Ayeong Jenny Kim, Edina Szabo, Claire E Lunde, Gabriela Comptdaer, David Zurakowski, Christine B Sieberg, Scott A Holmes
{"title":"Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety.","authors":"Ayeong Jenny Kim, Edina Szabo, Claire E Lunde, Gabriela Comptdaer, David Zurakowski, Christine B Sieberg, Scott A Holmes","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2023.1223239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is often used to understand the perceptual basis of acute and chronic conditions, including pain. As the need grows for developing a mechanistic understanding of neurological pathways underlying perception in the basic and clinical sciences, there is a greater need to adapt techniques such as QST to the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. No studies have yet evaluated the impact of the MR environment on the perception of thermal stimuli. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in temperature sensitivity outside an MR environment and during an MRI scanning session. We hypothesized that there would be a difference in how participants reported their pain sensitivity between the two environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy participants underwent thermal QST outside the MR scanning environment, where they were asked to rate the temperature of a noxious stimulus at which they perceived their pain to be 7/10, using a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10. Participants repeated this procedure inside a 3.0 T MRI approximately 30 min later. We repeated our investigation in a clinical cohort of participants with a chronic pain condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant changes of 1.1°C in thermal sensitivity between environments. This increase in pain threshold was found in healthy participants and replicated in the clinical cohort.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings can be applied toward improving MR safety, the resolution of brain pathways underlying pain mechanisms, and to more broadly comment on the impact of the MR environment on investigations that integrate perception-influenced processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"4 ","pages":"1223239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1223239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is often used to understand the perceptual basis of acute and chronic conditions, including pain. As the need grows for developing a mechanistic understanding of neurological pathways underlying perception in the basic and clinical sciences, there is a greater need to adapt techniques such as QST to the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. No studies have yet evaluated the impact of the MR environment on the perception of thermal stimuli. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in temperature sensitivity outside an MR environment and during an MRI scanning session. We hypothesized that there would be a difference in how participants reported their pain sensitivity between the two environments.
Methods: Healthy participants underwent thermal QST outside the MR scanning environment, where they were asked to rate the temperature of a noxious stimulus at which they perceived their pain to be 7/10, using a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10. Participants repeated this procedure inside a 3.0 T MRI approximately 30 min later. We repeated our investigation in a clinical cohort of participants with a chronic pain condition.
Results: There were statistically significant changes of 1.1°C in thermal sensitivity between environments. This increase in pain threshold was found in healthy participants and replicated in the clinical cohort.
Discussion: Findings can be applied toward improving MR safety, the resolution of brain pathways underlying pain mechanisms, and to more broadly comment on the impact of the MR environment on investigations that integrate perception-influenced processes.
引言:定量感觉测试(QST)通常用于了解包括疼痛在内的急性和慢性疾病的感知基础。随着对基础科学和临床科学中感知背后的神经通路的机械理解需求的增长,越来越需要将QST等技术适应磁共振(MR)环境。目前还没有研究评估磁共振环境对热刺激感知的影响。本研究旨在评估MR环境外和MRI扫描过程中温度敏感性的差异。我们假设,参与者在两种环境中报告疼痛敏感性的方式会有所不同。方法:健康参与者在MR扫描环境外接受热QST,要求他们使用0至10的Likert量表将他们感知疼痛的有害刺激的温度评为7/10。参与者在3.0 T MRI约30 分钟后。我们在一组患有慢性疼痛的参与者中重复了我们的研究。结果:在1.1°C的温度下,不同环境的热敏感性有统计学意义的变化。这种疼痛阈值的增加在健康参与者中发现,并在临床队列中复制。讨论:研究结果可用于提高MR安全性,解决疼痛机制背后的大脑通路,并更广泛地评论MR环境对整合感知影响过程的研究的影响。