{"title":"Microleakage along the implant-abutment interface: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.","authors":"Zhen Mao, Florian Beuer, Daomin Wu, Qiuyan Zhu, Jamila Yassine, Andreas Schwitalla, Franziska Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/s40729-023-00494-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the incidence of microleakage events (IME) and to identify the potential factors influencing the sealing ability of the implant-abutment interface (IAI) under in vitro investigation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, combined with a manual literature search was conducted up to September 2022. In vitro studies that reported the degree of microleakage at IAI under dynamic loading conditions were included. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean values of the incidence of microleakage events. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to further investigate the effect of different variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>675 studies were identified following the search process and 17 in vitro studies were selected according to the eligibility criteria. The weighted mean incidence of microleakage events was 47% (95% confidence interval: [0.33, 0.60]), indicating that contamination was observed in nearly half of the samples. Concerning possible factors that may influence microleakage (e.g., loading condition, assessment method, implant-abutment connection design, types of abutment material, the use of sealing agents), loading condition (p = 0.016) was the only variable that significantly influenced IME in the meta-regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrated that dynamic loading significantly increases the potential of bacterial penetration at the implant-abutment junction. The results should be interpreted carefully due to the data heterogeneity and further well-conducted in vitro studies with homogeneous samples are needed to standardize the methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"9 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00494-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the incidence of microleakage events (IME) and to identify the potential factors influencing the sealing ability of the implant-abutment interface (IAI) under in vitro investigation.
Material and methods: An electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, combined with a manual literature search was conducted up to September 2022. In vitro studies that reported the degree of microleakage at IAI under dynamic loading conditions were included. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean values of the incidence of microleakage events. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to further investigate the effect of different variables.
Results: 675 studies were identified following the search process and 17 in vitro studies were selected according to the eligibility criteria. The weighted mean incidence of microleakage events was 47% (95% confidence interval: [0.33, 0.60]), indicating that contamination was observed in nearly half of the samples. Concerning possible factors that may influence microleakage (e.g., loading condition, assessment method, implant-abutment connection design, types of abutment material, the use of sealing agents), loading condition (p = 0.016) was the only variable that significantly influenced IME in the meta-regression analysis.
Conclusions: The results demonstrated that dynamic loading significantly increases the potential of bacterial penetration at the implant-abutment junction. The results should be interpreted carefully due to the data heterogeneity and further well-conducted in vitro studies with homogeneous samples are needed to standardize the methodologies.
目的:本系统综述旨在评估微渗漏事件(IME)的发生率,并确定在体外研究中影响种植体-基牙界面(IAI)密封能力的潜在因素。材料和方法:截至2022年9月,对MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库进行了电子搜索,并结合了手动文献搜索。体外研究报告了动态负载条件下IAI的微渗漏程度。进行荟萃分析以计算微渗漏事件发生率的平均值。进行亚组分析和元回归,以进一步研究不同变量的影响。结果:在搜索过程中确定了675项研究,根据资格标准选择了17项体外研究。微渗漏事件的加权平均发生率为47%(95%置信区间:[0.33,0.60]),表明在近一半的样本中观察到污染。关于可能影响微渗漏的因素(例如,加载条件、评估方法、种植体-基牙连接设计、基牙材料类型、密封剂的使用)、加载条件(p = 0.016)是在元回归分析中唯一显著影响IME的变量。结论:结果表明,动态载荷显著增加了细菌在种植体-基牙交界处的渗透潜力。由于数据的异质性,应仔细解释结果,需要对同质样本进行进一步的体外研究,以使方法标准化。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.