Implementation of robot-assisted myomectomy in a large university hospital: a retrospective descriptive study.

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.52054/FVVO.15.3.089
M Tahapary, S Timmerman, A Ledger, K Dewilde, W Froyman
{"title":"Implementation of robot-assisted myomectomy in a large university hospital: a retrospective descriptive study.","authors":"M Tahapary, S Timmerman, A Ledger, K Dewilde, W Froyman","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.15.3.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Background: Myomectomy is often the preferred treatment for symptomatic patients with myomas who wish to preserve their fertility, with a shift from open surgery towards minimally invasive techniques.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Retrospective study assessing patient and surgery characteristics, follow-up, and outcomes of robot-assisted myomectomy (RAM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in women treated between January 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022, in a Belgian tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A descriptive analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent myomectomies. 2018 was considered the learning curve for RAM.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>We assessed rate of open surgery, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and operative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 94 RAMs and 15 AMs were performed. The rate of AMs was 56.5% in 2018 versus 2.3% after the learning curve. The median operation time for RAM was 136.5 minutes and 131 minutes for AM. Conversion rate for RAM was 0%. The median postoperative hospital stay after RAM was 1 night and 4 nights for AM. Postoperative complication rate was low, with only 14.9% and 33.3% of patients requiring pharmacological treatment of complications after RAM or AM, respectively. No surgical re-intervention was needed in any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of RAM at our centre resulted in a significant reduction of open surgery rate. RAM demonstrated shorter hospital stays and a lower incidence of complications compared to AM.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Our study highlights the successful adoption of RAM, showcasing its potential to replace AM even in complex cases. The findings affirm the safety and feasibility of RAM, supporting its use as a valuable technique for minimally invasive myomectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"15 3","pages":"243-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.3.089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Background: Myomectomy is often the preferred treatment for symptomatic patients with myomas who wish to preserve their fertility, with a shift from open surgery towards minimally invasive techniques.

Objectives: Retrospective study assessing patient and surgery characteristics, follow-up, and outcomes of robot-assisted myomectomy (RAM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in women treated between January 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022, in a Belgian tertiary care hospital.

Materials and methods: A descriptive analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent myomectomies. 2018 was considered the learning curve for RAM.

Main outcome measures: We assessed rate of open surgery, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and operative complications.

Results: In total, 94 RAMs and 15 AMs were performed. The rate of AMs was 56.5% in 2018 versus 2.3% after the learning curve. The median operation time for RAM was 136.5 minutes and 131 minutes for AM. Conversion rate for RAM was 0%. The median postoperative hospital stay after RAM was 1 night and 4 nights for AM. Postoperative complication rate was low, with only 14.9% and 33.3% of patients requiring pharmacological treatment of complications after RAM or AM, respectively. No surgical re-intervention was needed in any group.

Conclusions: Implementation of RAM at our centre resulted in a significant reduction of open surgery rate. RAM demonstrated shorter hospital stays and a lower incidence of complications compared to AM.

What is new?: Our study highlights the successful adoption of RAM, showcasing its potential to replace AM even in complex cases. The findings affirm the safety and feasibility of RAM, supporting its use as a valuable technique for minimally invasive myomectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助子宫肌瘤剔除术在一所大型大学医院的实施:一项回顾性描述性研究。
背景:背景:子宫肌瘤切除术通常是有症状的肌瘤患者的首选治疗方法,这些患者希望保持生育能力,并从开放手术转向微创技术。目的:回顾性研究,评估2018年1月1日至2022年2月28日在比利时一家三级护理医院接受治疗的女性患者和手术特点、机器人辅助子宫肌瘤剔除术(RAM)和腹部子宫肌瘤切除术(AM)的随访和结果。材料和方法:对连续接受子宫肌瘤切除术的患者进行描述性分析。2018年被认为是RAM的学习曲线。主要观察指标:我们评估了开放手术率、手术时间、术后住院时间和手术并发症。结果:总共进行了94次RAM和15次AM。AM的发生率在2018年为56.5%,而在学习曲线之后为2.3%。RAM的中位操作时间为136.5分钟,AM为131分钟。RAM的转换率为0%。AM术后平均住院时间为1晚和4晚。术后并发症发生率较低,分别只有14.9%和33.3%的患者需要药物治疗RAM或AM后的并发症。任何一组都不需要再次手术干预。结论:在我们中心实施随机存取存储器显著降低了开放手术率。与AM相比,RAM的住院时间更短,并发症发生率更低。有什么新情况?:我们的研究强调了RAM的成功采用,展示了其即使在复杂情况下也能取代AM的潜力。研究结果证实了RAM的安全性和可行性,支持其作为微创子宫肌瘤切除术的一种有价值的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial. Achieving successful outcomes with endometrial ablation needs better case selection. Author's response. Caesarean scar defect and retained products of conception (RPOC): a step-by-step combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment. Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1