Adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the alarm fatigue assessment questionnaire

Öznur Erbay-Dallı RN, MSc, PhD , Kübra Bağcı-Derinpınar RN, MSc
{"title":"Adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the alarm fatigue assessment questionnaire","authors":"Öznur Erbay-Dallı RN, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Kübra Bağcı-Derinpınar RN, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.enfie.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Alarm fatigue may endanger the safety of patients by negatively affecting nurses' concentration and ability to provide effective care. Identifying alarm fatigue and taking appropriate measures are critical in preventing medical errors and for nurses to work with high motivation. This study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the 23-item Alarm Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire (AFAQ).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>The study was conducted between February 2022 and April 2022 and included nurses with at least one year of clinical or intensive care<span> experience. The data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. During the adaptation of AFAQ, language, content, and construct validity were evaluated; reliability was examined by </span></span>internal consistency analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The item and scale content validity index of AFAQ were found to be high (&gt;0.80). The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy indicated an adequate sampling (0.85); Bartlett's test of sphericity χ</span><sup>2</sup> was 1935.074, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <span>0.001. Exploratory factor analysis<span> (EFA) showed that the 21-item scale had a five-factor structure, explaining 51.606% of the total variance, and the factor loadings of the items were &gt;0.30 (0.422−0.803). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the five-factor model had a good fit index (χ</span></span><sup>2</sup>/df<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.855, SRMR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.039, RMSEA<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.048, CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.915, and TLI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.908) and appropriate factor loadings (&gt;0.30). The internal consistency of AFAQ (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) was 0.85, and the corrected item-total correlations were between 0.32−0.55.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results indicated that the Turkish version of the Alarm Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire was sufficiently valid and reliable to measure alarm fatigue in nurses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93991,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria intensiva","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 114-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984023000551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Alarm fatigue may endanger the safety of patients by negatively affecting nurses' concentration and ability to provide effective care. Identifying alarm fatigue and taking appropriate measures are critical in preventing medical errors and for nurses to work with high motivation. This study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the 23-item Alarm Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire (AFAQ).

Method

The study was conducted between February 2022 and April 2022 and included nurses with at least one year of clinical or intensive care experience. The data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. During the adaptation of AFAQ, language, content, and construct validity were evaluated; reliability was examined by internal consistency analysis.

Results

The item and scale content validity index of AFAQ were found to be high (>0.80). The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy indicated an adequate sampling (0.85); Bartlett's test of sphericity χ2 was 1935.074, p < 0.001. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the 21-item scale had a five-factor structure, explaining 51.606% of the total variance, and the factor loadings of the items were >0.30 (0.422−0.803). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the five-factor model had a good fit index (χ2/df = 1.855, SRMR = 0.039, RMSEA = 0.048, CFI = 0.915, and TLI = 0.908) and appropriate factor loadings (>0.30). The internal consistency of AFAQ (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) was 0.85, and the corrected item-total correlations were between 0.32−0.55.

Conclusion

The results indicated that the Turkish version of the Alarm Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire was sufficiently valid and reliable to measure alarm fatigue in nurses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对土耳其版本的警报疲劳评估问卷进行改编和验证。
目的:报警疲劳可能会对护士的注意力和提供有效护理的能力产生负面影响,从而危及患者的安全。识别警报疲劳并采取适当措施对于预防医疗失误和护士积极工作至关重要。本研究旨在测试土耳其版23项警报疲劳评估问卷(AFAQ)的心理测量特性。方法:该研究于2022年2月至2022年4月进行,包括至少有一年临床或重症监护经验的护士。数据是通过网络问卷收集的。在AFAQ的适应过程中,评估语言、内容和结构的有效性;可靠性通过内部一致性分析进行检验。结果:AFAQ的项目和量表内容有效性指数较高(>0.80)。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin抽样充分性测度表明抽样充分(0.85);球度的Bartlett检验χ2为1935.074,p0.30(0.422-0.803)。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,该五因子模型具有良好的拟合指数(χ2/df=1.855,SRMR=0.039,RMSEA=0.048,CFI=0.915,TLI=0.908)和适当的因子负荷(>0.30),校正项目总相关系数在0.32-0.55之间。结论:土耳其版的警报疲劳评估问卷在测量护士警报疲劳方面足够有效和可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electrophisiological monitoring of pain in non-communicative critically ill patients Nurses' role in spiritual care for patients and families in intensive care units: A scoping review Experience of an advanced practice nurse in an intensive care unit Quality of work life and intention to rotate in intensive care nurses. Cross-sectional study Parent experiences of child loss in a paediatric intensive care unit on human connection and compassionate care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1