Teaching Students to Care (Coordinate): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q3 Medicine Wisconsin Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-01
Lara Voigt, James McCarthy, Ankur Segon
{"title":"Teaching Students to Care (Coordinate): A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Lara Voigt,&nbsp;James McCarthy,&nbsp;Ankur Segon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interdisciplinary rounds are a vital part of discharge planning; however, medical students receive little training in how to contribute effectively. Many existing discharge planning curricula are either prohibitively time consuming or narrowly focused. Addressing this gap can help improve interdisciplinary care and enhance the role of medical students on inpatient teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a 30-minute curriculum on the purpose of interdisciplinary rounds, expected presentation content, and team members' roles and conducted a randomized controlled trial among medical students on their inpatient internal medicine rotation. Outcomes were measured using pre- and post-curriculum surveys and comparison of evaluations of student participation in interdisciplinary rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six medical students participated in the study (59 intervention, 27 control), and we received 142 presentation evaluations (91 intervention, 51 control). There was significant post-curriculum improvement in all students' understanding of and comfort presenting in interdisciplinary rounds and knowledge of team members' roles. Presentation evaluations did not show a significant difference; however, students in the intervention group were better able to answer questions about their patients, with a difference approaching statistical significance (70% vs 57%, <i>P</i> = 0.069).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A brief, just-in-time curriculum improved learners' knowledge of interdisciplinary discharge rounds and showed a trend towards improvement in their ability to answer questions during rounds. Our curriculum can empower medical students to help their inpatient teams by participating in discharge rounds and can be integrated into existing curricula with minimal disruption.</p>","PeriodicalId":38747,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interdisciplinary rounds are a vital part of discharge planning; however, medical students receive little training in how to contribute effectively. Many existing discharge planning curricula are either prohibitively time consuming or narrowly focused. Addressing this gap can help improve interdisciplinary care and enhance the role of medical students on inpatient teams.

Methods: We developed a 30-minute curriculum on the purpose of interdisciplinary rounds, expected presentation content, and team members' roles and conducted a randomized controlled trial among medical students on their inpatient internal medicine rotation. Outcomes were measured using pre- and post-curriculum surveys and comparison of evaluations of student participation in interdisciplinary rounds.

Results: Eighty-six medical students participated in the study (59 intervention, 27 control), and we received 142 presentation evaluations (91 intervention, 51 control). There was significant post-curriculum improvement in all students' understanding of and comfort presenting in interdisciplinary rounds and knowledge of team members' roles. Presentation evaluations did not show a significant difference; however, students in the intervention group were better able to answer questions about their patients, with a difference approaching statistical significance (70% vs 57%, P = 0.069).

Conclusions: A brief, just-in-time curriculum improved learners' knowledge of interdisciplinary discharge rounds and showed a trend towards improvement in their ability to answer questions during rounds. Our curriculum can empower medical students to help their inpatient teams by participating in discharge rounds and can be integrated into existing curricula with minimal disruption.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学生关心(协调):一项随机对照试验。
导言:跨学科查房是出院规划的重要组成部分;然而,医学生很少接受如何有效贡献的培训。许多现有的出院规划课程要么耗费大量时间,要么重点狭窄。解决这一差距有助于改善跨学科护理,并加强医学生在住院团队中的作用。方法:我们制定了一份30分钟的课程表,内容包括跨学科查房、预期演讲内容和团队成员的角色,并在医学生中进行了一项关于住院内科轮换的随机对照试验。结果是通过课程前和课程后的调查以及对学生参与跨学科轮次的评估进行比较来衡量的。结果:86名医学生参与了这项研究(59名干预者,27名对照者),我们收到了142份陈述评估(91份干预者,51份对照者)。在课程结束后,所有学生对跨学科轮次的理解和舒适感以及对团队成员角色的了解都有了显著提高。陈述评价没有显示出显著差异;然而,干预组的学生能够更好地回答有关患者的问题,差异接近统计学意义(70%对57%,P = 0.069)。结论:简短、及时的课程提高了学习者对跨学科出院查房的知识,并显示出在查房期间回答问题的能力有所提高的趋势。我们的课程可以让医学生通过参加出院查房来帮助他们的住院团队,并可以在最小干扰的情况下融入现有课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wisconsin Medical Journal
Wisconsin Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Wisconsin Medical Society is the largest association of medical doctors in the state with more than 12,000 members dedicated to the best interests of their patients. With that in mind, wisconsinmedicalsociety.org offers patients a unique source for reliable, physician-reviewed medical information. The Wisconsin Medical Society has been a trusted source for health policy leadership since 1841.
期刊最新文献
Age-Appropriate Cancer Screenings Through a Dermatology Len. Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Biology: Tools for Building New Treatments. Amiodarone Pharmacovigilance Through an Intelligent Electronic Health Record Application. Assessment of Uterine Fibroid Knowledge and Educational Interests Among Health Care Professionals. An Unusual Presentation of Blastomycosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1