Person-centered strategies for delivering TB diagnostic services in Lima, Peru.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Public Health Action Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.5588/pha.23.0036
C M Yuen, A K Millones, D Acosta, I Torres, S Farroñay, J Jimenez, L Lecca
{"title":"Person-centered strategies for delivering TB diagnostic services in Lima, Peru.","authors":"C M Yuen, A K Millones, D Acosta, I Torres, S Farroñay, J Jimenez, L Lecca","doi":"10.5588/pha.23.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Setting: </strong>Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To close the gap in TB diagnosis, TB diagnostic services must match care-seeking preferences. We sought to identify preferred strategies for delivering TB diagnostic services and to determine whether preferences differ among demographic groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>During May 2022-January 2023, we recruited adults who recently initiated treatment for pulmonary TB. We used an object-case best-worst scaling instrument to assess the desirability of nine hypothetical strategies for delivering TB diagnostic services. A <i>t</i>-test was used to assess differences in preference scores between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 participants, the strategies with the highest preference scores were an integrated mobile unit offering screening for multiple conditions, expedited attention at the health center, and home-based screening. These were strongly preferred by 42%, 25%, and 27% of participants, respectively, and 80% of participants strongly preferred at least one of the three. Expedited attention at the health center scored more highly among people who experienced >2 months delay in TB diagnosis compared to those who experienced a more rapid diagnosis (0.37 ± 0.06 vs. 0.17 ± 0.06; <i>P</i> = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providing person-centered TB diagnostic services at diverse access points could help reach different populations, which could promote early diagnosis and help close the diagnosis gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":46239,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Action","volume":"13 3","pages":"112-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.23.0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Setting: Lima, Peru.

Objective: To close the gap in TB diagnosis, TB diagnostic services must match care-seeking preferences. We sought to identify preferred strategies for delivering TB diagnostic services and to determine whether preferences differ among demographic groups.

Design: During May 2022-January 2023, we recruited adults who recently initiated treatment for pulmonary TB. We used an object-case best-worst scaling instrument to assess the desirability of nine hypothetical strategies for delivering TB diagnostic services. A t-test was used to assess differences in preference scores between groups.

Results: Among 150 participants, the strategies with the highest preference scores were an integrated mobile unit offering screening for multiple conditions, expedited attention at the health center, and home-based screening. These were strongly preferred by 42%, 25%, and 27% of participants, respectively, and 80% of participants strongly preferred at least one of the three. Expedited attention at the health center scored more highly among people who experienced >2 months delay in TB diagnosis compared to those who experienced a more rapid diagnosis (0.37 ± 0.06 vs. 0.17 ± 0.06; P = 0.031).

Conclusion: Providing person-centered TB diagnostic services at diverse access points could help reach different populations, which could promote early diagnosis and help close the diagnosis gap.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秘鲁利马提供结核病诊断服务的以人为本的战略。
背景:秘鲁利马。目标:为了缩小结核病诊断的差距,结核病诊断服务必须与寻求护理的偏好相匹配。我们试图确定提供结核病诊断服务的首选策略,并确定不同人口群体的偏好是否不同。设计:在2022年5月至2023年1月期间,我们招募了最近开始治疗肺结核的成年人。我们使用了一个实物案例最佳-最差比例工具来评估提供结核病诊断服务的九种假设策略的可取性。使用t检验来评估各组之间偏好得分的差异。结果:在150名参与者中,偏好得分最高的策略是提供多种疾病筛查的综合移动单元、在健康中心加速关注和家庭筛查。分别有42%、25%和27%的参与者强烈倾向于这三种方法,80%的参与者强烈偏向于三种方法中的至少一种。与快速诊断的人相比,在结核病诊断延迟超过2个月的人中,在卫生中心的快速关注得分更高(0.37±0.06 vs.0.17±0.06;P=0.031)。结论:在不同的接入点提供以人为中心的结核病诊断服务可以帮助接触不同的人群,可以促进早期诊断,有助于缩小诊断差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Action
Public Health Action RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Launched on 1 May 2011, Public Health Action (PHA) is an official publication of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union). It is an open access, online journal available world-wide to physicians, health workers, researchers, professors, students and decision-makers, including public health centres, medical, university and pharmaceutical libraries, hospitals, clinics, foundations and institutions. PHA is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that actively encourages, communicates and reports new knowledge, dialogue and controversy in health systems and services for people in vulnerable and resource-limited communities — all topics that reflect the mission of The Union, Health solutions for the poor.
期刊最新文献
TB burden and diagnostic challenges at Sandaun Provincial Hospital in West Sepik Province of PNG, 2016-2021. TB-related technical enquiries received at the Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan, during COVID-19. Continuous quality improvement in a community-wide TB screening and prevention programme in Papua New Guinea. Effects of extrapulmonary TB on patient quality of life and recurrence. Impact of Truenat on TB diagnosis in Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1