Does calibration pose improve scapular kinematic repeatability in functional tasks?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102829
Angelica E. Lang
{"title":"Does calibration pose improve scapular kinematic repeatability in functional tasks?","authors":"Angelica E. Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Tracking scapular motion can be challenging. More research is needed to determine the best practices for scapular measurement in multi-planar tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare the repeatability of scapular kinematics during a functional task protocol calculated from different calibration procedures. It was hypothesized that select poses would improve repeatability in specific tasks. The torso, humerus, and </span>scapula<span> were tracked with optical motion capture in two sessions for ten pain-free participants. Scapular calibrations were completed in five poses: neutral, maximum elevation, 90° abduction, hand to contralateral<span> shoulder, and hand to back. Each participant completed eight functional tasks (Comb Hair, Wash Axilla<span>, Tie Apron, Overhead Reach, Side Reach, Forward Transfer, Floor Lift, Overhead Lift). Scapular angles were calculated with five different calibration procedures and extracted at 30° increments of humeral elevation in each task. Mean difference, limits of agreement, intraclass correlations, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each task and elevation level. The inclusion of different calibration poses did not markedly improve outcomes over the maximum elevation double calibration for most tasks. Using this calibration procedure, median MDCs were 10.0° for upward rotation, 13.7° for internal rotation, and 9.8° for tilt.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 102829"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracking scapular motion can be challenging. More research is needed to determine the best practices for scapular measurement in multi-planar tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare the repeatability of scapular kinematics during a functional task protocol calculated from different calibration procedures. It was hypothesized that select poses would improve repeatability in specific tasks. The torso, humerus, and scapula were tracked with optical motion capture in two sessions for ten pain-free participants. Scapular calibrations were completed in five poses: neutral, maximum elevation, 90° abduction, hand to contralateral shoulder, and hand to back. Each participant completed eight functional tasks (Comb Hair, Wash Axilla, Tie Apron, Overhead Reach, Side Reach, Forward Transfer, Floor Lift, Overhead Lift). Scapular angles were calculated with five different calibration procedures and extracted at 30° increments of humeral elevation in each task. Mean difference, limits of agreement, intraclass correlations, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each task and elevation level. The inclusion of different calibration poses did not markedly improve outcomes over the maximum elevation double calibration for most tasks. Using this calibration procedure, median MDCs were 10.0° for upward rotation, 13.7° for internal rotation, and 9.8° for tilt.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校准姿势是否能提高功能性任务中肩胛骨运动的可重复性?
追踪肩胛骨的运动可能很有挑战性。需要更多的研究来确定在多平面任务中测量肩胛骨的最佳实践。本研究的目的是比较根据不同校准程序计算的功能任务方案中肩胛骨运动学的可重复性。据推测,选择姿势可以提高特定任务的可重复性。对10名无痛参与者进行了两次视觉运动捕捉,追踪躯干、肱骨和肩胛骨。肩胛骨校准采用五种姿势完成:中性、最大仰角、90°外展、手对侧肩和手对背。每位参与者完成了八项功能性任务(梳头发、洗Axilla、系围裙、头顶伸展、侧身伸展、前向转移、地板提升、头顶提升)。通过五种不同的校准程序计算肩胛角,并在每个任务中以30°的肱骨仰角增量提取。计算每个任务和海拔水平的平均差、一致性限度、组内相关性和最小可检测变化(MDC)。与大多数任务的最大仰角双重校准相比,包括不同的校准姿势并没有显著改善结果。使用该校准程序,向上旋转的中值MDCs为10.0°,内旋的中值MDCs为13.7°,倾斜的中值MDC为9.8°。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Inter-session Reliability of Magnetic Nerve Stimulation and Within-Session comparison to Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Evaluating Neuromuscular Function of Knee Extensor Muscles. Effect of tasks on intramuscular regional differences in rectus femoris elasticity during isometric contraction: An ultrasound shear wave elastography study. Flexor hallucis longus and tibialis anterior: A synergistic relationship. The unprecedented progresses in neuromechanics over the past 50 years - In celebration of the 50th anniversary of the international society of biomechanics. Wavelet-based time-frequency intermuscular beta-band coherence decreases with age but increases after mental fatigue in ankle muscles during gait independent of age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1