Adapting the stages of implementation completion to an evidence-based implementation strategy: The development of the NIATx stages of implementation completion.

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2023-09-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895231200379
James H Ford, Mark E Zehner, Holle Schaper, Lisa Saldana
{"title":"Adapting the stages of implementation completion to an evidence-based implementation strategy: The development of the NIATx stages of implementation completion.","authors":"James H Ford, Mark E Zehner, Holle Schaper, Lisa Saldana","doi":"10.1177/26334895231200379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dissemination and implementation frameworks provide the scaffolding to explore the effectiveness of evidence-based practices (EBPs) targeting process of care and organizational outcomes. Few instruments, like the stages of implementation completion (SIC) examine implementation fidelity to EBP adoption and how organizations differ in their approach to implementation. Instruments to measure organizational competency in the utilization of implementation strategies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An iterative process was utilized to adapt the SIC to the NIATx implementation strategies. The new instrument, NIATx-SIC, was applied in a randomized controlled trial involving 53 addiction treatment agencies in Washington state to improve agency co-occurring capacity. NIATx-SIC data were reported by state staff and external facilitators and through participating agency documentation. Proportion and duration scores for each stage and phase of the NIATx-SIC were calculated for each agency. Competency was assessed using the NIATx fidelity tool. Comparisons of proportion, duration, and NIATx activities completed were determined using independent sample <i>t</i>-tests by agency competency level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NIATx-SIC distinguished between agencies achieving competency (<i>n</i>  =  23) and those not achieving competency (<i>n</i>  =  26). Agencies achieving competency completed a greater proportion of implementation phase activities and had a significantly longer Stage 7 duration. These agencies participated in significantly more individual and group coaching calls, attended more in-person meetings, implemented more change projects, and spent approximately 64 more days, on average, engaging in all NIATx activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Organizational participation in dissemination and implementation research requires a significant investment of staff resources. The inability of an organization to achieve competency when utilizing a set of implementation strategies waste an opportunity to institutionalize knowledge of how to apply implementation strategies to future change efforts. The NIATx-SIC provides evidence that competency is not an attribute of the organization but rather a result of the application of the NIATx implementation strategies to improve agency co-occurring capacity.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03007940. Registered January 2, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03007940.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"26334895231200379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/5e/10.1177_26334895231200379.PMC10510360.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895231200379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dissemination and implementation frameworks provide the scaffolding to explore the effectiveness of evidence-based practices (EBPs) targeting process of care and organizational outcomes. Few instruments, like the stages of implementation completion (SIC) examine implementation fidelity to EBP adoption and how organizations differ in their approach to implementation. Instruments to measure organizational competency in the utilization of implementation strategies are lacking.

Method: An iterative process was utilized to adapt the SIC to the NIATx implementation strategies. The new instrument, NIATx-SIC, was applied in a randomized controlled trial involving 53 addiction treatment agencies in Washington state to improve agency co-occurring capacity. NIATx-SIC data were reported by state staff and external facilitators and through participating agency documentation. Proportion and duration scores for each stage and phase of the NIATx-SIC were calculated for each agency. Competency was assessed using the NIATx fidelity tool. Comparisons of proportion, duration, and NIATx activities completed were determined using independent sample t-tests by agency competency level.

Results: The NIATx-SIC distinguished between agencies achieving competency (n  =  23) and those not achieving competency (n  =  26). Agencies achieving competency completed a greater proportion of implementation phase activities and had a significantly longer Stage 7 duration. These agencies participated in significantly more individual and group coaching calls, attended more in-person meetings, implemented more change projects, and spent approximately 64 more days, on average, engaging in all NIATx activities.

Conclusions: Organizational participation in dissemination and implementation research requires a significant investment of staff resources. The inability of an organization to achieve competency when utilizing a set of implementation strategies waste an opportunity to institutionalize knowledge of how to apply implementation strategies to future change efforts. The NIATx-SIC provides evidence that competency is not an attribute of the organization but rather a result of the application of the NIATx implementation strategies to improve agency co-occurring capacity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03007940. Registered January 2, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03007940.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使实施完成阶段适应循证实施战略:制定NIATx实施完成阶段。
背景:传播和实施框架为探索循证实践(EBP)针对护理过程和组织结果的有效性提供了框架。很少有文书,如实施完成阶段(SIC),审查实施对EBP采用的忠诚度,以及各组织在实施方法上的差异。缺乏衡量组织利用执行战略能力的工具。方法:采用迭代过程使SIC适应NIATx的实施策略。NIATx-SIC这一新仪器被应用于一项随机对照试验,该试验涉及华盛顿州的53家成瘾治疗机构,以提高机构的共同发生能力。NIATx SIC数据由国家工作人员和外部促进者以及参与机构的文件报告。计算每个机构NIATx SIC每个阶段和阶段的比例和持续时间分数。使用NIATx保真度工具评估能力。完成的比例、持续时间和NIATx活动的比较是通过机构能力水平的独立样本t检验确定的。结果:NIATx-SIC区分了实现能力的机构(n  =  23)和未达到能力(n  =  26)。达到能力的机构完成了更大比例的实施阶段活动,第7阶段的持续时间明显更长。这些机构参加的个人和团体辅导电话明显增多,参加的面对面会议增多,实施的变革项目增多,参与所有NIATx活动的平均时间增加了约64天。结论:组织参与传播和实施研究需要投入大量人力资源。一个组织在利用一套实施战略时无法实现能力,浪费了将如何将实施战略应用于未来变革工作的知识制度化的机会。NIATx SIC提供的证据表明,能力不是组织的属性,而是应用NIATx实施战略以提高机构协同能力的结果。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03007940。注册日期:2017年1月2日,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03007940.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a pilot implementation of a digital cognitive behavioral therapy platform for isolated older adults in county mental health services. Calculating power for multilevel implementation trials in mental health: Meaningful effect sizes, intraclass correlation coefficients, and proportions of variance explained by covariates. Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners. Are we being equitable enough? Lessons learned from sites lost in an implementation trial. Examining implementation determinants of a culturally grounded, school-based prevention curriculum in rural Hawai'i: A test development and validation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1