Distortional effects of separate accounting and formula apportionment on factor allocation.

Journal of business economics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s11573-022-01133-5
Regina Ortmann, Erich Pummerer
{"title":"Distortional effects of separate accounting and formula apportionment on factor allocation.","authors":"Regina Ortmann,&nbsp;Erich Pummerer","doi":"10.1007/s11573-022-01133-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examine distortions caused by tax base allocation systems-separate accounting (SA) or formula apportionment (FA)-with respect to the allocation of assets and workforce within multinational entities (MNEs). The effects of both systems are intensively debated by EU Member States as they are striving to implement a European tax system. Its introduction would lead to a switch from SA to FA. Moreover, Pillar One of the recent global tax reform includes a mix of both tax base allocation systems. We find that, against the claims of the EU, FA does not necessarily create lower distortions of the factor allocation. Decisive for that assessment is the level of profit shifting under SA. Our results indicate that, in tendency, the factor allocation is more severely distorted by FA when the profit shifting possibilities were rather low under SA. In contrast to former studies, we highlight the importance of analyzing the status quo under the recently applied system (SA) in order to be able to assess the consequences of a switch from SA to FA. Our results are interesting for policy-makers as they help anticipating reactions of MNEs to a change in the applied tax base allocation system and for companies as a basis for future tax planning.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11573-022-01133-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":94069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of business economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of business economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01133-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine distortions caused by tax base allocation systems-separate accounting (SA) or formula apportionment (FA)-with respect to the allocation of assets and workforce within multinational entities (MNEs). The effects of both systems are intensively debated by EU Member States as they are striving to implement a European tax system. Its introduction would lead to a switch from SA to FA. Moreover, Pillar One of the recent global tax reform includes a mix of both tax base allocation systems. We find that, against the claims of the EU, FA does not necessarily create lower distortions of the factor allocation. Decisive for that assessment is the level of profit shifting under SA. Our results indicate that, in tendency, the factor allocation is more severely distorted by FA when the profit shifting possibilities were rather low under SA. In contrast to former studies, we highlight the importance of analyzing the status quo under the recently applied system (SA) in order to be able to assess the consequences of a switch from SA to FA. Our results are interesting for policy-makers as they help anticipating reactions of MNEs to a change in the applied tax base allocation system and for companies as a basis for future tax planning.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11573-022-01133-5.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单独核算和公式分配对要素分配的扭曲效应。
我们研究了税基分配制度——独立会计(SA)或公式分配(FA)——在跨国实体(MNE)内资产和劳动力分配方面造成的扭曲。欧盟成员国在努力实施欧洲税收制度时,对这两种制度的影响进行了激烈的辩论。它的引入将导致从SA向FA的转变。此外,最近全球税收改革的第一支柱包括两种税基分配系统的混合。我们发现,与欧盟的说法相反,FA并不一定会降低要素分配的扭曲程度。该评估的决定性因素是SA下的利润转移水平。我们的结果表明,在SA下,当利润转移的可能性相当低时,FA会更严重地扭曲因素分配。与以前的研究相比,我们强调了在最近应用的制度(SA)下分析现状的重要性,以便能够评估从SA转换为FA的后果。我们的结果对决策者来说很有趣,因为它们有助于预测跨国公司对应用的税基分配制度的变化的反应,并将其作为公司未来税收规划的基础。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,请访问10.1007/11573-022-01133-5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auditors and client investment efficiency: a quasi-replication and further insights from a regulatory change How consistent are measures of financial liberalization in assessing its impact on bank cost efficiency? A cross–country empirical analysis A proactive transshipment model for prototype parts logistics in the automotive industry Improving supply chain planning for perishable food: data-driven implications for waste prevention Is more always better with respect to entrepreneurial self-efficacy? An experimental investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1