Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Cytological and Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens in Association with EGFR Mutation and Overall Survival: A Single-Institution Experience.

IF 2.1 Q4 PATHOLOGY Turkish Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5146/tjpath.2022.01572
Elif Sayman Gokal, Fugen Vardar Aker, Zuhal Kus Silav, Bala Basak Oven
{"title":"Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Cytological and Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens in Association with EGFR Mutation and Overall Survival: A Single-Institution Experience.","authors":"Elif Sayman Gokal,&nbsp;Fugen Vardar Aker,&nbsp;Zuhal Kus Silav,&nbsp;Bala Basak Oven","doi":"10.5146/tjpath.2022.01572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and the relationship between driver mutations and survival analysis in advanced-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A total of 122 advanced-stage NSCLC patients were included in this retrospective study. The patients were diagnosed based on cytological examination and histopathological analysis of biopsy or resection material that had undergone at least 1 molecular analysis. The expression of PD-L1 in tumors and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was scored and compared with age, sex, organ, biopsy method, tumor subtype, driver mutation status, and overall survival data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between PD-L1-positivity and age, gender, location, pattern, or pathological diagnosis of the type of sample. When the threshold value for PD-L1 IHC evaluation was accepted as ≥1% and ≥50%, the rate of positivity was 19.7% and 7.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since there is a wide range of positivity rates reported in the literature, we could not reach a conclusion as to whether the PD-L1-positivity rate we observed was high or low. There is a need for comparative studies where the technique, clones, threshold values, and phases are homogenized. There is an inverse correlation between the EGFR-mutant population and PD-L1 positivity. In terms of overall survival, no relationship was found between PD-L1 positivity, the presence of TIL, and EGFR mutation status.</p>","PeriodicalId":45415,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Pathology","volume":"38 3","pages":"261-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2022.01572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and the relationship between driver mutations and survival analysis in advanced-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

Material and method: A total of 122 advanced-stage NSCLC patients were included in this retrospective study. The patients were diagnosed based on cytological examination and histopathological analysis of biopsy or resection material that had undergone at least 1 molecular analysis. The expression of PD-L1 in tumors and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was scored and compared with age, sex, organ, biopsy method, tumor subtype, driver mutation status, and overall survival data.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between PD-L1-positivity and age, gender, location, pattern, or pathological diagnosis of the type of sample. When the threshold value for PD-L1 IHC evaluation was accepted as ≥1% and ≥50%, the rate of positivity was 19.7% and 7.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: Since there is a wide range of positivity rates reported in the literature, we could not reach a conclusion as to whether the PD-L1-positivity rate we observed was high or low. There is a need for comparative studies where the technique, clones, threshold values, and phases are homogenized. There is an inverse correlation between the EGFR-mutant population and PD-L1 positivity. In terms of overall survival, no relationship was found between PD-L1 positivity, the presence of TIL, and EGFR mutation status.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
程序性细胞死亡配体1在细胞学和外科非小细胞肺癌癌症标本中的表达与EGFR突变和总生存率的相关性:一种单一疾病经验。
目的:本研究旨在评估程序性细胞死亡配体-1(PD-L1)在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的表达及其驱动突变与生存分析的关系。根据至少经过1次分子分析的活检或切除材料的细胞学检查和组织病理学分析对患者进行诊断。对PD-L1在肿瘤和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)中的表达进行评分,并与年龄、性别、器官、活检方法、肿瘤亚型、驱动突变状态和总生存率数据进行比较。结果:PD-L1阳性率与样本类型的年龄、性别、位置、模式或病理诊断之间没有统计学上的显著差异。当PD-L1 IHC评估的阈值被接受为≥1%和≥50%时,阳性率分别为19.7%和7.4%。结论:由于文献中报道的阳性率范围很广,我们无法得出我们观察到的PD-L1阳性率是高还是低的结论。需要对技术、克隆、阈值和阶段进行同质化的比较研究。EGFR突变群体与PD-L1阳性之间存在负相关。就总生存率而言,未发现PD-L1阳性、TIL的存在和EGFR突变状态之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Difficult Diagnosis of Interdigitating Dendritic Cell Sarcoma of the Retroperitoneum: A Case Report and A Brief Review of the Literature. A Rare Case of Primary Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma with Signet-Ring Cells and Literature Review. Estimating Tumor Proportion in Smear Slides for Reliable Molecular Analysis. Evaluation of the Role of Taurine in Mitigating the Deleterious Effects of Tartrazine on the Kidneys in Rats: Experimental Study. Digital Quantification of Progesterone Receptor Expression in Meningiomas: Associations with WHO Grade and Clinicopathological Features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1