Parental Vaccine Hesitancy in a COVID-19 World: A Qualitative Study of Midwestern Parents' Decisions Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination for Their Children.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-24 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol16.20049
Simon D Beatty, Jamison B Macke, Kellie M Griffin, Jennifer A Villwock
{"title":"Parental Vaccine Hesitancy in a COVID-19 World: A Qualitative Study of Midwestern Parents' Decisions Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination for Their Children.","authors":"Simon D Beatty,&nbsp;Jamison B Macke,&nbsp;Kellie M Griffin,&nbsp;Jennifer A Villwock","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol16.20049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the launch of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines, a new cohort of people exists who do not consider themselves to be completely vaccine-hesitant, but are specifically COVID-19 vaccine hesitant (CVH). There is a need to learn from CVH parents, to ensure their concerns are addressed, and allow them to comfortably vaccinate their children against the COVID-19 virus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were used to identify CVH parents. Using semistructured interviews, we assessed the attitudes of CVH parents toward COVID-19 vaccination in children. An inductive coding method was used to analyze transcripts and develop themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen parents were interviewed. Seven (50%) had received the COVID-19 vaccine even though they had doubts. Six reported that education about mRNA vaccine production was helpful in deciding to get vaccinated. Parents were reluctant regarding pediatric vaccination due to lack of long-term studies and concerns about adverse impact on childhood development. Personal physicians were the most trusted source of information and direct conversations with them were the most influential, as opposed to public health leaders like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested that physicians are among the most trusted sources of information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine for CVH parents. Rather than use broad public health messaging and advertising to increase rates of vaccination, further investigation into training health professionals on how to counsel CVH patients effectively may be a higher impact area of opportunity to improve vaccine response rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"194-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/d1/16-194.PMC10544882.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.20049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the launch of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines, a new cohort of people exists who do not consider themselves to be completely vaccine-hesitant, but are specifically COVID-19 vaccine hesitant (CVH). There is a need to learn from CVH parents, to ensure their concerns are addressed, and allow them to comfortably vaccinate their children against the COVID-19 virus.

Methods: Surveys were used to identify CVH parents. Using semistructured interviews, we assessed the attitudes of CVH parents toward COVID-19 vaccination in children. An inductive coding method was used to analyze transcripts and develop themes.

Results: Fourteen parents were interviewed. Seven (50%) had received the COVID-19 vaccine even though they had doubts. Six reported that education about mRNA vaccine production was helpful in deciding to get vaccinated. Parents were reluctant regarding pediatric vaccination due to lack of long-term studies and concerns about adverse impact on childhood development. Personal physicians were the most trusted source of information and direct conversations with them were the most influential, as opposed to public health leaders like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health.

Conclusions: Our findings suggested that physicians are among the most trusted sources of information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine for CVH parents. Rather than use broad public health messaging and advertising to increase rates of vaccination, further investigation into training health professionals on how to counsel CVH patients effectively may be a higher impact area of opportunity to improve vaccine response rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎世界中的父母疫苗犹豫:中西部父母关于为子女接种新冠肺炎疫苗的决定的定性研究。
简介:随着SARS-CoV-2(新冠肺炎)疫苗的推出,一批新的人群并不认为自己完全对疫苗犹豫不决,但特别是新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫不决(CVH)。需要向CVH父母学习,以确保他们的担忧得到解决,并让他们轻松地为孩子接种新冠肺炎病毒疫苗。方法:采用问卷调查的方法确定CVH父母。通过半结构访谈,我们评估了CVH父母对儿童接种新冠肺炎疫苗的态度。使用归纳编码方法来分析转录本和开发主题。结果:14位家长接受了访谈。7人(50%)接种了新冠肺炎疫苗,尽管他们有疑问。Six报道称,有关信使核糖核酸疫苗生产的教育有助于决定接种疫苗。由于缺乏长期研究以及担心对儿童发育的不利影响,家长们不愿意接种儿科疫苗。私人医生是最值得信赖的信息来源,与他们的直接对话最具影响力,与美国疾病控制与预防中心和美国国立卫生研究院等公共卫生领导人相反。结论:我们的研究结果表明,医生是CVH父母最值得信赖的新冠肺炎疫苗信息来源之一。与其利用广泛的公共卫生信息和广告来提高疫苗接种率,不如进一步调查培训卫生专业人员如何有效地为CVH患者提供咨询,这可能是提高疫苗反应率的一个影响更大的机会领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of a Mediastinal Granuloma Related to Histoplasmosis with Streptococcus dysgalactiae Subspecies equisimilis Superinfection Resulting in Abscess and Subsequent Pericarditis in a Pediatric Patient. A Diagnosis of Trichoblastic Carcinoma Using Immunohistochemistry. Acute Border Zone Infarcts in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome. Clinical Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Iliopsoas Corticosteriod Injection for Hip Pain. Descriptive Evaluation in Outpatient Follow-Up of Direct LDL-C in Patients with Elevated Triglycerides and Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1