Evaluation of a Study Protocol of the Application of Humor Interventions in Palliative Care Through a First Pilot Study.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2023-09-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0014
Lisa Linge-Dahl, Sonja Heintz, Willibald Ruch, Maria Bley, Eckart von Hirschhausen, Lukas Radbruch
{"title":"Evaluation of a Study Protocol of the Application of Humor Interventions in Palliative Care Through a First Pilot Study.","authors":"Lisa Linge-Dahl,&nbsp;Sonja Heintz,&nbsp;Willibald Ruch,&nbsp;Maria Bley,&nbsp;Eckart von Hirschhausen,&nbsp;Lukas Radbruch","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Humor and laughter might have an alleviating effect on pain threshold and enhance coping and building relationships. However, randomized controlled studies in palliative care have struggled with high percentages of attrition and missing values.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate a study protocol through a pilot study for the evaluation of a multistage humor intervention with psychological and physiological outcome parameters that may be applied successfully in a palliative care environment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This pilot study utilized a pre-post design. The inclusion of a control group for the final study setting recruiting 120 patients is planned.</p><p><strong>Setting/subjects: </strong>The study was a monocenter study in a clinic for palliative care in Germany. All patients were eligible for recruitment. Seven patients were recruited for the pilot study.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Interventions were developed using a humor training for psychiatric patients. Quantitative sensory testing for pain threshold testing and questionnaires on humor as a character trait, pain intensity, life satisfaction, and symptom burden were planned to be evaluated before and after three humor interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The feasibility of the original study design was re-evaluated after pilot testing. Only two out of the seven patients were able to complete two interventions, requiring modification. Fewer questionnaires, less complex physiological testing, and reduction from three to two interventions were then planned.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The initial planned research methodology must be adjusted for patients with high symptom burden. In the experimental group of the final study setting, the effects of one to two interventions will be evaluated measuring oxytocin levels in saliva and using standardized questionnaires to determine cheerfulness, life satisfaction and symptom burden, as well as assessing as-needed medication.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS00028978 German Registry of Clinical Studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Humor and laughter might have an alleviating effect on pain threshold and enhance coping and building relationships. However, randomized controlled studies in palliative care have struggled with high percentages of attrition and missing values.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate a study protocol through a pilot study for the evaluation of a multistage humor intervention with psychological and physiological outcome parameters that may be applied successfully in a palliative care environment.

Design: This pilot study utilized a pre-post design. The inclusion of a control group for the final study setting recruiting 120 patients is planned.

Setting/subjects: The study was a monocenter study in a clinic for palliative care in Germany. All patients were eligible for recruitment. Seven patients were recruited for the pilot study.

Measurements: Interventions were developed using a humor training for psychiatric patients. Quantitative sensory testing for pain threshold testing and questionnaires on humor as a character trait, pain intensity, life satisfaction, and symptom burden were planned to be evaluated before and after three humor interventions.

Results: The feasibility of the original study design was re-evaluated after pilot testing. Only two out of the seven patients were able to complete two interventions, requiring modification. Fewer questionnaires, less complex physiological testing, and reduction from three to two interventions were then planned.

Conclusion: The initial planned research methodology must be adjusted for patients with high symptom burden. In the experimental group of the final study setting, the effects of one to two interventions will be evaluated measuring oxytocin levels in saliva and using standardized questionnaires to determine cheerfulness, life satisfaction and symptom burden, as well as assessing as-needed medication.

Trial registration: DRKS00028978 German Registry of Clinical Studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过第一项试点研究评估幽默干预在姑息治疗中的应用研究方案。
背景:幽默和笑声可能会缓解疼痛阈值,增强应对能力和建立关系。然而,姑息治疗的随机对照研究一直在与高百分比的损耗和缺失值作斗争。目的:我们旨在通过一项试点研究来评估一项研究方案,该研究旨在评估具有心理和生理结果参数的多阶段幽默干预,该干预可能在姑息治疗环境中成功应用。设计:本试验研究采用了前后设计。计划在最终研究环境中纳入一个对照组,招募120名患者。背景/受试者:这项研究是在德国一家姑息治疗诊所进行的单中心研究。所有患者均符合招募条件。试验研究招募了7名患者。测量:对精神病患者进行幽默训练,制定干预措施。计划在三次幽默干预前后评估疼痛阈值测试的定量感觉测试和幽默作为性格特征、疼痛强度、生活满意度和症状负担的问卷调查。结果:经过中试,重新评估了原始研究设计的可行性。七名患者中只有两名能够完成两项干预,需要修改。然后计划减少问卷调查,减少复杂的生理测试,并将干预措施从三项减少到两项。结论:对于症状负担较高的患者,必须调整最初计划的研究方法。在最终研究环境的实验组中,将通过测量唾液中的催产素水平,使用标准化问卷来评估一到两种干预措施的效果,以确定快乐程度、生活满意度和症状负担,并根据需要评估药物。试验注册:DRKS00028978德国临床研究注册中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, Outcomes and Factors for Place of Death in Patients Admitted to Community-Based Palliative Care Services in Shanghai China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Nursing Practices for Dyspnea Management in Patients with Cancer Based on Monthly and Weekly Prognoses: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study of Palliative Care Nurses in Japan. Is a Combination of Six Clinical Tests Useful as a Measure to Predict Short-Term Prognosis in Terminal Cancer Patients? A Prospective Observational Study in a Japanese Palliative Care Unit. The Surprise Question: Not Ready for Prime Time. Use of Nursing Support Among Nurses for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer in Palliative Care Units in Japan: Multisite Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1