Evaluation of sleep quality in faculty members of Isfahan university of medical sciences.

International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-08-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Zohre Naderi, Babak Amra, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Mohammad Emami Ardestani
{"title":"Evaluation of sleep quality in faculty members of Isfahan university of medical sciences.","authors":"Zohre Naderi,&nbsp;Babak Amra,&nbsp;Fatemeh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Mohammad Emami Ardestani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep disorders can significantly impair the quality of life and daily functions. Evaluating sleep quality can provide valuable information about working conditions. This study aims to evaluate the sleep quality of faculty members at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive-analytic study was conducted from 2020 to 2021, involving 106 faculty members from the medical school. A questionnaire collected demographic information, including age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), level of education, history of faculty membership, major, working hours during the day and night, residency place, and medical history. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Symptom Checklist-25 (SCL-25) questionnaire were used to assess participants' sleep quality. Data were compared between clinicians and basic science faculty members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSQI subtypes were examined among the participants. The total PSQI score was 6.20±3.4. A comparison of PSQI scores and subtypes based on age categories did not show any significant differences (P > 0.05 for all). Clinicians had significantly lower total PSQI scores (P=0.044), sleep latency (P=0.024), sleep disturbances (P=0.012), and daytime dysfunction (P=0.022). Additionally, clinicians had a lower severity of sleep latency (P=0.024), sleep disturbances (P=0.012), and total PSQI score (P=0.044). However, clinicians exhibited a higher intensity of daytime dysfunction (P=0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Faculty members exhibited a high prevalence of sleep disorders, with the most common disorders being sleep disturbance and high sleep latency. The prevalence of sleep disorders was higher among basic science faculty members compared to clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":94056,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509560/pdf/ijppp0015-0125.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sleep disorders can significantly impair the quality of life and daily functions. Evaluating sleep quality can provide valuable information about working conditions. This study aims to evaluate the sleep quality of faculty members at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS).

Methods: This descriptive-analytic study was conducted from 2020 to 2021, involving 106 faculty members from the medical school. A questionnaire collected demographic information, including age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), level of education, history of faculty membership, major, working hours during the day and night, residency place, and medical history. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Symptom Checklist-25 (SCL-25) questionnaire were used to assess participants' sleep quality. Data were compared between clinicians and basic science faculty members.

Results: PSQI subtypes were examined among the participants. The total PSQI score was 6.20±3.4. A comparison of PSQI scores and subtypes based on age categories did not show any significant differences (P > 0.05 for all). Clinicians had significantly lower total PSQI scores (P=0.044), sleep latency (P=0.024), sleep disturbances (P=0.012), and daytime dysfunction (P=0.022). Additionally, clinicians had a lower severity of sleep latency (P=0.024), sleep disturbances (P=0.012), and total PSQI score (P=0.044). However, clinicians exhibited a higher intensity of daytime dysfunction (P=0.022).

Conclusion: Faculty members exhibited a high prevalence of sleep disorders, with the most common disorders being sleep disturbance and high sleep latency. The prevalence of sleep disorders was higher among basic science faculty members compared to clinicians.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯法罕医学科学大学教员睡眠质量评估。
背景:睡眠障碍会严重损害生活质量和日常功能。评估睡眠质量可以提供有关工作条件的有价值的信息。本研究旨在评估伊斯法罕医学科学大学(IUMS)教职员工的睡眠质量。方法:这项描述性分析研究于2020年至2021年进行,涉及医学院106名教职员工。问卷收集了人口统计信息,包括年龄、性别、身高、体重、体重指数(BMI)、教育水平、教员历史、专业、白天和晚上的工作时间、居住地点和病史。匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和症状自评量表-25(SCL-25)问卷用于评估参与者的睡眠质量。数据在临床医生和基础科学教员之间进行了比较。结果:在参与者中检测了PSQI亚型。PSQI总分为6.20±3.4。基于年龄类别的PSQI评分和亚型的比较没有显示出任何显著差异(所有组均P>0.05)。临床医生的PSQI总分(P=0.044)、睡眠潜伏期(P=0.024)、睡眠障碍(P=0.012)和日间功能障碍(P=0.022)显著较低。此外,临床医生的睡眠潜伏期(P=0.024)、睡障碍(P=0.012中)和PSQI总分的严重程度较低。然而,临床医生表现出较高强度的日间功能障碍(P=0.022)。结论:教员表现出较高的睡眠障碍患病率,最常见的障碍是睡眠障碍和高睡眠潜伏期。与临床医生相比,基础科学教员的睡眠障碍患病率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI in central nervous system tumors, a narrative review. Extracellular vesicles and their therapeutic applications: a review article (part 2). Association of connexin36 with adherens junctions at mixed synapses and distinguishing electrophysiological features of those at mossy fiber terminals in rat ventral hippocampus. Benefits and quick adoption of the use of Sugammadex in a busy practice setting. Patterns of connexin36 and eGFP reporter expression among motoneurons in spinal sexually dimorphic motor nuclei in mouse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1