Impact of Radiotherapy Volumes on Late-Term Cosmetic Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Unifocal and Multifocal/Multicentric Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Pelin Altınok, Ertuğrul Tekçe, Huriye Şenay Kızıltan, Zühal Gücin, Alpaslan Mayadağlı
{"title":"Impact of Radiotherapy Volumes on Late-Term Cosmetic Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Unifocal and Multifocal/Multicentric Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery.","authors":"Pelin Altınok,&nbsp;Ertuğrul Tekçe,&nbsp;Huriye Şenay Kızıltan,&nbsp;Zühal Gücin,&nbsp;Alpaslan Mayadağlı","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-5-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) is the standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer. The use of an additional RT dose (boost) to the tumour bed improves local control but may worsen quality of life (QOL) and cosmetic results. Multifocal/multicentric tumours (MMTs) pose a challenge as they require larger boost volumes. This study investigated the impact of RT volumes on late-term cosmetic outcomes and QOL in patients with unifocal and MMTs who underwent adjuvant RT after BCS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective data of 367 patients who underwent BCS between 2012 and 2014 were reviewed. A cohort of 121 patients with at least six months of completed RT were prospectively included in the study. Cosmetic results were evaluated using a modified scoring system, and QOL was assessed using The European Cancer Treatment and Organization Committee tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the inclusion of regional lymphatics in the RT treatment field significantly affected QOL, particularly in terms of role functioning and social functioning. Higher boost volume ratios were associated with increased pain-related symptoms. However, the presence of MMTs did not significantly affect cosmetic outcomes compared to unifocal tumours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The size of the boost and inclusion of regional lymphatics in RT significantly impact QOL in patients undergoing BCS. Tumour foci number does not affect cosmetic outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for careful consideration of RT volumes to minimize long-term adverse effects on QOL. Future prospective studies should evaluate early side effects and baseline QOL scores to provide a comprehensive assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":"19 4","pages":"287-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546804/pdf/ejbh-19-287.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-5-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) is the standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer. The use of an additional RT dose (boost) to the tumour bed improves local control but may worsen quality of life (QOL) and cosmetic results. Multifocal/multicentric tumours (MMTs) pose a challenge as they require larger boost volumes. This study investigated the impact of RT volumes on late-term cosmetic outcomes and QOL in patients with unifocal and MMTs who underwent adjuvant RT after BCS.

Materials and methods: Retrospective data of 367 patients who underwent BCS between 2012 and 2014 were reviewed. A cohort of 121 patients with at least six months of completed RT were prospectively included in the study. Cosmetic results were evaluated using a modified scoring system, and QOL was assessed using The European Cancer Treatment and Organization Committee tools.

Results: The results showed that the inclusion of regional lymphatics in the RT treatment field significantly affected QOL, particularly in terms of role functioning and social functioning. Higher boost volume ratios were associated with increased pain-related symptoms. However, the presence of MMTs did not significantly affect cosmetic outcomes compared to unifocal tumours.

Conclusion: The size of the boost and inclusion of regional lymphatics in RT significantly impact QOL in patients undergoing BCS. Tumour foci number does not affect cosmetic outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for careful consideration of RT volumes to minimize long-term adverse effects on QOL. Future prospective studies should evaluate early side effects and baseline QOL scores to provide a comprehensive assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放疗量对单灶性和多灶性/多灶性癌症患者乳腺癌术后近期美容效果和生活质量的影响。
目的:乳腺癌术后放疗(RT)是早期癌症的标准治疗方法。对肿瘤床使用额外的RT剂量(加强)可以改善局部控制,但可能会恶化生活质量(QOL)和美容效果。多焦点/多中心肿瘤(MMTs)是一个挑战,因为它们需要更大的增强体积。本研究调查了放疗量对BCS后接受辅助放疗的单灶性和MMTs患者的晚期美容结果和生活质量的影响。材料和方法:回顾性分析了2012年至2014年间367名接受BCS的患者的数据。该研究前瞻性地纳入了121名至少完成6个月RT的患者队列。使用改良的评分系统评估美容结果,并使用欧洲癌症治疗和组织委员会工具评估生活质量。结果:结果显示,在RT治疗领域纳入区域淋巴管显著影响生活质量,特别是在角色功能和社会功能方面。较高的升压容量比率与疼痛相关症状的增加有关。然而,与单灶性肿瘤相比,MMTs的存在并没有显著影响美容效果。结论:RT中区域淋巴管的增强和纳入的大小显著影响BCS患者的生活质量。肿瘤病灶数不影响美容效果。这些发现强调需要仔细考虑RT量,以最大限度地减少对生活质量的长期不利影响。未来的前瞻性研究应评估早期副作用和基线生活质量评分,以提供全面的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying the SOUND Trial for Omitting Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in Bahrain. Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Before and After Breast-Cancer Diagnosis Among Young Women in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Dietary Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk: A KCPS-II Cohort Study. Effect of Flaxseed on Pain Relief and Quality of Life in Patients With Mastalgia: A Single Arm Interventional Study. Mastalgia and Why It Should Be Evaluated With Imaging in Areas Where Use of Breast Cancer Screening Services are Unsatisfactory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1