Extruded talus injuries are associated with significant complications: A double center series with minimum 1-year follow up

Q2 Health Professions Foot Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2023.102056
Sampat Dumbre Patil , Siddhartha Sharma , Mandeep S. Dhillon
{"title":"Extruded talus injuries are associated with significant complications: A double center series with minimum 1-year follow up","authors":"Sampat Dumbre Patil ,&nbsp;Siddhartha Sharma ,&nbsp;Mandeep S. Dhillon","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2023.102056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Extruded talus (ET) injuries are rare, but high-energy open pantalar dislocations. Literature on these injuries is sparse and optimal treatment protocols are ill defined. The current study documents the clinical and radiological outcomes in cases seen at 2 centers, in an attempt to determine whether surgeons should choose primary </span>reimplantation or primary talectomy and fusion for these injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with ET injuries were identified from the database of two hospitals. Baseline demographics and treatment details were evaluated, and patients were called for follow-up. Radiological evaluation was conducted, and function was evaluated by the AOFAS hindfoot score. Outcomes and complications were compared between patients who had undergone primary talectomy versus primary reimplantation. Predictors of poor functional outcomes were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Of 23 patients seen by us, 15 were available for follow-up at 45.7 ± 22.2 months. Of these 19 had undergone reimplantation and 4 had talectomy with tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis. The mean percentage AOFAS score was 66.2 ± 14.6 at follow up. </span>AVN<span> was noted in 5, ankle arthrosis<span> in 10, subtalar arthrosis in 4 and infection in 4 cases; no patient needed salvage arthrodesis during this time. There was no difference in baseline demographics, range of motion, AOFAS scores or complication rates between patients undergoing primary reimplantation versus primary talectomy. The number of complications per patient showed a negative, moderate correlation with the AOFAS score (Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.6, P value = 0.02).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite best treatment, ET injuries result in significant impairment of functional outcomes and complications. Within the numbers available, no difference in outcomes or complication rates was noted between primary reimplantation or talectomy. However, we recommend reimplantation as the treatment of first choice as this offers the chance to salvage the ankle joint and preserves bone stock for future fusion or arthroplasty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259223000974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Extruded talus (ET) injuries are rare, but high-energy open pantalar dislocations. Literature on these injuries is sparse and optimal treatment protocols are ill defined. The current study documents the clinical and radiological outcomes in cases seen at 2 centers, in an attempt to determine whether surgeons should choose primary reimplantation or primary talectomy and fusion for these injuries.

Methods

Patients with ET injuries were identified from the database of two hospitals. Baseline demographics and treatment details were evaluated, and patients were called for follow-up. Radiological evaluation was conducted, and function was evaluated by the AOFAS hindfoot score. Outcomes and complications were compared between patients who had undergone primary talectomy versus primary reimplantation. Predictors of poor functional outcomes were determined.

Results

Of 23 patients seen by us, 15 were available for follow-up at 45.7 ± 22.2 months. Of these 19 had undergone reimplantation and 4 had talectomy with tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis. The mean percentage AOFAS score was 66.2 ± 14.6 at follow up. AVN was noted in 5, ankle arthrosis in 10, subtalar arthrosis in 4 and infection in 4 cases; no patient needed salvage arthrodesis during this time. There was no difference in baseline demographics, range of motion, AOFAS scores or complication rates between patients undergoing primary reimplantation versus primary talectomy. The number of complications per patient showed a negative, moderate correlation with the AOFAS score (Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.6, P value = 0.02).

Conclusion

Despite best treatment, ET injuries result in significant impairment of functional outcomes and complications. Within the numbers available, no difference in outcomes or complication rates was noted between primary reimplantation or talectomy. However, we recommend reimplantation as the treatment of first choice as this offers the chance to salvage the ankle joint and preserves bone stock for future fusion or arthroplasty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挤压性距骨损伤与严重并发症相关:双中心系列至少1年随访。
背景:挤压性距骨(ET)损伤是罕见的,但高能量的开放性泛距骨脱位。关于这些损伤的文献很少,最佳治疗方案也不明确。目前的研究记录了在两个中心看到的病例的临床和放射学结果,试图确定外科医生是否应该选择初次再植入或初次距骨切除和融合治疗这些损伤。方法:从两家医院的数据库中确定ET损伤患者。对基线人口统计和治疗细节进行了评估,并要求患者进行随访。进行放射学评估,并通过AOFAS后足评分评估功能。比较了接受初次距骨切除术和初次再植入术的患者的疗效和并发症。确定了功能不良结果的预测因素。结果:在我们看到的23例患者中,15例在45.7±22.2个月时可进行随访。其中19例接受了再植入术,4例接受了距骨切除术并进行了胫跟骨关节融合术。随访时AOFAS评分的平均百分比为66.2±14.6。AVN 5例,踝关节10例,距下关节4例,感染4例;在此期间,没有患者需要进行挽救性关节融合术。接受初次距骨再植入术和初次距骨切除术的患者在基线人口统计学、活动范围、AOFAS评分或并发症发生率方面没有差异。每位患者的并发症数量与AOFAS评分呈负中度相关(Pearson相关系数0.6,P值=0.02)。在现有数据范围内,初次再种植或距骨切除术的结果或并发症发生率没有差异。然而,我们建议将再次种植作为首选治疗方法,因为这为挽救踝关节提供了机会,并为未来的融合或关节成形术保留了骨储备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot
Foot Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of custom hard-shell 3D-printed foot orthoses in a cohort of patients who did not respond to treatment with custom ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) foot orthoses Regional changes in the free Achilles tendon volume in response to repeated submaximal contractions Mechanical drivers of intrinsic foot muscle for maximum toe flexor strength in upright standing across different body size Accuracy and reliability of the Ipswich touch test in identifying loss of protective sensation among diabetic patients Predictors of poor pre-operative patient reported outcome measures in elective foot and ankle surgery: Analysis of 1217 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1