The Economic Burden of Residency Interviews on Applicants.

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Harold A Fogel, Tomas E Liskutin, Karen Wu, Lukas Nystrom, Brendan Martin, Adam Schiff
{"title":"The Economic Burden of Residency Interviews on Applicants.","authors":"Harold A Fogel,&nbsp;Tomas E Liskutin,&nbsp;Karen Wu,&nbsp;Lukas Nystrom,&nbsp;Brendan Martin,&nbsp;Adam Schiff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The residency match is increasingly competitive. The interview is an essential component, yet little has been documented about the costs applicants incur during the interview process and it is unclear how they manage these expenses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to define the economic burden of residency interviews for United States (U.S.) allopathic students participating in the 2016 Main Residency Match. We hypothesized that the financial burden of residency interviews varies based on specialty and plays a role in the applicant's ability to participate in all desired interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 26 question electronic survey was developed following pilot study of applicants to a single residency program. Following validation, the survey was distributed to administrative officials at all U.S. allopathic medical schools for circulation to senior students. Results were pooled for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received responses from 759 U.S. allopathic seniors. A single interview most commonly costs $250 - $499. Most applicants incurred substantial interview related costs. Sixtyfour percent of respondents spent at least $2,500, while 13% spent $7,500 or more. Specialty competitiveness was predictive of higher interview costs. Seventy-one percent of respondents borrowed money to fund interview costs, and 41% declined interviews for financial reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Senior medical students incur substantial costs to participate in residency interviews, often adding to already burdensome educational debt. We encourage residency programs, especially those in competitive specialty fields, to pursue cost reduction strategies. Additionally, medical schools should provide financial counseling to allow students to anticipate interview costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"38 ","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047386/pdf/IOJ-2018-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The residency match is increasingly competitive. The interview is an essential component, yet little has been documented about the costs applicants incur during the interview process and it is unclear how they manage these expenses.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to define the economic burden of residency interviews for United States (U.S.) allopathic students participating in the 2016 Main Residency Match. We hypothesized that the financial burden of residency interviews varies based on specialty and plays a role in the applicant's ability to participate in all desired interviews.

Methods: A 26 question electronic survey was developed following pilot study of applicants to a single residency program. Following validation, the survey was distributed to administrative officials at all U.S. allopathic medical schools for circulation to senior students. Results were pooled for statistical analysis.

Results: We received responses from 759 U.S. allopathic seniors. A single interview most commonly costs $250 - $499. Most applicants incurred substantial interview related costs. Sixtyfour percent of respondents spent at least $2,500, while 13% spent $7,500 or more. Specialty competitiveness was predictive of higher interview costs. Seventy-one percent of respondents borrowed money to fund interview costs, and 41% declined interviews for financial reasons.

Conclusions: Senior medical students incur substantial costs to participate in residency interviews, often adding to already burdensome educational debt. We encourage residency programs, especially those in competitive specialty fields, to pursue cost reduction strategies. Additionally, medical schools should provide financial counseling to allow students to anticipate interview costs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居住面试给申请人带来的经济负担。
背景:居留权的竞争越来越激烈。面试是一个重要的组成部分,但很少有关于申请人在面试过程中产生的费用的记录,也不清楚他们是如何管理这些费用的。目的:本研究的目的是确定参加2016年主要住院比赛的美国对抗疗法学生的住院面试的经济负担。我们假设,居住面试的经济负担因专业而异,并在申请人参与所有期望面试的能力中发挥作用。方法:在对单一居住项目的申请人进行试点研究后,开发了一项26个问题的电子调查。验证后,该调查被分发给美国所有对抗疗法医学院的行政官员,供高年级学生传阅。将结果汇总进行统计分析。结果:我们收到了759名美国对抗疗法老年人的回复。一次面试的费用通常在250-499美元之间。大多数申请者都承担了大量的面试相关费用。64%的受访者花费至少2500美元,13%的受访者花费7500美元或以上。专业竞争力预示着面试成本的上升。71%的受访者借钱支付面试费用,41%的受访者因经济原因拒绝面试。结论:高年级医学生参加住院面谈会产生巨大的费用,这往往会增加本已繁重的教育债务。我们鼓励住院医师项目,特别是那些在竞争激烈的专业领域的项目,采取降低成本的策略。此外,医学院应该提供财务咨询,让学生预测面试费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain Management for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. Peri-Operative Management of Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Report of Current Practices from the Anchor Group, Supporting Literature, and Areas for Future Investigation. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Very Young Children - A Case Report and Modern Review. Predicting Septic Arthritis in the Setting of Crystalline Arthropathy in the Native Joint Using Laboratory Data. Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Determination for the Need of Femoral Osteochondroplasty After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1