Does the quality of orthodontic studies influence their Altmetric Attention Score?

IF 2.6 3区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Korean Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.4041/kjod22.101

Thamer Alsaif, Nikolaos Pandis, Martyn T Cobourne, Jadbinder Seehra

{"title":"Does the quality of orthodontic studies influence their Altmetric Attention Score?","authors":"Thamer Alsaif, Nikolaos Pandis, Martyn T Cobourne, Jadbinder Seehra","doi":"10.4041/kjod22.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether an association between study quality, other study characteristics, and Altmetric Attention Scores (AASs) existed in orthodontic studies.Methods: The Scopus database was searched to identify orthodontic studies published between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Articles that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in this study. Study characteristics, including study quality were extracted and entered into a pre-pilot data collection sheet. Descriptive statistics were calculated. On an exploratory basis, random forest and gradient boosting machine learning algorithms were used to examine the influence of article characteristics on AAS.Results: In total, 586 studies with an AAS were analyzed. Overall, the mean AAS of the samples was 5. Twitter was the most popular social media platform for publicizing studies, accounting for 53.7%. In terms of study quality, only 19.1% of the studies were rated as having a high level of quality, with 41.8% of the studies deemed moderate quality. The type of social media platform, number of citations, impact factor, and study type were among the most influential characteristics of AAS in both models. In contrast, study quality was one of the least influential characteristics on the AAS.Conclusions: Social media platforms contributed the most to the AAS for orthodontic studies, whereas study quality had little impact on the AAS.","PeriodicalId":51260,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"53 5","pages":"328-335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/55/kjod-53-5-328.PMC10547592.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod22.101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether an association between study quality, other study characteristics, and Altmetric Attention Scores (AASs) existed in orthodontic studies.

Methods: The Scopus database was searched to identify orthodontic studies published between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Articles that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in this study. Study characteristics, including study quality were extracted and entered into a pre-pilot data collection sheet. Descriptive statistics were calculated. On an exploratory basis, random forest and gradient boosting machine learning algorithms were used to examine the influence of article characteristics on AAS.

Results: In total, 586 studies with an AAS were analyzed. Overall, the mean AAS of the samples was 5. Twitter was the most popular social media platform for publicizing studies, accounting for 53.7%. In terms of study quality, only 19.1% of the studies were rated as having a high level of quality, with 41.8% of the studies deemed moderate quality. The type of social media platform, number of citations, impact factor, and study type were among the most influential characteristics of AAS in both models. In contrast, study quality was one of the least influential characteristics on the AAS.

Conclusions: Social media platforms contributed the most to the AAS for orthodontic studies, whereas study quality had little impact on the AAS.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

正畸研究的质量会影响他们的高度注意力评分吗？

目的：本研究的目的是确定正畸研究中是否存在学习质量、其他学习特征和高度注意评分（AASs）之间的关联。方法：检索Scopus数据库，以确定2017年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间发表的正畸研究。符合资格标准的文章被纳入本研究。提取研究特征，包括研究质量，并将其输入试点前数据收集表中。计算描述性统计。在探索性的基础上，使用随机森林和梯度提升机器学习算法来检验文章特征对AAS的影响。结果：总共分析了586项使用AAS的研究。总体而言，样品的平均AAS为5。推特是最受欢迎的研究宣传社交媒体平台，占53.7%。在研究质量方面，只有19.1%的研究被评为高质量，41.8%的研究被认为质量中等。在这两个模型中，社交媒体平台的类型、引用次数、影响因素和研究类型是AAS最具影响力的特征。相反，研究质量是对AAS影响最小的特征之一。结论：社交媒体平台对正畸研究的AAS贡献最大，而研究质量对AAS的影响很小。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Korean Journal of Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

10.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Korean Journal of Orthodontics (KJO) is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal published in January, March, May, July, September, and November each year. It was first launched in 1970 and, as the official scientific publication of Korean Association of Orthodontists, KJO aims to publish high quality clinical and scientific original research papers in all areas related to orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Specifically, its interest focuses on evidence-based investigations of contemporary diagnostic procedures and treatment techniques, expanding to significant clinical reports of diverse treatment approaches. The scope of KJO covers all areas of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics including successful diagnostic procedures and treatment planning, growth and development of the face and its clinical implications, appliance designs, biomechanics, TMJ disorders and adult treatment. Specifically, its latest interest focuses on skeletal anchorage devices, orthodontic appliance and biomaterials, 3 dimensional imaging techniques utilized for dentofacial diagnosis and treatment planning, and orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal disharmony in association of orthodontic treatment.