The practice of simulation-based assessment in respiratory therapy education.

0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-02-01
Andrew J West, Gale Parchoma
{"title":"The practice of simulation-based assessment in respiratory therapy education.","authors":"Andrew J West,&nbsp;Gale Parchoma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical simulation has gained prominence as an educational approach in many Canadian respiratory therapy programs and is strongly associated with improved learning, clinical and nonclinical skill, future performance, and patient outcomes. Traditionally, the primary assessment approach employed in clinical simulation has been formative debriefing for learning. Contextual factors, such as limited opportunities for learning in clinical practice and technologically oriented perspectives on learning in clinical simulation, are converging to prompt a move from using formative debriefing sessions that support learning in simulation to employing high-stakes testing intended to measure entry-to-practice competencies. We adopt the perspective that these factors are intricately linked to the profession's regulatory environment, which may strongly influence how simulation practices become embedded with respiratory therapy educational programs. Through this discussion we challenge the profession to consider how environmental factors, including externally derived requirements, may ultimately impact the effectiveness of simulation-based learning environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":"53 1","pages":"13-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/ff/cjrt-53-001-cjrt.2017-13.PMC6422207.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical simulation has gained prominence as an educational approach in many Canadian respiratory therapy programs and is strongly associated with improved learning, clinical and nonclinical skill, future performance, and patient outcomes. Traditionally, the primary assessment approach employed in clinical simulation has been formative debriefing for learning. Contextual factors, such as limited opportunities for learning in clinical practice and technologically oriented perspectives on learning in clinical simulation, are converging to prompt a move from using formative debriefing sessions that support learning in simulation to employing high-stakes testing intended to measure entry-to-practice competencies. We adopt the perspective that these factors are intricately linked to the profession's regulatory environment, which may strongly influence how simulation practices become embedded with respiratory therapy educational programs. Through this discussion we challenge the profession to consider how environmental factors, including externally derived requirements, may ultimately impact the effectiveness of simulation-based learning environments.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟评估在呼吸治疗教育中的实践。
临床模拟作为一种教育方法在许多加拿大呼吸治疗项目中得到了重视,它与学习、临床和非临床技能、未来表现和患者结果的改善密切相关。传统上,临床模拟中采用的主要评估方法是形成性汇报学习。背景因素,如临床实践中学习的机会有限,以及临床模拟中学习的技术导向视角,正在趋同,促使人们从使用支持模拟学习的形成性汇报会议转向使用旨在衡量进入实践能力的高风险测试。我们认为,这些因素与专业的监管环境密切相关,这可能会强烈影响模拟实践如何融入呼吸治疗教育项目。通过这次讨论,我们向专业人士提出了挑战,让他们考虑环境因素,包括外部派生的需求,如何最终影响基于模拟的学习环境的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
期刊最新文献
Development of a guide for continuous positive airway pressure use - A good fit: Making continuous positive airway pressure work for you. Is CT pulmonary angiography overutilized in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism? A retrospective study. Highlighting the year's most transformative research as voted by the editorial board: Exploring knowledge gaps and research needs in respiratory therapy. Earning a Journal Impact Factor: Progress, recognition, and growth for the CJRT. CPAP vs HFNC in treatment of patients with COVID-19 ARDS: A retrospective propensity-matched study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1