Beginning with the End in Mind: A Product Evaluation of Integrated Clinical Education Courses.

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Yvonne M Colgrove, Jason L Rucker
{"title":"Beginning with the End in Mind: A Product Evaluation of Integrated Clinical Education Courses.","authors":"Yvonne M Colgrove,&nbsp;Jason L Rucker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the product evaluation of a curriculum of integrated clinical education (ICE) implemented into a Doctor of Physical Therapy program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A novel curriculum incorporating five stand-alone ICE courses was developed and evaluated using the Context, Input, Product, Process program assessment model. Primary outcomes for product evaluation included Clinical Performance Instrument (web-CPI) ratings of student performance, student self-assessment aptitude, student satisfaction, and clinical remediation counts during full-time clinical education experiences (FTCEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outcomes from the first ICE curriculum cohort (n=58) were compared to the prior two traditional curriculum cohorts (n=76). There were no differences in clinical instructors' (CI) final web-CPI assessments during terminal FTCEs. However, ICE students scored higher on initial and intermediate FTCEs and were more satisfied with the clinical education program. Student and CI final web-CPI ratings indicated ICE group's ratings aligned more closely with CI ratings. Remediation was similar between the two curricula, and the majority of CIs felt ICE students were at least as well prepared for FTCEs as students in the traditional curriculum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes of our product evaluation suggest that educational strategies such as ICE may be capable of maximizing student potential and reducing clinic and program resources during clinical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"52 3","pages":"219-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the product evaluation of a curriculum of integrated clinical education (ICE) implemented into a Doctor of Physical Therapy program.

Methods: A novel curriculum incorporating five stand-alone ICE courses was developed and evaluated using the Context, Input, Product, Process program assessment model. Primary outcomes for product evaluation included Clinical Performance Instrument (web-CPI) ratings of student performance, student self-assessment aptitude, student satisfaction, and clinical remediation counts during full-time clinical education experiences (FTCEs).

Results: Outcomes from the first ICE curriculum cohort (n=58) were compared to the prior two traditional curriculum cohorts (n=76). There were no differences in clinical instructors' (CI) final web-CPI assessments during terminal FTCEs. However, ICE students scored higher on initial and intermediate FTCEs and were more satisfied with the clinical education program. Student and CI final web-CPI ratings indicated ICE group's ratings aligned more closely with CI ratings. Remediation was similar between the two curricula, and the majority of CIs felt ICE students were at least as well prepared for FTCEs as students in the traditional curriculum.

Conclusion: The outcomes of our product evaluation suggest that educational strategies such as ICE may be capable of maximizing student potential and reducing clinic and program resources during clinical education.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从心到尾:综合临床教育课程的产品评价。
目的:描述综合临床教育(ICE)课程在物理治疗博士项目中的产品评估。方法:采用情境、输入、产品、过程项目评估模型,开发并评估了一个包含五门独立ICE课程的新课程。产品评估的主要结果包括临床表现工具(web CPI)对学生表现、学生自我评估能力、学生满意度和全日制临床教育经历期间的临床补救计数的评分。结果:将第一个ICE课程队列(n=58)的结果与前两个传统课程队列(n=76)进行比较。在终端FTCE期间,临床讲师(CI)的最终网络CPI评估没有差异。然而,ICE学生在初级和中级FTCE中的得分更高,对临床教育项目更满意。学生和CI的最终网络CPI评级表明,ICE集团的评级与CI评级更为一致。两种课程之间的补救措施相似,大多数CI认为ICE学生至少与传统课程中的学生一样为FTCE做好了充分准备。结论:我们的产品评估结果表明,在临床教育过程中,ICE等教育策略可能能够最大限度地发挥学生潜力,减少临床和项目资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Education Intervention: A Pilot Study to Assess the Effectiveness of a Brief, Self-Paced Intervention to Prevent Burnout in Physician Assistant Students. Allied Health Collaborative Practice Capability: A Coalescence of Capabilities. Demonstrating the Hallmarks of Gynecologic Malignancies by Translating Radiation Therapy Theory to Clinical Practice: A Student and Mentor Perspective. Factors Contributing to Physical Therapist Attrition: A Qualitative Study. How Do Physicians and Nurse Practitioners Perceive the Title Change from Physician Assistant to Physician Associate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1