Hemoglobin-to-Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio is Associated with All-Cause Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Neuro endocrinology letters Pub Date : 2023-07-05
Duo Yang, Jinxin Lan, Ruiyuan Xue, Kaihong Zhang, Shujun Ye, Zhiliang Huang, Longsheng Zhang
{"title":"Hemoglobin-to-Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio is Associated with All-Cause Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Duo Yang,&nbsp;Jinxin Lan,&nbsp;Ruiyuan Xue,&nbsp;Kaihong Zhang,&nbsp;Shujun Ye,&nbsp;Zhiliang Huang,&nbsp;Longsheng Zhang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR) has shown good prognostic value in various cancers. However, the relationship between HRR and outcomes in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between HRR and mortality among critically ill patients with TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database was utilized to conduct this retrospective cohort study. TBI patients were divided into four quartiles according to their HRR values. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, whereas the secondary outcomes were 60-day and 120-day mortality. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional risk models were performed to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relationship between HRR and mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were conducted to assess the prognostic value of HRR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 30-day mortality, after adjustment for all potential covariates, the relationship remained significant with HRR treated as a continuous variable (HR, 95% CI: 0.87 [0.81, 0.92]; p < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model, the HR with 95% CI for the second, third, and fourth quartile groups were 0.67 (0.5, 0.9), 0.65 (0.46, 0.94), and 0.5 (0.32, 0.79), respectively, compared to the first quartile group. A similar relationship was also observed for 60-day mortality and 120-day mortality. HRR had a better predictive value than hemoglobin and red cell distribution width (RDW).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A lower level of HRR is significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality among critically ill patients with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94154,"journal":{"name":"Neuro endocrinology letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro endocrinology letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR) has shown good prognostic value in various cancers. However, the relationship between HRR and outcomes in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between HRR and mortality among critically ill patients with TBI.

Methods: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database was utilized to conduct this retrospective cohort study. TBI patients were divided into four quartiles according to their HRR values. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, whereas the secondary outcomes were 60-day and 120-day mortality. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional risk models were performed to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relationship between HRR and mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were conducted to assess the prognostic value of HRR.

Results: For 30-day mortality, after adjustment for all potential covariates, the relationship remained significant with HRR treated as a continuous variable (HR, 95% CI: 0.87 [0.81, 0.92]; p < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model, the HR with 95% CI for the second, third, and fourth quartile groups were 0.67 (0.5, 0.9), 0.65 (0.46, 0.94), and 0.5 (0.32, 0.79), respectively, compared to the first quartile group. A similar relationship was also observed for 60-day mortality and 120-day mortality. HRR had a better predictive value than hemoglobin and red cell distribution width (RDW).

Conclusions: A lower level of HRR is significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality among critically ill patients with TBI.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比与重型颅脑损伤患者的全因死亡率相关。
背景:血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比(HRR)在各种癌症中显示出良好的预后价值。然而,HRR与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)危重患者预后之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨重型脑外伤患者的HRR与死亡率之间的关系。方法:利用重症监护IV医学信息集市(MIMIC-IV)数据库进行本回顾性队列研究。TBI患者根据其HRR值分为四个四分位数。主要结果为30天死亡率,而次要结果为60天和120天死亡率。采用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型来评估HRR与死亡率之间关系的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线用于评估HRR的预后价值。结果:对于30天死亡率,在校正了所有潜在协变量后,将HRR作为连续变量处理,这种关系仍然显著(HR,95%CI:0.87[0.81,0.92];p<0.001)。在完全校正的模型中,第二、第三和第四四分位数组的95%CI的HR分别为0.67(0.5,0.9)、0.65(0.46,0.94)和0.5(0.32,0.79),与第一个四分位数组相比。60天死亡率和120天死亡率也观察到类似的关系。HRR比血红蛋白和红细胞分布宽度(RDW)具有更好的预测价值。结论:在TBI危重患者中,较低的HRR水平与较高的全因死亡率显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building skills in cognitive behavioral supervision. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Solution Combining Convolutional Neural Network and Analytical Approach Showed Higher Accuracy in A-lines Detection on Lung Ultrasound in Thoracic Surgery Patients Compared with Radiology Resident. Impact of an over-the-counter "sleep lotion" on human salivary melatonin levels and sleep quality: a randomized controlled trial. New approach and strategy in the assessment of labour pain - Czech version of the labour coping pain assessment tool. Protective effects and mechanisms of deer blood phospholipids (DBP) on zearalenone-induced oxidative damage in swine Sertoli cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1