Assessment of finger dexterity through the DIGITS joint tracking web application—An evaluation study with comparison to the nine-hole pegboard test

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.013
{"title":"Assessment of finger dexterity through the DIGITS joint tracking web application—An evaluation study with comparison to the nine-hole pegboard test","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hand dexterity is an important clinical marker after hand surgery as it can greatly impact one’s ability to perform their day-to-day activities. With the increased focus on remote patient monitoring after hand surgery, new technologies are required to remotely monitor hand dexterity.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to identify dexterity outcomes using the web application “DIGITS” and compare these outcomes to the nine-hole-pegboard test (NHPT).</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a two-part study with a pilot of our remote dexterity design using DIGITS followed by a validation study comparing DIGITS to a gold-standard metric of dexterity, NHPT. The pilot study recruited 42 healthy subjects<span> between the ages of 18–65 to perform a remote finger tapping exercise using DIGITS. The second part of the study included 50 subjects between the ages of 18–65. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and then completed three finger tapping sequences for 20 seconds using DIGITS and three trials of the NHPT with each hand. Correlational analyses were done to compare the DIGITS dexterity test with the NHPT.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four outcome measures to assess dexterity were identified, which included (1) total sequences completed in 20 seconds, (2) time to complete 10 sequences, (3) average frequency per sequence, and (3) sequence accuracy. Significant negative correlations were found with the NHPT and total sequences completed in 20 seconds in both dominant and non-dominant hand trials. Additionally, significant negative correlations were found between the NHPT and the time to complete 10 sequences and average frequency in the non-dominant hand trials.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study shows promising results for the use of DIGITS as a remote measure of hand dexterity. The total number of sequences completed significantly correlates with the NHPT and should be further explored in representative patient populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hand dexterity is an important clinical marker after hand surgery as it can greatly impact one’s ability to perform their day-to-day activities. With the increased focus on remote patient monitoring after hand surgery, new technologies are required to remotely monitor hand dexterity.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to identify dexterity outcomes using the web application “DIGITS” and compare these outcomes to the nine-hole-pegboard test (NHPT).

Study Design

Cross-sectional observational study.

Methods

This was a two-part study with a pilot of our remote dexterity design using DIGITS followed by a validation study comparing DIGITS to a gold-standard metric of dexterity, NHPT. The pilot study recruited 42 healthy subjects between the ages of 18–65 to perform a remote finger tapping exercise using DIGITS. The second part of the study included 50 subjects between the ages of 18–65. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and then completed three finger tapping sequences for 20 seconds using DIGITS and three trials of the NHPT with each hand. Correlational analyses were done to compare the DIGITS dexterity test with the NHPT.

Results

Four outcome measures to assess dexterity were identified, which included (1) total sequences completed in 20 seconds, (2) time to complete 10 sequences, (3) average frequency per sequence, and (3) sequence accuracy. Significant negative correlations were found with the NHPT and total sequences completed in 20 seconds in both dominant and non-dominant hand trials. Additionally, significant negative correlations were found between the NHPT and the time to complete 10 sequences and average frequency in the non-dominant hand trials.

Conclusions

This study shows promising results for the use of DIGITS as a remote measure of hand dexterity. The total number of sequences completed significantly correlates with the NHPT and should be further explored in representative patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过DIGITS关节跟踪网络应用程序评估手指灵活性与九孔钉板测试的比较评估研究。
背景:手的灵活性是手部手术后的一个重要临床标志,因为它会极大地影响一个人的日常活动能力。随着人们越来越关注手部手术后的远程患者监测,需要新技术来远程监测手的灵活性。目的:本研究的目的是使用网络应用程序“DIGITS”确定灵活性结果,并将这些结果与九孔钉板测试(NHPT)进行比较。研究设计:横断面观察性研究。方法:这是一项由两部分组成的研究,由一名飞行员使用DIGITS进行远程灵活性设计,然后进行验证研究,将DIGITS与灵活性的金标准指标NHPT进行比较。该试点研究招募了42名年龄在18-65岁之间的健康受试者,使用DIGITS进行远程手指敲击运动。研究的第二部分包括50名年龄在18-65岁之间的受试者。参与者完成了一份人口统计问卷,然后使用DIGITS完成了三次20秒的手指敲击序列,并用每只手进行了三次NHPT试验。进行相关分析,将DIGITS灵活性测试与NHPT进行比较。结果:确定了四种评估灵活性的结果指标,包括(1)在20秒内完成的总序列,(2)完成10个序列的时间,(3)每个序列的平均频率,以及(3)序列准确性。在显性和非显性手试验中,NHPT和20秒内完成的总序列均呈显著负相关。此外,在非优势手试验中,NHPT与完成10个序列的时间和平均频率之间存在显著的负相关。结论:本研究显示了使用DIGITS作为手灵活性的远程测量的有希望的结果。完成的序列总数与NHPT显著相关,应在具有代表性的患者群体中进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Force control of pinch grip: Normative data of a holistic evaluation. Digital wound assessment by hand specialists is moderately reliable. Dorsal blocking orthoses for proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries: A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of joint angle on patient outcomes. Understanding the implications of hand impairments in light of the International Classification of Function model. Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1