Waiting time for kidney transplantation based on calculated panel reactive antibodies: experience of a southern Brazilian center.

Lisianara Acosta Ramos, Tiago Schiavo, Juliana Montagner, Cristiane Bundcher, Roger Kist, Valter Duro Garcia, Jorge Neumann, Elizete Keitel
{"title":"Waiting time for kidney transplantation based on calculated panel reactive antibodies: experience of a southern Brazilian center.","authors":"Lisianara Acosta Ramos, Tiago Schiavo, Juliana Montagner, Cristiane Bundcher, Roger Kist, Valter Duro Garcia, Jorge Neumann, Elizete Keitel","doi":"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0132en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyze the waiting list for kidney transplantation in our hospital according to candidate's panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One thousand six hundred forty patients who were on the waiting list between 2015 and 2019 were included. For the analysis, hazard ratios (HR) for transplant were estimated by Fine and Gray's regression model according to panel reactivity and HR for graft loss and death after transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 45.39 ± 18.22 years. Male gender was predominant (61.2%), but the proportion decreased linearly with the increase in cPRA (p < 0.001). The distribution of patients according to panels were: 0% (n = 390), 1% - 49% (n = 517), 50% - 84% (n = 269), and ≥ 85% (n = 226). Transplantation was achieved in 85.5% of the sample within a median time of 8 months (CI 95%: 6.9 - 9.1). The estimated HRs for transplantation during the follow-up were 2.84 (95% CI: 2.51 - 3.34), 2.41(95%CI: 2.07 - 2.80), and 2.45(95%CI: 2.08 - 2.90) in the cPRA range of 0%, 1%-49%, and 50%-84%, respectively, compared to cPRA ≥ 85 (p < 0.001). After transplantation, the HR for graft loss was similar in the different cPRA groups, but the HR for death (0.46 95% CI 0.24-0.89 p = 0.022) was lower in the 0% cPRA group when adjusted for age, gender, and presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with cPRA below 85% are more than twice as likely to receive a kidney transplantation with a shorter waiting time. The risk of graft loss after transplantation was similar in the different cPRA groups, and the adjusted risk of death was lower in nonsensitized recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14724,"journal":{"name":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","volume":" ","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10962418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0132en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the waiting list for kidney transplantation in our hospital according to candidate's panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and its outcomes.

Methods: One thousand six hundred forty patients who were on the waiting list between 2015 and 2019 were included. For the analysis, hazard ratios (HR) for transplant were estimated by Fine and Gray's regression model according to panel reactivity and HR for graft loss and death after transplantation.

Results: The mean age was 45.39 ± 18.22 years. Male gender was predominant (61.2%), but the proportion decreased linearly with the increase in cPRA (p < 0.001). The distribution of patients according to panels were: 0% (n = 390), 1% - 49% (n = 517), 50% - 84% (n = 269), and ≥ 85% (n = 226). Transplantation was achieved in 85.5% of the sample within a median time of 8 months (CI 95%: 6.9 - 9.1). The estimated HRs for transplantation during the follow-up were 2.84 (95% CI: 2.51 - 3.34), 2.41(95%CI: 2.07 - 2.80), and 2.45(95%CI: 2.08 - 2.90) in the cPRA range of 0%, 1%-49%, and 50%-84%, respectively, compared to cPRA ≥ 85 (p < 0.001). After transplantation, the HR for graft loss was similar in the different cPRA groups, but the HR for death (0.46 95% CI 0.24-0.89 p = 0.022) was lower in the 0% cPRA group when adjusted for age, gender, and presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA).

Conclusion: Patients with cPRA below 85% are more than twice as likely to receive a kidney transplantation with a shorter waiting time. The risk of graft loss after transplantation was similar in the different cPRA groups, and the adjusted risk of death was lower in nonsensitized recipients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于计算的群体反应性抗体的肾移植等待时间:巴西南部一个中心的经验。
引言:本研究的目的是根据候选群体反应性抗体(cPRA)及其结果分析我院肾移植的等待名单。方法:纳入2015年至2019年间在等待名单上的一千六百四十名患者。在分析中,根据面板反应性和移植后移植物丢失和死亡的HR,通过Fine和Gray回归模型估计移植的风险比(HR)。结果:平均年龄45.39±18.22岁。男性占主导地位(61.2%),但这一比例随着cPRA的增加而线性下降(p<0.001)。根据面板的患者分布为:0%(n=390)、1%-49%(n=517)、50%-84%(n=269)和≥85%(n=226)。85.5%的样本在中位时间8个月内完成了移植(CI 95%:6.9-9.1)。随访期间移植的估计HR分别为2.84(95%CI:2.51-3.34)、2.41(95%CI:2.07-2.80)和2.45(95%CI:2.08-2.90),cPRA范围分别为0%、1%-49%和50%-84%,而cPRA≥85(p<0.001)。移植后,不同cPRA组移植物丢失的HR相似,但经年龄、性别和供体特异性抗体(DSA)调整后,0%cPRA组的死亡HR(0.46 95%CI 0.24-0.89 p=0.022)较低。结论:cPRA低于85%的患者接受肾移植的可能性是cPRA患者的两倍多,等待时间更短。不同cPRA组移植后移植物丢失的风险相似,非敏感受体的调整后死亡风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
208
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological profile of kidney transplant patients with lupus nephritis. Perceptions related to the layout of Visual Abstracts among physicians and medical students. A rare form of urinary tract infection in a transplanted patient. Extensive urogenital calcification and hypercalcemia secondary to disseminated tuberculosis. Delving into the complexities of the interplay between acute kidney injury and diabetic kidney disease: A focus on glycemic control and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1