-PASS)评分≥4分后1小时内的再评估率。记录评分和干预之间的持续时间。干预措施包括电子健康记录(EHR)的更改、通过短信和电子邮件与床边护士的直接沟通、面对面教育和年度能力模块。流程衡量标准是发给员工的信息/电子邮件数量。镇静分数是衡量平衡的标准。结果:基线依从性为50%,差异显著。第一次干预后出现中心线偏移。在接下来的3个月里,经过前四次干预后,总人数增加了29%。重新评估之间的总时间间隔从102分钟减少到90分钟。总体镇静评分从基线时的-2.5下降到维持期的-1.7。实现了75%疼痛再评估的目标,并持续了两年。结论:触发报告等自动化工具提供的数据增加了违规行为的可见性。实时和个性化的提醒和教育提高了人们的意识,为文化变革定下了基调。重新评估的电子健康记录提醒和标准化的年度教育有助于维持变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Duplicate Inflammatory Marker Use. How Super Is Supertrack? Expediting Care of Fast-track Patients through a Pediatric Emergency Department. Integrating Emotional Health Assessments into Pediatric Care: Initial Learnings from an MOC Part 4 Activity. Focused Team Engagements to Enhance Interprofessional Collaboration and Safety Behaviors among Novice Nurses and Medical Residents. Sustainability of a PICU Situation Awareness Intervention: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1