Concordance of fine needle aspiration cytology and final histology of salivary gland tumours.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-09-01
F R Ndotora, B S Jackson
{"title":"Concordance of fine needle aspiration cytology and final histology of salivary gland tumours.","authors":"F R Ndotora,&nbsp;B S Jackson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely used diagnostic tool to evaluate salivary gland tumours. The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology allows for standardisation and facilitates cytologicalhistological correlation. However, FNAC findings can still pose a diagnostic challenge. The accuracy of FNAC should be assessed at each centre. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of FNAC and final histology of salivary gland tumours in three academic hospitals affiliated with the University of Pretoria, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a cross-sectional retrospective analytical study of 214 patients who underwent an operation for salivary gland tumours. All patients with FNAC and histology results between 2007-2017 were included. Patients were recruited from three University of Pretoria, South Africa, affiliated hospitals: Steve Biko Academic, Kalafong Provincial Tertiary and Tembisa Provincial Tertiary Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 214 patients with salivary gland tumours, the majority were located in the parotid gland (56.1%). Pleomorphic adenoma was the most common tumour (62.6%). The FNAC sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy (receiver operating characteristic) were 92.7%, 98.1% and 0.95 respectively. The concordance between salivary gland tumour FNAC and final histology was 96.95% with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.91 (<i>p</i>= 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is strong concordance between FNAC and histology of salivary gland tumours. FNAC is an accurate, minimally invasive diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity. It provides the clinician with a reliable preoperative diagnosis determining whether the salivary gland tumour is benign or malignant.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely used diagnostic tool to evaluate salivary gland tumours. The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology allows for standardisation and facilitates cytologicalhistological correlation. However, FNAC findings can still pose a diagnostic challenge. The accuracy of FNAC should be assessed at each centre. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of FNAC and final histology of salivary gland tumours in three academic hospitals affiliated with the University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Methods: The study was a cross-sectional retrospective analytical study of 214 patients who underwent an operation for salivary gland tumours. All patients with FNAC and histology results between 2007-2017 were included. Patients were recruited from three University of Pretoria, South Africa, affiliated hospitals: Steve Biko Academic, Kalafong Provincial Tertiary and Tembisa Provincial Tertiary Hospital.

Results: Of the 214 patients with salivary gland tumours, the majority were located in the parotid gland (56.1%). Pleomorphic adenoma was the most common tumour (62.6%). The FNAC sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy (receiver operating characteristic) were 92.7%, 98.1% and 0.95 respectively. The concordance between salivary gland tumour FNAC and final histology was 96.95% with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.91 (p= 0.0001).

Conclusion: There is strong concordance between FNAC and histology of salivary gland tumours. FNAC is an accurate, minimally invasive diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity. It provides the clinician with a reliable preoperative diagnosis determining whether the salivary gland tumour is benign or malignant.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唾液腺肿瘤细针抽吸细胞学检查与最终组织学检查的一致性。
背景:细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)是一种广泛用于评估唾液腺肿瘤的诊断工具。米兰唾液腺细胞病理学报告系统允许标准化,并促进细胞组织学相关性。然而,FNAC的发现仍然会对诊断提出挑战。应在每个中心评估FNAC的准确性。本研究的目的是评估南非比勒陀利亚大学附属的三家学术医院的FNAC与唾液腺肿瘤最终组织学的一致性。方法:本研究是对214名接受唾液腺肿瘤手术的患者进行的横断面回顾性分析研究。纳入2007-2017年间所有FNAC患者和组织学结果。患者来自南非比勒陀利亚大学的三家附属医院:Steve Biko Academic、Kalafong省立三级医院和Tembisa省立三三级医院。结果:在214名唾液腺肿瘤患者中,大多数位于腮腺(56.1%)。多形性腺瘤是最常见的肿瘤(62.6%),特异性和诊断准确率(受试者操作特征)分别为92.7%、98.1%和0.95。唾液腺肿瘤FNAC与最终组织学的一致性为96.95%,Cohen’s kappa系数为0.91(p=0.0001)。结论:FNAC与唾液腺肿瘤的组织学有很强的一致性。FNAC是一种准确、微创的诊断工具,具有高灵敏度和特异性。它为临床医生提供了可靠的术前诊断,以确定唾液腺肿瘤是良性还是恶性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
A case report on lingual schwannoma. Adult small bowel volvulus - a case series. Can we trust the data? - the data detective. Endoscopy-induced complication of barotrauma with concomitant benign pneumoperitoneum. Late presentation of Bochdalek hernia in children - experience at a single centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1