Relationship of Serum Vitamin D Levels With Diabetic Foot in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Manar Fayiz Atoum, Amjad Al Shdaifat, Huda Al Hourani, Muwafag Al Hyari, Reema Zahran, Hanan Abu Shaikh
{"title":"Relationship of Serum Vitamin D Levels With Diabetic Foot in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Manar Fayiz Atoum,&nbsp;Amjad Al Shdaifat,&nbsp;Huda Al Hourani,&nbsp;Muwafag Al Hyari,&nbsp;Reema Zahran,&nbsp;Hanan Abu Shaikh","doi":"10.1177/15347346231205641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and aims:</b> Diabetic foot is one of the most severe complications in patients with diabetes mellitus and has been linked to 25-OH-vitamin D status. This study aims to determine the prevalence of 25-OH-vitamin D deficiency and its association with diabetic foot. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the diabetic foot group (n = 95) and the non-diabetic foot group (n = 388). Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured. The 25-OH-vitamin D and the other biochemical tests were extracted from the electronic medical records. The difference in clinical parameters between the diabetic foot group and the non-diabetic foot group was analyzed, and the risk factors of the diabetic foot group were analyzed using logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> The prevalence of 25-OH-vitamin D deficiency was 44.6%, accounting for 57.9% of all the diabetic foot group patients and only 41.0% of the non-diabetic foot group patients. The mean serum 25-OH-vitamin D level was significantly different between the diabetic foot group and the non-diabetic foot group (19.8 ± 9.5 vs 24.1 ± 11.8; <i>P</i> = .011). Serum 25-OH-vitamin D and B12 were found to have a significant positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.410, <i>P</i> = <.01). The 25-OH-vitamin D level and body mass index were independently associated with diabetic foot (<i>P</i> = .043, OR = 1.21; <i>P</i> = .009, OR =  1.47), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The 25-OH-vitamin D deficiency was higher in the diabetic foot group. More research is needed to understand the role of 25-OH-vitamin D in the development of diabetic foot.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231205641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Diabetic foot is one of the most severe complications in patients with diabetes mellitus and has been linked to 25-OH-vitamin D status. This study aims to determine the prevalence of 25-OH-vitamin D deficiency and its association with diabetic foot. Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the diabetic foot group (n = 95) and the non-diabetic foot group (n = 388). Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured. The 25-OH-vitamin D and the other biochemical tests were extracted from the electronic medical records. The difference in clinical parameters between the diabetic foot group and the non-diabetic foot group was analyzed, and the risk factors of the diabetic foot group were analyzed using logistic regression. Results: The prevalence of 25-OH-vitamin D deficiency was 44.6%, accounting for 57.9% of all the diabetic foot group patients and only 41.0% of the non-diabetic foot group patients. The mean serum 25-OH-vitamin D level was significantly different between the diabetic foot group and the non-diabetic foot group (19.8 ± 9.5 vs 24.1 ± 11.8; P = .011). Serum 25-OH-vitamin D and B12 were found to have a significant positive correlation (r = 0.410, P = <.01). The 25-OH-vitamin D level and body mass index were independently associated with diabetic foot (P = .043, OR = 1.21; P = .009, OR =  1.47), respectively. Conclusions: The 25-OH-vitamin D deficiency was higher in the diabetic foot group. More research is needed to understand the role of 25-OH-vitamin D in the development of diabetic foot.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病患者血清维生素D水平与糖尿病足的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景和目的:糖尿病足是糖尿病患者最严重的并发症之一,与25-OH维生素D状态有关。本研究旨在确定25-OH维生素D缺乏症的患病率及其与糖尿病足的关系。方法:2型糖尿病患者纳入本研究。将患者分为糖尿病足组(n = 95)和非糖尿病足组(n = 388)。测量体重、身高和腰围。25-OH维生素D和其他生化测试是从电子病历中提取的。分析糖尿病足组和非糖尿病足组临床参数的差异,并采用逻辑回归分析糖尿病足的危险因素。结果:25-OH维生素D缺乏的患病率为44.6%,占糖尿病足组患者的57.9%,仅占非糖尿病足组的41.0%。糖尿病足组和非糖尿病足组的平均血清25-OH维生素D水平有显著差异(19.8 ± 9.5比24.1 ± 11.8;P = .011)。血清25-OH维生素D与B12呈显著正相关(r = 0.410,P = P = .043,或 = 1.21;P = .009,或= 1.47)。结论:糖尿病足组25-OH维生素D缺乏率较高。需要更多的研究来了解25-OH维生素D在糖尿病足发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing. Analysis of Genetic Risk Factors Associated with Charcot Foot Based on the FinnGen Study R9 Data: A Wide-angle Mendelian Randomization Study. Manifestations of Endocrine Disease in the Lower Extremities: Beyond the Diabetic Foot. Evolving Strategies in the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers. Early Tissue Resection Versus Watchful Waiting After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1